• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

2000 4.6l cobra crate engine swap into 65/66 mustangs?

  • Thread starter Thread starter zathan
  • Start date Start date Aug 31, 2004
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
1 of 3 Next Last
Z

zathan

New Member
Apr 4, 2002
45
0
0
Aug 31, 2004
#1
  • Aug 31, 2004
  • #1
Hi, anybody know what it would take to make a crate engine like this fit in a 65/66 body mustang? Any restomod/hotrod articles about it would be helpful (online or magazine references).

2000 cobra crate engine
 
R

rebel65

Member
Feb 1, 2004
363
0
17
SF Bay Area
Aug 31, 2004
#2
  • Aug 31, 2004
  • #2
well since it is a mod motor, you would have to go to a Mustang II front end, i remeber an article about a gt350H with a cobra engine in it i will try and find it for you.
 
T

tjm73

Founding Member
Aug 3, 2000
2,418
2
48
Rush, NY
Aug 31, 2004
#3
  • Aug 31, 2004
  • #3
32 valve modular V8's are physically wider than BOSS 429's......so, the very first thing you will have to do is abandon the stock front suspension for something that will open up the engine bay. Probably a Mustang II setup. The stock front suspension towers that protrude into the engine bay are in the way and they have to go.

Mustangs & Fords did this very swap a year or two ago. It can be done.
 
W

wildstang

Founding Member
Apr 8, 1999
217
0
0
Orange, Vermont
Aug 31, 2004
#4
  • Aug 31, 2004
  • #4
You could maybe get a bolt in strut suspension set up from RPS or fatman fabrication and maybe be able to cut out enough of the shock tower (and then reinforce again to carry the spring load), then coat the valve covers with some KY jelly and slip it in.

You may also be able to get a coil over suspension upgrade from global west or a similar place that would replace the big coil spring with a much smaller diameter coil over spring and shock and maybe be able to cut enough of the shock tower out to have room.

The other definite way is to do as mentioned above, the mustang II suspension replacement.

For the cost of the engine and trans combo, you should be able to build a 302 or stroker for less with much better power in a lower rpm range, but I do not know what your intended use or purpose will be for the car.
 

allcarfan

The Answer Man
Founding Member
Apr 8, 2001
2,458
1
56
North Atlanta
Aug 31, 2004
#5
  • Aug 31, 2004
  • #5
$6300 for engine and trans assembly plus extensive modification and only 315 hp....

Or...a drop in 350hp carb gt40 crate motor and another $1000 for a nice transmission with no modifications necessary...ask yourself which is a better deal...or, are you just going for a wow factor?
 
T

tjm73

Founding Member
Aug 3, 2000
2,418
2
48
Rush, NY
Aug 31, 2004
#6
  • Aug 31, 2004
  • #6
This article has a car with a 4.6 SOHC and some info on the swap. It was all I could find.

http://www.mustangandfords.com/featuredvehicles/5202/index.html
 

jmagilto

New Member
Aug 14, 2003
19
0
1
Aug 31, 2004
#7
  • Aug 31, 2004
  • #7
I agree with the post above - the power of the mod motor is hardly worth the effort to modify the car. Get a stroker small block and run circles around the mod-motor configuration for considerably less $
 
Z

zathan

New Member
Apr 4, 2002
45
0
0
Aug 31, 2004
#8
  • Aug 31, 2004
  • #8
Thanks for the info guys. The need to do the M2 conversion means more work, although it would mean better steering/handling too... I was just playing with the idea of having a reliable and more efficient (mpg wise) late model engine in my daily driver without doing too much work myself. I've seen they fit the cammer engine and wanted to do something like that, but it's not street legal (and expensive) and I wan't to convert my daily driver to a restomod with modern driveline like that... but it's just a dream at this stage. What other solutions should I consider?
 

one2gamble

Founding Member
Feb 27, 2001
902
1
0
Monterey
Aug 31, 2004
#9
  • Aug 31, 2004
  • #9
I say snag the new XJR motor in the 65, now that would be cool.
 
R

rebel65

Member
Feb 1, 2004
363
0
17
SF Bay Area
Aug 31, 2004
#10
  • Aug 31, 2004
  • #10
what about a 351w with a t5? that's pretty modern..
 
T

tjm73

Founding Member
Aug 3, 2000
2,418
2
48
Rush, NY
Aug 31, 2004
#11
  • Aug 31, 2004
  • #11
or a sensible 331 5.0 roller motor with a T5. With 25"-26" tire and 3.50 gears it'd get out and really move and on the highway you would get 20+mpg. My '98 GT 4.6 SOHC get's 23 mpg with country/city/highway mix driving.
 
1

10secgoal

Active Member
Dec 1, 2003
2,801
3
49
San Diego
Sep 1, 2004
#12
  • Sep 1, 2004
  • #12
Although definetly not the cheapest route, I would do it in a heart beat. I wouldn't go thru all of that for reliablity and mpg though. You can fuel inject a 302 pretty easily. And contrary to popular belief, you can still get good gas mileage with a carb.
I would go thru all that for an aftermarket 32 valve motor with say a #20 huffer on it !!! The fastest mod motor in the world runs sixes in a cougar with a STOCK cobra block!!!!!
 
F

Fostang

Founding Member
May 8, 2002
1,400
0
36
Stockton, Ca
Sep 1, 2004
#13
  • Sep 1, 2004
  • #13
So much hatred for the modular motors.

A stock modular block will definatly handle much more power than a stock windsor block even a sportsman block.

A cobra crank is forged. All that is needed is a some quality H beam rods and Forged pistons and your good to go with the bottom end.

Aftermarket parts are becoming much more available.
 

Hack

15 Year Member
Mar 23, 2004
1,945
13
69
Minneapolis
Sep 1, 2004
#14
  • Sep 1, 2004
  • #14
zathan said:
Thanks for the info guys. The need to do the M2 conversion means more work, although it would mean better steering/handling too... I was just playing with the idea of having a reliable and more efficient (mpg wise) late model engine in my daily driver without doing too much work myself. I've seen they fit the cammer engine and wanted to do something like that, but it's not street legal (and expensive) and I wan't to convert my daily driver to a restomod with modern driveline like that... but it's just a dream at this stage. What other solutions should I consider?
Click to expand...
Just so you know, the M2 conversion does NOT guarantee better handling. The stock suspension is preferred for good handling. For really good handling, you'd want to go to one of the high-buck setups as suggested above.

If efficiency is the key, you could put a 6 in the car. I'd say that a mild 302 with a 5 speed is a great choice as others stated. Even with 2.79 gears, you'll have no problem spinning the tires at the line. If you're driving a lot of highway miles, keep the cruising rpm as low as possible.
 
T

tjm73

Founding Member
Aug 3, 2000
2,418
2
48
Rush, NY
Sep 2, 2004
#15
  • Sep 2, 2004
  • #15
Fostang said:
So much hatred for the modular motors.

A stock modular block will definatly handle much more power than a stock windsor block even a sportsman block.

A cobra crank is forged. All that is needed is a some quality H beam rods and Forged pistons and your good to go with the bottom end.

Aftermarket parts are becoming much more available.
Click to expand...

I don't think anyone hates the Modular engines. They're just not practical yet when you compare the power delivered for the dollar spent. If I spend $4000 on a 5.0 stroker it will absolutly decimate the Cobra crate engine which costs like $6500 not counting the costs to make it fit the car, make the computer work, etc....

The 5.0 stroker woud drop in and hook up to eveything that's already there. It's simple economics. Not hatered for the Mod motors.
 
F

Fostang

Founding Member
May 8, 2002
1,400
0
36
Stockton, Ca
Sep 2, 2004
#16
  • Sep 2, 2004
  • #16
In the end it's just money.

You can't take it with you might as well use it.
 

one2gamble

Founding Member
Feb 27, 2001
902
1
0
Monterey
Sep 2, 2004
#17
  • Sep 2, 2004
  • #17
Im telling you...pull the motor out of an XJR!!!!

but how is there a 2000 cobra crate engine There was never a 2000 cobra
 

allcarfan

The Answer Man
Founding Member
Apr 8, 2001
2,458
1
56
North Atlanta
Sep 2, 2004
#18
  • Sep 2, 2004
  • #18
I had a video of a stock block 01? cobra with a centrifugal supercharger on it...racing a C5 on the highway....

He split the crank, destroyed the block and left two rods in the road behind him.
 
T

tjm73

Founding Member
Aug 3, 2000
2,418
2
48
Rush, NY
Sep 2, 2004
#19
  • Sep 2, 2004
  • #19
one2gamble said:
but how is there a 2000 cobra crate engine There was never a 2000 cobra
Click to expand...

Yes there was, it was the 2002 Cobra that never exisited.
 
R

rebel65

Member
Feb 1, 2004
363
0
17
SF Bay Area
Sep 2, 2004
#20
  • Sep 2, 2004
  • #20
allcarfan said:
I had a video of a stock block 01? cobra with a centrifugal supercharger on it...racing a C5 on the highway....

He split the crank, destroyed the block and left two rods in the road behind him.
Click to expand...


yea..but that's an 01 dood, those were not the ones with the forged components in the engines, the 03/04 are.
 
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
1 of 3 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

K
351w engine swap
  • Killer351w
  • Jan 21, 2026
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
237
2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk- Jan 21, 2026
Killer351w
K
F
Fox 1990 Mustang GT 5.0 A9L – Engine suddenly shuts off but immediately restarts when key turned
  • FishermansFriend
  • Aug 9, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
16
Views
449
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 30, 2026
General karthief
P
Looking for others who swapped in a 4.6L engine
  • PeteFL
  • Jan 15, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
546
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jan 17, 2025
LILCBRA
K
Engine 2000 Mustang GT - Fuel issue post-blown spark plug repair
  • kenster1092
  • Feb 26, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
435
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Mar 10, 2026
kenster1092
K
J
2004 Mustang 3.8L V6 vibrations above 65 MPH and differential leaks
  • joeybuddy96
  • Mar 16, 2026
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
17
Views
737
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech Aug 29, 2026
joeybuddy96
J
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?