• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

289 or 302

  • Thread starter Thread starter 6FIVE_STANG
  • Start date Start date Feb 25, 2007

6FIVE_STANG

New Member
Jul 2, 2006
142
0
0
San Jose, CA
Feb 25, 2007
#1
  • Feb 25, 2007
  • #1
i have a 289 in my '65 right now. i want to have about 350-400hp. can i achieve this in a 289 or am i better of getting a 302? i know a 302 can be stroked to a 347 but can a 289?? and if so, will it be just as reliable as a 302?
 

Stanger007

Founding Member
Sep 26, 2001
2,015
2
46
Baton Rouge, LA
Feb 25, 2007
#2
  • Feb 25, 2007
  • #2
350-400 natrually aspirated horsepower at the wheels will require a LOT of daily driver sacrifices from a 289/302. If your goal is a daily driven car you may want to look at overall torque versus peak horsepower.

As the horsepower level goes up, you quickly find the next weakest link in the drivetrain. Ask me how I know.

There's no replacement for displacement... if you want high hp but don't want to jump up to a 351-based block which would get you to your goal EASILY and RELIABLY, I'd go with a roller 302 stroked to 347 with a well matched H/C/I combo.

Wes
 

zookeeper

Founding Member
Aug 25, 2001
3,415
63
109
Rogue River, Oregon
Feb 25, 2007
#3
  • Feb 25, 2007
  • #3
What do you want the car to do? Just saying "I want 350hp" is not going to help you reach any goals of performance. If you want the car to run in the 12's at the strip, then worry about that, not a vague hp number Plus, realize that most of your gains will be done with the chassis, not the motor. Trying to get it into the 12's with stock springs and 3:00 open gears won't cut it. At any rate, you can build a mild 351W that will live day in and day out, put out 350hp with no sweat and be cheaper in the long run than a 350hp, 302 based 347. But before you ever turna wrench, sit down and be honest about what you're trying to acheive with your build up.
 

6FIVE_STANG

New Member
Jul 2, 2006
142
0
0
San Jose, CA
Feb 26, 2007
#4
  • Feb 26, 2007
  • #4
froget it!!!! im goin with my 351w!
probably stroke it to a 393 or 408.
 

ratio411

Founding Member
Apr 21, 2002
3,870
73
109
Pensacola FL
Feb 26, 2007
#5
  • Feb 26, 2007
  • #5
393 stroker doesn't cost much more than a full 351 rebuild.
A cast crank can be had for 2 or 3 hundred...
Then the thing uses cheaper 302 pistons on stock 351w rods.
If you figure the cost of turning a crank and buying 351 pistons, it's darn near the same price.
Can't beat it with a stick!
Dave
 

1320stang

Founding Member
Nov 13, 1998
4,329
23
89
Edmond, Oklahoma
Feb 26, 2007
#6
  • Feb 26, 2007
  • #6
I had a 289 that made about 400hp N/A. It had aluminum rods, 351w iron heads, 12.7:1 pistons, a solid roller cam, Tunnel Ram with dual 660 center squirters and got about 8 passes and return road trips out of 5 gallons of 112. It had a Jerico 4-speed, 5.67 gears and 9x30 slicks and ran low 11's in the quarter at around 118 mph and weighed 3000#.

I wouldn't necesarily call it streetable.

The main difference between a 289 and a 302 are the crank and rods (piston pin height is different as well). A stroker kit replaces the crank, rods and pistons. A 347 kit would be the same in a 289 block as it would in a 302 block.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

J
Cobra 289 motor & parts
  • James Werstiuk
  • May 20, 2026
  • What is it Worth?!?!?
Replies
2
Views
68
What is it Worth?!?!? May 20, 2026
Noobz347
T
Engine 1970 302 boss block
  • TOM B
  • Jan 4, 2025
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
3
Views
400
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Jan 14, 2025
lqbbe
L
P
67 Mustang, with the 302 want to convert auto back to the original manual
  • Pdunn
  • May 3, 2026
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
2
Views
93
Classic Mustang Specific Tech May 7, 2026
Mcmahst
L
New here from Maine
  • lobster
  • Mar 2, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
19
Views
467
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Mar 5, 2026
lobster
L
S
1965 Mustang with 80s 5.0 engine in it Power Steering hose or connection ID?
  • spearce
  • May 19, 2026
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
2
Views
64
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Jun 8, 2026
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?