• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

2003 Supercharged GT

  • Thread starter Thread starter Tyson98GT
  • Start date Start date Mar 27, 2006
T

Tyson98GT

New Member
May 12, 2005
96
0
0
Mar 27, 2006
#1
  • Mar 27, 2006
  • #1
My buddy has a 2003 mustang GT that is procharged. He was wondering what the benefits of an aluminum driveshaft. Would there be any horsepower gains??
 

merc123

Active Member
Jan 27, 2003
420
2
39
North GA
Mar 27, 2006
#2
  • Mar 27, 2006
  • #2
Less rotational mass. I'm not sure about actual gains though on HP but possible a dropped ET
 

DropTopPony

Noob Slayer
Founding Member
Aug 13, 2002
2,570
3
48
south jersey
Mar 27, 2006
#3
  • Mar 27, 2006
  • #3
A guy did an extensive test/write up with it and it gained like 3rwhp on the dyno on avg over like 5 pulls...and the Carbon Fibre one gained like 3 over the aluminum. I haven't seen it posted in a few years though.
 
K

kstang69

New Member
Aug 14, 2003
153
0
0
atlanta, georgia
Mar 27, 2006
#4
  • Mar 27, 2006
  • #4
wow not very impressive...was it stock tho...supercharged would be at least twice as much i would think, i have heard you will gain back like 3-4% of drivetrain loss, which should amount to about 10hp on a stock mustang.
 

DropTopPony

Noob Slayer
Founding Member
Aug 13, 2002
2,570
3
48
south jersey
Mar 27, 2006
#5
  • Mar 27, 2006
  • #5
it was a stock bullitt if i remember correctly
 

ADRENLN

Active Member
Apr 16, 2003
2,342
3
49
NJ
Mar 28, 2006
#6
  • Mar 28, 2006
  • #6
if any hp was picked up on a d/s that would be great. im about to do a d/s soon.

ive always heard you probably wont pick up much hp, but it is less weight and rotational weight at that.

whats with the carbon fiber d/s? is that storng enough? who makes it?
 

jstreet0204

Active Member
Jun 26, 2003
939
0
36
Winston Salem, NC
Mar 28, 2006
#7
  • Mar 28, 2006
  • #7
kstang69 said:
wow not very impressive...was it stock tho...supercharged would be at least twice as much i would think, i have heard you will gain back like 3-4% of drivetrain loss, which should amount to about 10hp on a stock mustang.
Click to expand...

That doesn't really apply here. Greater improvments on a forced induction car relate to mods that effect the breathing of the engine. Also contrary to popular belief, I am a firm beleiver that drive train loss is static, not a percentage. If it takes 35hp to spin a t45 tranny with a 260hp engine, it will not suddenly take 70hp to spin it with a 520hp engine.
 
4

40oz

Member
Jan 9, 2006
499
3
18
Minneapolis
Mar 28, 2006
#8
  • Mar 28, 2006
  • #8
I wouldn't consider any benefit of an AL driveshaft to be "horsepower gained." It is more like "lower rotational mass," which means if you are gong to talk about how much HP you "gain" with an AL driveshaft, you should be talking about how much hp your new wider wheels cost you, as well.
 
4

40oz

Member
Jan 9, 2006
499
3
18
Minneapolis
Mar 28, 2006
#9
  • Mar 28, 2006
  • #9
jstreet0204 said:
Also contrary to popular belief, I am a firm beleiver that drive train loss is static, not a percentage. If it takes 35hp to spin a t45 tranny with a 260hp engine, it will not suddenly take 70hp to spin it with a 520hp engine.
Click to expand...

Yes, because we all know that when pushing two pieces of metal together, the pressure applied has nothing to do with the force required to move them :/ I suppose you also don't believe pushing on your brake pedal harder has any effect on the speed at which the car stops? Seriously, if you are pushing twice the power through a transmission, of course it is going to suck up more power through frictional losses. Any suggestion otherwise is just voodoo mechanics. Push two pieces of metal together, and try to slide them across each other. Then push them together twice as hard, and tell me it isn't any harder to slide one across the other. What do you think happens when your gears mesh?
 

jstreet0204

Active Member
Jun 26, 2003
939
0
36
Winston Salem, NC
Mar 28, 2006
#10
  • Mar 28, 2006
  • #10
40oz said:
Yes, because we all know that when pushing two pieces of metal together, the pressure applied has nothing to do with the force required to move them :/ I suppose you also don't believe pushing on your brake pedal harder has any effect on the speed at which the car stops? Seriously, if you are pushing twice the power through a transmission, of course it is going to suck up more power through frictional losses. Any suggestion otherwise is just voodoo mechanics. Push two pieces of metal together, and try to slide them across each other. Then push them together twice as hard, and tell me it isn't any harder to slide one across the other. What do you think happens when your gears mesh?
Click to expand...

You need to get your facts straight. The examples you give are incorrect. There are different types of friction.

Viscous friction (friction due to fluids, ie air, tranny fluid, rear end lube) increases as velocity increases. So the faster it goes the more friction there is. Engines that accelerate faster will experience more viscous friction.

Coulumb or dry friction stays the same no matter how fast it is going.

The gears meshing, bearings, etc. are all dry friction, and do not change regardless of the of the velocity. Your brake example is also Coulomb friction.

There are both types involved in drivetrain loss, but I beleive that the viscous friction plays a smaller role in it. That being said the majority of the loss is a static number when we are talking about engines in the 200-500hp ranges then you will be more accurate using a static number unless you can tell me the Viscous friction coefficient of the driveline.
 

DropTopPony

Noob Slayer
Founding Member
Aug 13, 2002
2,570
3
48
south jersey
Mar 28, 2006
#11
  • Mar 28, 2006
  • #11
ADRENLN said:
if any hp was picked up on a d/s that would be great. im about to do a d/s soon.

ive always heard you probably wont pick up much hp, but it is less weight and rotational weight at that.

whats with the carbon fiber d/s? is that storng enough? who makes it?
Click to expand...
PST makes aluminum and Carbon Fiber DS's for our cars...they are plenty strong and are not as wide as the aluminum DS so if you have clearance issues the CF will help.
 
0

'03GTinFLA

Member
May 29, 2004
486
0
17
St. Petersburg, FL
Mar 28, 2006
#12
  • Mar 28, 2006
  • #12
I've been reading on some other stang boards of Autozone or Advance offering the AL DS for under $200 but they are out of stock so people price match with Summit. I'll try to get some more info later tonight when I try it.
 

timeless2

Vi Veri Veni Versum Vicus Vici
Admin Dude
Nov 29, 1999
1,366
202
154
the Shadow Gallery
Mar 28, 2006
#13
  • Mar 28, 2006
  • #13
If you are interested, apparently the aluminum one for 1987-1995 years will fit with a yoke swap.
 

DropTopPony

Noob Slayer
Founding Member
Aug 13, 2002
2,570
3
48
south jersey
Mar 28, 2006
#14
  • Mar 28, 2006
  • #14
Yes i remember that write up...and if you have an auto you need to use your yolks anyway so its an economical swap using a 95 AL DS...now if i can only find one locally for 169
 

1fast03pony

Member
Jul 1, 2003
749
0
17
New york
Mar 28, 2006
#15
  • Mar 28, 2006
  • #15
more hp = more heat = more lost hp in the form of heat... fact. Energy cannot be created nor destroyed... just transformed.. into heat.
 
0

01Steeda

New Member
May 29, 2005
732
0
0
Baton Rouge, LA
Mar 28, 2006
#16
  • Mar 28, 2006
  • #16
Viscous friction coefficient of the driveline
Click to expand...

i think it is 3.1439648392179523


just a guess
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

J
High idle 2003 Mach 1
  • JohnnyUtah
  • Mar 29, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
127
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Mar 31, 2026
JohnnyUtah
J
M
Help! 2003 GT misfire when hot
  • Modular03
  • Feb 10, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
314
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Feb 13, 2026
Mustang5L5
A
Fuel Capable fuel system for +600hp
  • Avia.tuned
  • Feb 24, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
1
Views
84
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Feb 24, 2026
squeak93
F
2003 mustang gt 4.6
  • firestorm596
  • Mar 24, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
550
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Apr 25, 2025
firestorm596
F
A
Procharger install/prep questions
  • ahratrew
  • Nov 22, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
317
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Nov 26, 2025
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?