• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

306 vs 347

  • Thread starter Thread starter 87stang306
  • Start date Start date Jan 19, 2006
8

87stang306

New Member
Nov 20, 2005
8
0
0
Jan 19, 2006
#1
  • Jan 19, 2006
  • #1
i have a 306 with vitor jr intake, 650 speed demon carb,afr185 heads,1.6 roller rockers,comp cam XE274. i was wondering on how much horsepower and torque difference a 347 with this same setup would make. i am gonna bolt this setup on and am just wondering how much the horsepower and torque numbers would change. thanks
 
3

304billet

Member
Sep 16, 2005
315
0
16
Jan 19, 2006
#2
  • Jan 19, 2006
  • #2
about 50rwhp and 50rwtq.
 

QDRHRSE

New Member
Dec 31, 2002
1,590
0
0
Palmdale, CA
Jan 19, 2006
#3
  • Jan 19, 2006
  • #3
Inches always help. I't hard to say how much though unless you have your own dyno...or experience.
 

88Stangboy

Banned
Dec 12, 2005
342
0
0
Greenville, SC
Jan 19, 2006
#4
  • Jan 19, 2006
  • #4
ditto....50hp, 50trq.....not enough to justify the money and work in my opinion. If i were you, id start from scratch and build 393 or 408. You'd definitly be pleased. That should be plenty enough room to grow into just about anything you want to do.
 
3

304billet

Member
Sep 16, 2005
315
0
16
Jan 20, 2006
#5
  • Jan 20, 2006
  • #5
The only reason u s/b considering doing a 347 was if ur 306 needed refreshed. There r plenty of ways to make their power and beyond. Go nitrous 150 shot.
 

mytight95

Active Member
Apr 11, 2003
2,605
0
46
Dothan,Al
Jan 20, 2006
#6
  • Jan 20, 2006
  • #6
sorry to intrude in the thread, but say price versus power which one is more economic, a budget 347 or a 306.... which one would last longer?



subscribing btw


jason
 

90mustangGT

I felt sorry for girls because
Founding Member
Jan 15, 2002
2,773
17
89
Dallas, GA
Jan 21, 2006
#7
  • Jan 21, 2006
  • #7
It depends. Is the 347 going to have the same compression and such? Saying everything else is the same, the only difference is the cubes, I would say you'll pick up some horse, and especailly a much wider, stronger torque curve. AFR 185's and a Victor Jr. intake is kind of big on a 306 unless your running some RPM. If you need a new motor, the 347 is definatly the best bet, but if your just trying to get some more power, there are other ways.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Engine Suggestions on an engine rebuild. Stock cam/GT40Ps or aftermarket on both for a fun weekend driver?
  • MadSquirrelTech
  • Apr 28, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
592
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 7, 2026
MadSquirrelTech
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
670
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 28, 2026
Noobz347
G
Drivetrain trickflow Stage 3 camshaft 347 stroker. also too much gear????
  • Gross Virgin
  • May 2, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
0
Views
770
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 2, 2024
Gross Virgin
G
C
Help, engine breaking up at 6k rpm
  • clayton seiders
  • Mar 10, 2024
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
3
Views
814
The Welcome Wagon Mar 11, 2024
AeroCoupe
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?