• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Engine 302 Vs. 302 H.o.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Justin422
  • Start date Start date Nov 26, 2015

Justin422

Member
Nov 21, 2015
29
5
13
Nov 26, 2015
#1
  • Nov 26, 2015
  • #1
Besides the firing order being different, what other differences are there between the 302 and the 302 H.O. engines? Hope this is the right spot for this question.
 

mikestang63

SN Certified Technician
Aug 27, 2012
11,606
8,859
214
In the garage
Nov 26, 2015
#2
  • Nov 26, 2015
  • #2
The Block, crank and rods are the same, the differences are

  • HO 5.0 came with 225 HP non HO 5.0 had 150 HP
  • HO have E7 heads, non HO use the E6 heads.
  • HO have forged psistons with valve reliefs, non HO are cast and flat top
  • HO has a hotter cam than the non HO. Some non HO are flat tappet cams.
  • All HOs have a roller timing chain while pre 1988 non HO do not
  • HO motors have 19# injectors, non HO use14#
  • The HO upper Intake and throttle body opening 58MM vs non HO 50MM
  • HO have ss headers, NON HO 5.0 has cast iron exaust manifolds
 
Reactions: Mustang5L5 and Justin422

stykthyn

I want to measure mine. It doesn't look that tall.
15 Year Member
Jul 6, 2006
5,232
2,652
223
gainesville
Nov 27, 2015
#3
  • Nov 27, 2015
  • #3
I've never seen stainless headers on a stock engine.
 

90sickfox

Wasn't a pretty sight...and I've got big hands
SN Certified Technician
Mar 2, 2015
6,945
5,816
213
Nov 27, 2015
#4
  • Nov 27, 2015
  • #4
The tubular style factory 5.0 headers used to be pretty stainless steel before the heat and time rusted them....interesting.
 

Phillip123

Active Member
Jan 5, 2015
125
17
28
Nov 27, 2015
#5
  • Nov 27, 2015
  • #5
the 87-93 ho motors have forged pistons,im pretty sure the 86 ho has forged pistons but theres no fly cut so u cant fun a good size cam.the regular 302 say in a crown vic has cast pistons and usally the e6 lower compression heads.the cam in a ho has the better firing order 13726548 where the reg 302 has the ty firing order. the blocks are the same. the crank is the same and the rods are the same.
ps 87-93 ho motors are a dime a dozen
 

Justin422

Member
Nov 21, 2015
29
5
13
Nov 27, 2015
#6
  • Nov 27, 2015
  • #6
So I can use a cam for a 302 in an HO?

Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk
 

stykthyn

I want to measure mine. It doesn't look that tall.
15 Year Member
Jul 6, 2006
5,232
2,652
223
gainesville
Nov 27, 2015
#7
  • Nov 27, 2015
  • #7
The cam question is tricky. It depends on firing order, lifter style, valve clearance,....can't say that any 302 cam would work.
As to HO motors being cheap and a dime a dozen? Deals are out there if you look, but the prices are well up over what they were a few years ago and the days of pulling a running explorer engine from the jy are practically behind us as well.

A solid functioning engine/tranny will fetch over a grand these days. That's over a third of what most of these cars are worth.
 

mikestang63

SN Certified Technician
Aug 27, 2012
11,606
8,859
214
In the garage
Nov 27, 2015
#8
  • Nov 27, 2015
  • #8
stykthyn said:
I've never seen stainless headers on a stock engine.
Click to expand...
You didnt look hard enough,
 

Justin422

Member
Nov 21, 2015
29
5
13
Nov 27, 2015
#9
  • Nov 27, 2015
  • #9
I got the motor (block, pistons, heads, shorty headers, cover) for $100 from a friend. I got a coworker who has a x303 roller cam new in box and crankshaft for $100 as well. I paid $800 for the mustang roller itself.

Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk
 

stykthyn

I want to measure mine. It doesn't look that tall.
15 Year Member
Jul 6, 2006
5,232
2,652
223
gainesville
Nov 27, 2015
#10
  • Nov 27, 2015
  • #10
X303 will work on your roller block. It's not ideal though. If you run it I would suggest 3.73 gears.
 
Reactions: Justin422
S

Scottybronco

Member
Jan 16, 2019
41
1
8
Bc
Jan 16, 2019
#11
  • Jan 16, 2019
  • #11
Will the e7 heads fit on a non ho bottomed without the valve reliefs
 

General karthief

wonder how much it would cost to ship you a pair
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 25, 2016
27,925
10,572
203
polk county florida
Jan 16, 2019
#12
  • Jan 16, 2019
  • #12
Heads will fit no problem, when you install higher lift cams is when you have ptv problems,
 

giddyup306

Founding Member
Oct 22, 2002
3,041
2
59
Feb 19, 2019
#13
  • Feb 19, 2019
  • #13
Justin422 said:
So I can use a cam for a 302 in an HO?

Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Yes. You need to change the firing order tho (as mentioned).
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

D
Engine HO cam in non HO roller block ‘93 f150
  • DanC1993f150
  • Mar 21, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
333
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 29, 2026
General karthief
J
can you use the heads off a H O 302 to put on a regular 302 engine
  • Jan H
  • Feb 25, 2026
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
6
Views
366
Other Auto Tech May 17, 2026
nickyb
Weber Carburetor tuning help
  • SchwarzStock
  • Jul 6, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
83
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jul 19, 2026
SchwarzStock
H
Forced Induction On3 Turbo Kit- Parts list NEEDED - 302 Stock Motor
  • Hirothecool1
  • Feb 27, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 7, 2026
slow84lx
S
D
Foxbody Misfire 5.0 Swap
  • DPORTER0729
  • May 2, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
620
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 13, 2025
90sickfox
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?