codyGT said:Back to my original post all of the items that make a Mach a 1/4 mile car are also present on the GT except the 3.55 gears.
MAC[H]Z said:We have atleast 10 mach's that run at my local track and most of them run 13.6-13.8 bone stock but one guy did run 13.2 bone stock but he can drive the hell out of it. We also have 03AV8R that has all the bolt ons with no motor work done and he has run 11.97 so even with all the same bolt ons on a GT there is no way you are going to run those numbers.
codyGT said:This is kinda funny now what about this formula
2003-2004 Cobra > 94-98 GT, 99+ GT, Mach1
I guess I think Mach1's are ugly retro crap so maybe if I thought differently I wouldn't like getting beat by a GT either.
codyGT said:I don't care what a Mach1 site says, I have seen alot of dyno graphs for Mach1's and most don't even lay down 290rwhp. They don't have 330fwhp.
Back to my original post all of the items that make a Mach a 1/4 mile car are also present on the GT except the 3.55 gears.
codyGT said:Beating 2 out of three Mach1's I have raced make me/my car inferior?
Not to mention I love the way my Mustang drives with my set-up. Like I stated in one of my earlier posts 90% of the Mach owners I talk to act as if there car is the fastest thing around and they aren't.
I enjoy my Mustang just as much as my SS or my G/F's SRT-4. It is alot more fun to step up to a Mach1 in a GT. I like surprises.
Maybe where u live, but here ive seen stock 02ss/auto run a 13.3@104 mph 3 times in a row. Ive also seen a variety of lightly modded ss's (exhaust, gears,lid,throttle body) run 12.4-12.7 with drag radials though. I respect the mustang GT, mach-1 and LS-1's as well and dont care who runs what, but its nice to see AMERICAN cars running good numbers in te 1/4 cause the imports are taking over (slowly but surely)................A 14.0/1/4 mile car is almost laughable in japan standards so america better tighten up in the hsrpwr wars right now!Gearbanger 101 said:Stock LT-1's don't run low 13's Mid to high with good traction maybe, but low 13's is pushing it.
Im stating what I saw and my facts are facts. If I mistakenly addressed a lt-1 then sorry, but ls-1's/mach-1's do run similar 1/4 mile times reardless of hrspwr and GT's can run with both with the proper add on's (full exhaust, gears, timing, drag radials, good tune)!Gearbanger 101 said:That's all fine and dandy, but you're getting your facts mixed up. An '02 Camaro and all 98'-up F-bodies are LS-1's, not LT-1's. Big difference! LT-1's were used in the earlier F-bodies (93-97), which like I said, don't run low-13's in stock trim.
That's all fine and dandy, but you're getting your facts mixed up. An '02 Camaro and all 98'-up F-bodies are LS-1's, not LT-1's. Big difference! LT-1's were used in the earlier F-bodies (93-97), which like I said, don't run low-13's in stock trim.big T said:Maybe where u live, but here ive seen stock 02ss/auto run a 13.3@104 mph 3 times in a row. Ive also seen a variety of lightly modded ss's (exhaust, gears,lid,throttle body) run 12.4-12.7 with drag radials though. I respect the mustang GT, mach-1 and LS-1's as well and dont care who runs what, but its nice to see AMERICAN cars running good numbers in te 1/4 cause the imports are taking over (slowly but surely)................A 14.0/1/4 mile car is almost laughable in japan standards so america better tighten up in the hsrpwr wars right now!
Youre the one that got things mixed up.Gearbanger 101 said:That's all fine and dandy, but you're getting your facts mixed up. An '02 Camaro and all 98'-up F-bodies are LS-1's, not LT-1's. Big difference! LT-1's were used in the earlier F-bodies (93-97), which like I said, don't run low-13's in stock trim.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?