• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech

2.3l durability

  • Thread starter Thread starter gregbob
  • Start date Start date Jul 22, 2009
G

gregbob

New Member
Jul 22, 2009
3
0
0
Jul 22, 2009
#1
  • Jul 22, 2009
  • #1
I am looking to buy a 90 LX 2.3l with 148k on it. It appears to be very well maintained but could I get some opinions on life span. What kind of mileage can be had on original engines if they are taken care of?
Thanks
 

stykthyn

I want to measure mine. It doesn't look that tall.
15 Year Member
Jul 6, 2006
5,232
2,652
223
gainesville
Jul 28, 2009
#2
  • Jul 28, 2009
  • #2
mine had over 200k on it and it ran great when I sold it.
 
4

4turboho

New Member
Jan 31, 2009
119
0
0
Jul 29, 2009
#3
  • Jul 29, 2009
  • #3
they will run forever if maintained. I had a 89 with a 179k and before I pulled it out I sat out in front of my house and did arount 15 nuetral drops from redline gave the motor to someone and he said it was the best running engine he has ever drivin.....I ran the motor for 2 years to the ground when I was 16 I honestly dont remember changing the oil very much but the sucker sill ran great!!
 

reddy351

10 Year Member
Jun 13, 2006
559
12
38
Columbus, Ohio
Jul 29, 2009
#4
  • Jul 29, 2009
  • #4
And they have been known to make gratuitous horsepower with a turbo. And it doesnt affect durability. Turbo Coupes, SVO Mustangs and Merkur XR4ti's regularly see 200k miles with tons of boost thrown at them.
 

90mustangGT

I felt sorry for girls because
Founding Member
Jan 15, 2002
2,773
17
89
Dallas, GA
Jul 30, 2009
#5
  • Jul 30, 2009
  • #5
They are reliable simple engines that last a long time. If they do break they are cheap and easy to fix. The timing belts are easier to change than the serp. belt on most FWD cars.
 

89 ST4NG

15 Year Member
Jul 29, 2008
36
0
7
Virginia
Aug 3, 2009
#6
  • Aug 3, 2009
  • #6
My 89 is about to hit 200k

I usually get a combined 25mpg
 

Dr_EluSivE

Founding Member
Apr 24, 2002
2,155
0
56
Central Illinois
Aug 3, 2009
#7
  • Aug 3, 2009
  • #7
Engines are good, Auto Trannys suck though, get a manual if mileage is high.

Dr.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Mustang II 4 cyl gear hunting and possibly messed up vacuum system
  • oesterreicher
  • May 31, 2026
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
11
Views
154
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Sunday at 5:39 PM
manicmechanic007
M
Engine Unexplainable Exhaust Pop and Gurgle
  • Mrnissen122
  • Feb 14, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
12
Views
474
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 18, 2026
Noobz347
L
95 gt engine vibration
  • lenzgt
  • May 11, 2026
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
6
Views
135
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech May 26, 2026
lenzgt
L
The Dilemma! 1988 LX 5.0
  • TTSaleen
  • Sep 11, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
300
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 11, 2025
Noobz347
N
Fox Street Suspension Build Advice
  • NYFox
  • Jan 25, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
292
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 28, 2026
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?