• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech

2.3L upgrade....

  • Thread starter Thread starter Shinlee
  • Start date Start date Feb 13, 2006
S

Shinlee

New Member
Feb 10, 2006
146
0
0
Feb 13, 2006
#1
  • Feb 13, 2006
  • #1
well...tell me if this sounds sound, or like a really really dumb idea please.

i have a 92 2.3 n/a, and i want to beef it up a little bit.

putting a 2.5 stroker kit on it, and a stage 1 turbo cam kit, so basically all the internals are going to be completly rebuilt. the engine should then be worth yeilding ( with u/d pulleys, ram air, ranger header ) 160-170 ish HP, and strippin it down with speed glass on it, so i should be able to pull low 14's in the quarter.

after this, when the funds become available, i am going to install a t3/t4 hybrid, with turbo header, 3'' down pipe, and 3'' exhaust, intercooled as well so i should be in the low 11's to high 10's.


any thoughts on this idea?

would appreciate some feedback pls
 
R

RustBucket

New Member
Jun 8, 2003
585
0
0
Buford, GA
Feb 13, 2006
#2
  • Feb 13, 2006
  • #2
It sounds like you're trying to build a turbo motor without hanging a turbo on it right away. I think you're going to end up spending more money building the motor one way then changing key parts to go the other. The main thing that comes to mind is pistons. You're not going to make any real power if you put the forged, dished turbo friendly pistons in your N.A. stroker. The only 14's you'll be seeing will be your 0-60's You're going to spend money building that motor twice that could be used elsewhere.

I'm not a fan of building dual plug motors for power. It can be done and has been done, just not by me. There's just too many things that need to be done to get them to live happily under boost. The head on your '92 is horrible. The later dual plug heads are much better from a flow standpoint but I still think high boost will require some serious EEC tuning.

Without seeing the cam specs, its hard to say for sure what a "Stage 1 Turbo cam" really is. If a cam is best suited for a turbo charged application, putting it in a N.A. motor is like putting snow tires on a Florida car. Yeah it'll work, but not as good something else better suited for the intended purpose.

If you're final goal is to have a turbocharged motor, then you should build it that way from the start especially if you're on a budget. Nothing kills a budget faster than backtracking.

Something to think about too is that non-intercooled stock turbo motors were rated at 175hp off the showroom floor. Now there's a foundation to start from.

Bottom line, if you want to build a dual plug stroker motor with all the goodies you can hang on it, then all of your parts decisions should be based on that goal. If you want to throw a turbocharger on it and crank up the boost then your decisions should be based on that. You can't build both within the same motor.

That's my thoughts anyway.
 

samickguy15

Member
Sep 1, 2005
404
0
16
Delavan, IL
Feb 14, 2006
#3
  • Feb 14, 2006
  • #3
I agree with Rustbucket. I would stay in stock trim until you can get the turbo. I would suggest the header and intake stuff, but no rebuild until turbo time.
 
S

Shinlee

New Member
Feb 10, 2006
146
0
0
Feb 17, 2006
#4
  • Feb 17, 2006
  • #4
well, thanks for the answers first off.

i wouldnt rebuild the motor twice, would rebuild it as if i were setting it up for the turbo, then, leave it as is, and when i had my turbo stuff ready, just pop it on.

basically rebuild the engine with turbo friendly parts, then save money up for turbo, and just drop it in, does that sound decent or not?
 
R

RustBucket

New Member
Jun 8, 2003
585
0
0
Buford, GA
Feb 17, 2006
#5
  • Feb 17, 2006
  • #5
Yeah, but you're probably not going to be happy with the motor in between the rebuild and the turbo installation. The turbo pistons are dished reducing compression quite a bit which hurts power.

What I usually do when I plan a major upgraade such as this is to get all of the parts together to do everything at once. In this case, I'd get all of the parts I needed to rebuild the motor, everything I needed to install the turbo charger, and anything else that went along with the plan. Once I had everything, then I'd tear it down and do what I wanted to do.

Like Shinlee said, throw a Ranger header and a cold air setup at it in the meantime. You can probably modify the cold air setup to work with the turbo when the time comes and sell the Ranger header on ebay.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

351w turbo build.... Turbo guys teach me things...
  • Kid wita 5oh
  • Oct 22, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 23, 2025
General karthief
Engine Suggestions on an engine rebuild. Stock cam/GT40Ps or aftermarket on both for a fun weekend driver?
  • MadSquirrelTech
  • Apr 28, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
593
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 7, 2026
MadSquirrelTech
K
Engine 2000 Mustang GT - Fuel issue post-blown spark plug repair
  • kenster1092
  • Feb 26, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
286
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Mar 10, 2026
kenster1092
K
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
672
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 28, 2026
Noobz347
S
Upgrade Advice on an 89 GT Convertible NJ
  • SteakDad
  • Apr 17, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
818
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 18, 2025
limp
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?