• Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech

2005 Mach 1

  • Thread starter Thread starter YellowMach69
  • Start date Start date Dec 13, 2004
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

YellowMach69

Founding Member
Aug 5, 2002
371
0
16
buffalo new york
Dec 13, 2004
#1
  • Dec 13, 2004
  • #1
Im very sorry if this was mentioned already , I really tried the search in forum for this topic, But has anyone heard or know of any confirmation of one being built?I found a picture of a proto
[/IMG] type
 
T

TomServo92

New Member
Dec 22, 2003
517
0
0
Texas
Dec 13, 2004
#2
  • Dec 13, 2004
  • #2
YellowMach69 said:
Im very sorry if this was mentioned already , I really tried the search in forum for this topic, But has anyone heard or know of any confirmation of one being built?I found a picture of a proto
[/IMG] type
Click to expand...

That's just a photoshop that someone did using the concept Mustang as the base. There are only rumors of a possible 2006 special edition. It might be a Mach, might be a Boss....
 

admdavs

New Member
Feb 25, 2004
369
0
0
Chicago
Dec 13, 2004
#3
  • Dec 13, 2004
  • #3
I'd rather see a Boss over another Mach 1!
 
B

blackonblack05

New Member
Oct 27, 2004
27
0
0
Indiana
Dec 13, 2004
#4
  • Dec 13, 2004
  • #4
I'm not too familiar with old school. Which was the more potent pony back in the day, the mach or the boss? Whichever one was faster then thats the edition i would want on the SE's
 

JonJon

Founding Member
Aug 16, 2002
4,801
1
68
back in Marylands
Dec 13, 2004
#5
  • Dec 13, 2004
  • #5
bullitt rims?
 

thunderstorm144

New Member
Nov 24, 2004
135
0
0
Alabama
Dec 13, 2004
#6
  • Dec 13, 2004
  • #6
Photoshop

But I like the concept. I agree the bullits would be a bad choice. I have them on my car but if I were paying a premium for a special edition, I'd want special edition wheels to go with.

I like the louvers on the side windows. Really a throwback!
 
R

Runfox

New Member
Nov 1, 2004
60
0
0
Dec 13, 2004
#7
  • Dec 13, 2004
  • #7
blackonblack05 said:
I'm not too familiar with old school. Which was the more potent pony back in the day, the mach or the boss? Whichever one was faster then thats the edition i would want on the SE's
Click to expand...


Go to BradBarnnets web site http://bradbarnett.net/mustangs/, the best total info on all MUstangs. He has hp listings for all years and you can see the Hp for all the engines.

The old Mustangs and the new are too different to compare .The old Mustangs had several engine choices so its hard to compare and I'm sure we wont have engine choices, it will be a GT with set engine or a Mach or Boss with its set engine.
 

GT-03

Member
Dec 12, 2003
630
1
16
Dec 13, 2004
#8
  • Dec 13, 2004
  • #8
YellowMach69 said:
I really tried the search in forum for this topic, But has anyone heard or know of any confirmation of one being built?
Click to expand...

The future Mach 1 discussion, unfortunately, is buried in the 2007 Cobra discussion topic (forum) because the "reliable rumor" on which this is a based, contains info about both.

However, I think it is too late for a 2005 Mach 1 this year.
 

sapperstang78

Founding Member
Mar 24, 2002
101
0
0
Raleigh, NC
Dec 16, 2004
#9
  • Dec 16, 2004
  • #9
I hope they don't make another Mach anytime soon.
 
D

Darkhorse845

Banned
Nov 17, 2004
101
0
0
Las Vegas,Nevada
Dec 16, 2004
#10
  • Dec 16, 2004
  • #10
Thats different!
 

Dotanukie

New Member
Dec 2, 2004
69
0
0
Hillsborough, New Jersey
Dec 16, 2004
#11
  • Dec 16, 2004
  • #11
I'm not too familiar with old school. Which was the more potent pony back in the day, the mach or the boss?
Click to expand...

Well, thats hard to say as there were at least two engine options for both cars for just about all years they were produced. In 69, the first year both the mach and the boss were offered, you could get either the Boss 302 or the Boss 429. The Boss 302 motor was basically a windsor block with the 351C-4V heads grafted on, with some changes made in the casting to get the water jackets and such to line up. This motor didn't make a whole lot of power down low, it all came from the top end, same as the later 351C-4V motor which shared the same high flow heads. This didn't make it particularly suited to the street, but thats not what Ford had in mind. This motor was developed for the Trans-Am racing series, and it did quite well there. The Boss 429 was a different animal, this was Fords foray into the world of hemi-head engines, with this motor being developed for NASCAR if I remember correctly, and very few of either of these cars were produced (maybe someone else has numbers, I don't have my red book in front of me). In the 69 mach you could get the 351 (both 2V and 4V) the 428 CJ and SCJ, and I believe the 390 also was still offered. The 428 CJ and SCJ were the big dogs, and were potent on the street. In 70 things stayed pretty much the same for the bosses. In the mach you could now get the 351's, both windsor and cleveland motors, and the 428's, but the 390 went away altogether. 71 was a big change, the mustang itself got longer, lower, wider, and heavier. The boss 302 was dropped, they introduced the boss 351, which was a cleveland, and the boss 429 was no longer a hemi head monster. In the mach the base engine was now the 302, and you could get the 351's and the 429 (CJ, CJ-R, and SCJ-R) as well. 71 was the last year for the bosses, leaving the mach as the only high performance choice for 72. The 429 went away, leaving a downrated 302 as the standard motor and the 351 CJ and 351 HO as the high performance choices, but they were no where near as potent as they had been just a year or two before. In 73 things got even worse, the standard mach 302 was again downrated, and there was only one 351, the CJ, and it was downrated as well. When the mustang II roled out there were cobra editions and a mach also in various years, but the only V8 offered was the 302, and it was so choked out by smog gear and cats that power output was pretty sad. My memory is a little fuzzy on some bits and pieces of this, if anyone catches an error my apologies. This is of course very condensed.

As to your question specifically, its a matter of opinion. Alot of people consider the hemi head boss 429 to be the baddest mustang ever built, I guess it was the Cobra R of it's day, only it couldn't handle worth a damn. Dream car garage on speed channel did an 8 car muscle car shootout a while back, and the boss 429 was the winner against some pretty heavy competition. The boss easily smoked (no pun intended) them all in the burnout contest.
 
S

slegos888stang

New Member
Sep 29, 2004
123
0
0
Dec 16, 2004
#12
  • Dec 16, 2004
  • #12
sapperstang78 said:
I hope they don't make another Mach anytime soon.
Click to expand...
ford said they wouldnt, however if this reliable info is true sorry but we will have a 5.4L n/a 370hp mach 1
 
S

slp352

Member
Oct 19, 2004
42
0
7
Peoria,IL
Dec 16, 2004
#13
  • Dec 16, 2004
  • #13
Yes the Boss 429 motor was developed for NASCAR. NASCAR rules dictated that so many vehicles needed to be produced with the motor in order to qualify for racing; well this is where things got interesting. As most of you know the mustang never raced NASCAR, this duty was left to the taledegas and cyclones. Now the rules never said the motor had to be sold in the vehicle that you raced and since ford seemed to have bigger balls back then they stuffed that motor into the mustang. The Boss 429 was definitely faster then the Boss 302 in a straight line, but when the road gets twisty the 302 will out run a 429. The Boss 302 actually could only muster about a 7.0 second 0-60 time. It only had 290hp. The Boss 302 was only built to qualify for trans am racing. The interesting thing about the Trans Am series is that it spawned a special mustang, a special camaro we call a Z-28, a firebird called a Trans AM, an AAR Cuda, a T/A challenger, and I believe the cougar eliminator, not to mention some American motors Javelins, mark Donahue I think.
 
N

NumberWon

New Member
Apr 17, 2004
15
0
0
Dec 16, 2004
#14
  • Dec 16, 2004
  • #14
sapperstang78 said:
I hope they don't make another Mach anytime soon.
Click to expand...
Why? How can anyone who is a real Mustang fan not want the Mustang to get even better? And with the new look, how can they not come back with the Mach 1?
 

JonJon

Founding Member
Aug 16, 2002
4,801
1
68
back in Marylands
Dec 17, 2004
#15
  • Dec 17, 2004
  • #15
NumberWon said:
Why? How can anyone who is a real Mustang fan not want the Mustang to get even better? And with the new look, how can they not come back with the Mach 1?
Click to expand...
because they own a mach and exclusivity is nice.
 
B

BLKGT03

New Member
Apr 8, 2003
20
0
0
Wichita KS
Dec 17, 2004
#16
  • Dec 17, 2004
  • #16
slegos888stang said:
ford said they wouldnt, however if this reliable info is true sorry but we will have a 5.4L n/a 370hp mach 1
Click to expand...

I am interested in that, When and who said they would never make another Mach 1, about a year and a half I had some dumb a$$ salesman trying to sell me a Mach for $1000 over sticker because it was so limmited. Ford had already said the car was nolonger limited right after it came out. A few
months ago I could buy them for invoice all day long. Every thing I have read and everyone I ave talked to says the car is slated to be back in 06. I canceled my 05 GT and desided to wait for the mach. If it looks as good as the car above, I will have one, no dout about that. I love that shaker
 

GT-03

Member
Dec 12, 2003
630
1
16
Dec 18, 2004
#17
  • Dec 18, 2004
  • #17
BLKGT03 said:
Ford had already said the car was nolonger limited right after it came out. A few
months ago I could buy them for invoice all day long.
Click to expand...

I don't think that Ford ever said Mach 1 would no longer be limited. Ford just stopped saying it was limited. I fine-line distinction, I know.

Ford did announce that the Mach 1 would continue through the 2004 model year before the very first 2003 model rolled off the assembly line. So, by the time anyone accepted delivery on on their 2003 Mach 1, they should have known that it was no longer going to be limited. I can't blame Ford though. I think this change was due, at least in part, to the people directly contacting Bill Ford, back in the summer of 2002, and begging him to make more so that they could get one.

By the time production stopped, Ford had ended up building more than there were people wanting them. So, you are noted, prices dropped to invoice (or less with rebates).
 

merlinsteele

New Member
Nov 21, 2004
68
0
0
Oklahoma
Dec 18, 2004
#18
  • Dec 18, 2004
  • #18
I'm glad you posted the pic. They've GOT to come out with a car like this. I like everything I see on it so far. If I knew they were coming out with one, I'd save my money. I probably will, anyway, if I can...just ....hold...out...
 

merlinsteele

New Member
Nov 21, 2004
68
0
0
Oklahoma
Dec 18, 2004
#19
  • Dec 18, 2004
  • #19
radical

I found this pic doing a search. I hope I get the link alright. If not pre-apologies and I will continue to try to fix it.

http://www.stangbangers.com/Ren_Mach1Purple_Wallpaper.jpg
 

PerformanceNut

New Member
Dec 8, 2004
31
0
0
Omaha, NE
Dec 18, 2004
#20
  • Dec 18, 2004
  • #20
I like the original Mach image better. Graphics are in a better area and the louver on the rear quarter is nicer.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

J
2003 Mach 1 Wiring
  • JohnnyUtah
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
77
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Mar 23, 2026
squeak93
Interior and Upholstery Waterproofing interior
  • MementoMori
  • Jun 14, 2025
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
113
2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk- Jun 14, 2025
MementoMori
Progress Thread The Mach Returns - Update/build thread
  • squeak93
  • Feb 20, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
255
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jun 1, 2026
squeak93
P
Air Fuel ratio bung location.
  • Praetorious
  • Feb 7, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
39
Views
850
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 11, 2026
Noobz347
2
Electrical mayhem
  • 2000ElectricGreen
  • Mar 13, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
208
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Mar 24, 2026
2000ElectricGreen
2
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?