• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Engine 28oz vs 50oz imbalance

  • Thread starter Thread starter madspeed
  • Start date Start date Dec 4, 2012

madspeed

Colonel Mustard
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
8,914
1,332
204
a van down by the river
Dec 4, 2012
#1
  • Dec 4, 2012
  • #1
What exactly does this mean and why would one be chosen over the other. While tinkering with my 89 with 333ci engine, I noticed the balancer clearly stamped 28 oz. I thought 50 oz was the 5.0 way no?
 

srtthis

the guy doing it does every local racers rear end
15 Year Member
Jul 3, 2009
5,129
1,666
204
Maryland
Dec 4, 2012
#2
  • Dec 4, 2012
  • #2
stock 5.0HO is a 50oz imbalance. the stroker kit your builder used may have been a 28oz imbalance.
 
R

Rmoore45

Member
Jun 5, 2011
142
0
17
Dec 4, 2012
#3
  • Dec 4, 2012
  • #3
Most aftermarket rotating assemblies are 28oz imbalance. I'm not sure why they would choose 28 over the 50 though, I thought that the 50 oz imbalance made the motor run a little smoother.
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Dec 4, 2012
#4
  • Dec 4, 2012
  • #4
As per the Coast High Performance Q&A

Although Coast High Performance has plenty of experience in balancing your rotating assemblies and builds to whatever requirements you prefer, we highly recommend choosing an external 28 ounce balance over a 50 ounce balance in Small Block Ford applications (unless you have purchased an Internal balance crankshaft).

In the late model 5.0 builds, Ford's factories primarily utilized 50 ounce balancing. The 50oz. cranks used in these builds were designed entirely different from today's aftermarket performance crankshafts; the primary difference is in the size and material content of the counterweights. These cranks were designed to be economical, utilizing less material in the crank (notably, smaller counterweights) in order to lower manufacturing costs, as a result allowing only a 50 ounce balance.

Today's aftermarket crankshafts were designed primarily with 28oz. balancing in mind. There is much more material in a 28oz. crank than a comparable factory 50oz. one (see photos below)--the difference being that crankshafts designed for 28oz. balancing utilize full counterweights and less end-weight for better stability, thereby improving the structural integrity, strength and performance capability of the crankshaft.

While it is possible to balance an aftermarket crankshaft to 50oz, the amount of material that must be taken out will leave the crankshaft heavy at its ends. At high RPM use, this leaves the crank prone to flexing and stress at its center. This problem is greatly minimized using a 28oz. balance, as it keeps the integrity of the crankshaft intact since less material will have to be removed from the counterweights. Another reason why we prefer to use 28oz. balancing is because the extra holes drilled into the counterweights of a 50oz-balanced crank will cause aeration of the oil, minimizing its life and increasing engine wear over time.

View attachment 138550
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
816
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
45
Views
2K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 4, 2026
nickyb
J
Progress Thread Family member 1989 GT- Backstory and updates
  • JRC99
  • Apr 19, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 26, 2025
JRC99
J
J
89 2.3 LX running rich, hesitation on acceleration, high and hanging idle Help!
  • jpstucky
  • Jun 13, 2023
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech
Replies
4
Views
3K
2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech Jun 15, 2023
jpstucky
J
SN Mustang Magnum T56 swap
  • revhead347
  • May 24, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
15
Views
6K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jun 28, 2026
GearHeadGuy
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?