Thats pretty good. But with that much power, you should be pullin on me in the quarter mile, not the other way around. Your 60' time is almost .2 better than me, yet, im finishing quicker in the quarter. I know a manual trans has a lot to do with that, but an extra 25hp would deifnately even things out.
Yours actually doesnt spike as bad as most of the ones i've seen. I remember some guy claiming his GT had 343rwhp or somin like that with just a tune. Dont think he ever posted a dyno chart, but im pretty sure it had a peak in it just like that.
Yours actually doesnt spike as bad as most of the ones i've seen. I remember some guy claiming his GT had 343rwhp or somin like that with just a tune. Dont think he ever posted a dyno chart, but im pretty sure it had a peak in it just like that.
, but the NUMBER of valves is not what's important, it's the Volumetric flow of the valves. For instance, "Stock 4V heads flow 260 cfm intake and 201 cfm exhaust @ .550." That's pretty dang good for a stock head, but I just purchased a set a P&P heads for my 3.8L Pushrod V6 that flow 235 cfm intake @ the same lift. Not too shabby for a STOCK head w/ a little P&P. With these heads, the stiffer valve springs, new cam, and RR's that are all on the way or in my posession, my car will rev to 6000 w/ ease, so it is certainly doable to rev the 4.0 to 6000+ (I would have thought the redline was near that, anyway) especially being SOHC. Also, there are several companies that make much better flowing heads than that, too. I believe that some have eclipsed the 300 cfm mark, which is amazing. Of course, you have to shell out some money, but if Super Six Motorsports' (mentioned earlier to already have 4.0 parts) 3.8 can make 280whp N/A and they still say there's room to grow, I'm sure the 4.0 can do the same.
). Okay. Back to waiting for a two screw whipple for the 6 that costs less the $5,000.