• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

3.73 Or 3.90

  • Thread starter Thread starter whitesnake1994
  • Start date Start date Aug 8, 2005
W

whitesnake1994

New Member
Jul 11, 2005
70
0
0
Shelby Township, MI
Aug 8, 2005
#1
  • Aug 8, 2005
  • #1
To those of you who have 3.73s do you regret not getting 3.90 or even 4.10s? Also what would be the difference in RPMs at about 80 mph between the three gears? Also i am not planning on putting a power adder on if that makes a difference, so what do you reccomend for me? Thanks
 

Kevin R.

New Member
Jun 3, 2004
473
0
0
Ohio
Aug 8, 2005
#2
  • Aug 8, 2005
  • #2
I have 3.73's and an automatic, so my rpm's at 80 would be around 3500-4000. It kind of sucks for highway driving and since I kind of have a heavy foot I am glad sometimes I don't have a higher gear.

But then again taking off from stop lights I wish I had 4.10's.
 
8

88GT460

New Member
Sep 23, 2004
338
0
0
Arkansas
Aug 8, 2005
#3
  • Aug 8, 2005
  • #3
3.90 are a great gear. I got 4.30's though.
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Aug 8, 2005
#4
  • Aug 8, 2005
  • #4
There are quite a few programs around that let you plug in the value of your tire size, mph, ratio, etc. to see how various things in your drive train effect each other.

Don't have any of those links on this pc but search around and you can find them.

Later
Grady
 
T

Touring23

Founding Member
Dec 29, 2001
294
0
0
Washington
Aug 8, 2005
#5
  • Aug 8, 2005
  • #5
This is from my spreadsheet, condensed table for cruise, for use with 255/45.17 and 5spd (can someone double-check my math please):

mph 3.08 3.55 3.73 3.90 4.10
35 1865 2149 1685 1762 1852
45 1789 2062 2167 2266 2382
70 1892 2181 2292 2396 2519
80 2163 2493 2619 2738 2879
100 2704 3116 3274 3423 3599

Yes, I wish I had gone to 3.90; 3.73 is much better than 3.08, but it wasn't enough for me. But then again, it's not the DD and my only interest in mileage is for tuning and maintenance.
To make a recommendation, we need more info about the car (vert? big wheels?) and it's usage (track warrior? Trailer queen? Daily interstate commuter?)
 

MysteryMachine

Active Member
Jun 21, 2003
1,835
2
39
Parkesburg, PA
Aug 8, 2005
#6
  • Aug 8, 2005
  • #6
good question. my dad keeps telling me i should go with 4.10s (old muscle car guy) but everybody tells me 3.73's it will be nice to know what you guys have to say about this.
 

94-302-vert

Active Member
Aug 16, 2004
1,947
2
36
NE CT
Aug 8, 2005
#7
  • Aug 8, 2005
  • #7
I am happy with my 3.73's and manual trans. There are days I want to jsut clip along on the highway and I wish I had 3.55's but there hasn't been a day yet that I wished I went with 3.90's or 4.10's. At 134k miles my motor doesn't need that revving.

Now on the other hand I haven't taken it to the track yet either, maybe if I did that more oftern I would want 4.10's.
 

mootang

New Member
Dec 5, 2004
907
0
0
texas
Aug 8, 2005
#8
  • Aug 8, 2005
  • #8
i honestly wish that i went with 4.10's instead of 3.73's. they put you in a better power band when you cross the finish line in the 1/4.

i think the gain in performance would be worth the slight loss in drivability.
 

pleasehelp

New Member
Mar 11, 2003
686
0
0
Poplar Grove, Il
Aug 8, 2005
#9
  • Aug 8, 2005
  • #9
Here is a Speed/RPM calculator link: http://www.car-videos.com/tools/spe...o7=&Redline=6250&Increment=500&B1=Recalculate

It is already setup for 3.90 rear end gear and 315/35/17 size rear wheel. But you can plug in any combo you want to find out speed and rpm.
 
W

whitesnake1994

New Member
Jul 11, 2005
70
0
0
Shelby Township, MI
Aug 8, 2005
#10
  • Aug 8, 2005
  • #10
i have 94 cobra coupe and it is my daily driver. it has 94000 miles on it. L/T headers, O/R H, and flowmaster A/T catback. underdrive pullies and a drop in k&n.
also how much worse is the gas milege b/t 3.73 and 3.90, i do a bit of highway driving and usually drive around 80. Thanks Again
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Aug 8, 2005
#11
  • Aug 8, 2005
  • #11
Here is one that has mph included

http://www.allfordmustangs.com/Detailed/608.shtml

Later
Grady
 
M

MarkFJ40

Member
Jun 3, 2005
44
0
6
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Aug 8, 2005
#12
  • Aug 8, 2005
  • #12
I've got 3.73's and I am just hitting 4th at the end of the 1/4 mile and I wish I had 4.10's.
 

18mustangs

New Member
Jun 8, 2005
533
1
0
Virginia Beach, VA
Aug 8, 2005
#13
  • Aug 8, 2005
  • #13
94-302-vert said:
I am happy with my 3.73's and manual trans. There are days I want to jsut clip along on the highway and I wish I had 3.55's but there hasn't been a day yet that I wished I went with 3.90's or 4.10's. At 134k miles my motor doesn't need that revving.

Now on the other hand I haven't taken it to the track yet either, maybe if I did that more oftern I would want 4.10's.
Click to expand...

I used to think about upgrading to 4.10s from my 3.73s, but I've got enough traction issues already! honestly 3.73s are great all around, not bad on the highway and good in town.
 
M

mackey

Active Member
Jan 25, 2003
1,284
1
38
Beverly, Massachusetts
Aug 8, 2005
#14
  • Aug 8, 2005
  • #14
All motor 4.10
Power Added: 3:73

Best is in the middle if you can't decide. 3:90
 
T

Touring23

Founding Member
Dec 29, 2001
294
0
0
Washington
Aug 8, 2005
#15
  • Aug 8, 2005
  • #15
final5-0 said:
Here is one that has mph included

http://www.allfordmustangs.com/Detailed/608.shtml

Later
Grady
Click to expand...
That's a nice calculator. Good find. It agrees with my calculations, FWIW.

also how much worse is the gas milege b/t 3.73 and 3.90, i do a bit of highway driving and usually drive around 80. Thanks Again
Click to expand...
Statistically I haven't seen much change from 3.08 to 3.73, approximately 0.2mpg, and that's a big change in gearing; I'll be really surprised if you can measure a difference in mileage between the 3.73 and the 3.90, they're so close. Either one should do the trick.
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Aug 8, 2005
#16
  • Aug 8, 2005
  • #16
Kevin R. said:
I have 3.73's and an automatic, so my rpm's at 80 would be around 3500-4000. It kind of sucks for highway driving and since I kind of have a heavy foot I am glad sometimes I don't have a higher gear.
Click to expand...

On what planet does a 3.73 geared automatic AODE car run 3500-4000 rpm on the highway @ 80 You'd either had to forgot to put it in OD or have a C4 transmission. My friends AOD 4.10 geared car does 2500 rpm at around 70ish.

In general the best overall gear for the typical person is a 3.73 for a 5spd car and 4.10 for an automatic. This is just in general. I know with my car the best gear would be a 4.30, but I think a 4.10 is what i'll do down the road to replace my too tiny 3.73's that make noise.
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Aug 8, 2005
#17
  • Aug 8, 2005
  • #17
Touring23 said:
That's a nice calculator. Good find. It agrees with my calculations, FWIW.


Statistically I haven't seen much change from 3.08 to 3.73, approximately 0.2mpg, and that's a big change in gearing; I'll be really surprised if you can measure a difference in mileage between the 3.73 and the 3.90, they're so close. Either one should do the trick.
Click to expand...

You are so right on the money about ratios that are really close. For a street driven car, those close to each other ratios are a toss up so go with the higher number for a bit more zip. It just ain't gonna use any more gas or turn any more rpm.

A good rule of thumb...you gota go at least 1/2 a turn to tell any difference.

Lots of peeps fret way too much with gear ratios. Just a little math would ease their mind and that math deals in the facts, not opinions.

Later
Grady
 

mo_dingo

20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 26, 2003
3,031
2
58
Tucson, AZ
Aug 8, 2005
#18
  • Aug 8, 2005
  • #18
mootang said:
i honestly wish that i went with 4.10's instead of 3.73's. they put you in a better power band when you cross the finish line in the 1/4.

i think the gain in performance would be worth the slight loss in drivability.
Click to expand...

Ditto that...regret sucks.

Just means I need more power.....muuaahhhahahahha.
Scott
 
N

Nobody

Founding Member
May 9, 2000
2,515
0
0
Kenmore, WA
Aug 8, 2005
#19
  • Aug 8, 2005
  • #19
If you run the stock tire height and plan on trapping faster than 108 then you won't want 4.10's. You will run out of RPM. If you don't care about the drag strip or you are trapping well below 108, then get 4.10's.
 
M

mackey

Active Member
Jan 25, 2003
1,284
1
38
Beverly, Massachusetts
Aug 9, 2005
#20
  • Aug 9, 2005
  • #20
Nobody said:
If you run the stock tire height and plan on trapping faster than 108 then you won't want 4.10's. You will run out of RPM. If you don't care about the drag strip or you are trapping well below 108, then get 4.10's.
Click to expand...


That really matters what combo you are running. With the stock H/C/I you will not make power past 5500. If you have a higher revving setup. Lets say your car makes power to 6500 then the 4.10s will be ideal or you might need a steeper gear.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Need some camshaft guru advice on power loss from supercharger to nitrous
  • TTSaleen
  • Dec 1, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
18
Views
589
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 29, 2025
revhead347
Big Posi and Neg wire from Starter to Battery and Alt wires..........
  • from6to8
  • Feb 9, 2026
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
1
Views
192
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Feb 9, 2026
AeroCoupe
M
Too much for me to repair in my current housing situation
  • My Drama Magnet 04 Gt
  • Apr 1, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
8
Views
250
The Welcome Wagon Apr 14, 2026
Noobz347
J
2004 Mustang 3.8L V6 vibrations above 65 MPH and differential leaks
  • joeybuddy96
  • Mar 16, 2026
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
14
Views
421
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech Thursday at 8:57 AM
TPony
0
V6 to V8 Swap info
  • 02_2v_Curtis
  • Jan 11, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
589
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jan 11, 2026
02_2v_Curtis
0
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?