• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

306?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 94indy
  • Start date Start date May 31, 2005

94indy

New Member
Feb 23, 2004
33
0
0
hattiesburg
May 31, 2005
#1
  • May 31, 2005
  • #1
I am looking into getting a shortblock for my car. I was thinking about a 306, but will a 308 or 310 be better. I am looking for street/strip setup, will a 308 or 310 be bad for a daily driver. Just looking at my options.
 

Aliate X

Member
May 9, 2005
602
1
18
Rockland NY
May 31, 2005
#2
  • May 31, 2005
  • #2
Honestly the cubic inches really dont have much of an effect on drivablity, its just the fact that with boreing the 302 block out more and more, 308 and up, youll have thinner cylinder walls, which would be bad if you run some type of FI. Also some people say engine bay temp's go up with thinner cylinder walls.
 

super302

I'd do anything for free Bapples
May 29, 2004
2,878
1
0
Davenport, IA
May 31, 2005
#3
  • May 31, 2005
  • #3
alot of people say not to bore more than .030 over (306 cubes) b/c the walls get too thin
 

94indy

New Member
Feb 23, 2004
33
0
0
hattiesburg
Jun 1, 2005
#4
  • Jun 1, 2005
  • #4
Thanks for the info, I've been thinking of going with 306, I know for a fact I going to put new heads on the motor (302) even if I dont go with 306. Right now I have stock gt-40 with 1.72 rockers. I am going with trickflow tw, should I go with 1.7 or 1.6 rockers. Current cam is steeda 19, .516 lift with 1.72 rockers...
 
T

TheUser

Active Member
Jul 25, 2003
1,859
1
36
Springfield, MO
Jun 1, 2005
#5
  • Jun 1, 2005
  • #5
If you can get a 302, get a 302. The reason for having a 306, 308 really is because it's a rebuilt motor and the cyclinders were bored out to get "new" cyclinder walls. A 306 isn't necessarily a bad thing, but you won't pick up much more hp from 4 cubes and - as stated - your cyclinder walls are thinner.
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
34
129
Jun 1, 2005
#6
  • Jun 1, 2005
  • #6
Huh?

It sounds like you would want a 351 based power plant or a 302-based stroker. As everyone said, the slight displacement increase is a necessary means to rebuild (most of the time - some can hone cylinders and be alright).

good luck.
 

z9_87

New Member
Apr 16, 2004
332
0
0
Urbana, IL
Jun 1, 2005
#7
  • Jun 1, 2005
  • #7
94indy said:
Thanks for the info, I've been thinking of going with 306, I know for a fact I going to put new heads on the motor (302) even if I dont go with 306. Right now I have stock gt-40 with 1.72 rockers. I am going with trickflow tw, should I go with 1.7 or 1.6 rockers. Current cam is steeda 19, .516 lift with 1.72 rockers...
Click to expand...
Don't know what kind of budget you have but the gt-40's aren't bad heads and why replace the 1.72's w/ 1.7's? That's going backwards. I'm assuming you have a cobra if the stock heads are gt40?
 

94indy

New Member
Feb 23, 2004
33
0
0
hattiesburg
Jun 1, 2005
#8
  • Jun 1, 2005
  • #8
yeah, I have a cobra. Reason for the change in rockers is because I am going to trickflow heads which ,as you probably know, are stub mounted instead of ped. I was talking to a guy and he suggested going to a 1.6 instead of using 1.7. I was just curious what other people thought. I like getting as much info as I can before doing diff. stuff. I know the 1.6 will lower my lift, but he said it would be good to go the 1.6 in case I ever wanted to go with a little bigger cam. Right now I have a steeda 19, which I like cause of the 94-95 computer. Plus I dont think there will be much of a power diff. in the 1.6 vs 1.7 that I could tell since I will be running a better head anyway. But I am always up for good advice.
 

94indy

New Member
Feb 23, 2004
33
0
0
hattiesburg
Jun 1, 2005
#9
  • Jun 1, 2005
  • #9
HISSIN50 said:
Huh?

It sounds like you would want a 351 based power plant or a 302-based stroker. As everyone said, the slight displacement increase is a necessary means to rebuild (most of the time - some can hone cylinders and be alright).

good luck.
Click to expand...


I would like to get I 351 shortblock, but still trying to figure out what I could use from my motor and what I'd have to get. I know lower intake would have to be replaced, but what else? As far as budget goes, 3000-3500.
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
34
129
Jun 1, 2005
#10
  • Jun 1, 2005
  • #10
Sounds good bud. You kinda lost me on your original post, so apologies if I came across rude in my first post.

I have not done the swap myself, but here is some info that might help with it. A 331 or 347 is pretty mean too. Then there is the 460.

Good luck with deciding upon which route to go.
 

94indy

New Member
Feb 23, 2004
33
0
0
hattiesburg
Jun 1, 2005
#11
  • Jun 1, 2005
  • #11
No problem, I confused myself
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

3.08 gears with a manual trans
  • limp
  • Aug 27, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
27
Views
374
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Yesterday at 9:50 PM
KRUISR
B
Electrical Why does my fox body keep frying eecs
  • brandyn200
  • Jun 20, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
333
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jun 25, 2026
AeroCoupe
Electrical problem plug in the drivers kick panel
  • Mindseye007
  • Aug 16, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
149
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Aug 16, 2026
Mindseye007
Cooling Jacket Pitting Idea's?
  • BoostedRed89gt
  • Aug 9, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
12
Views
176
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 17, 2026
Mustang5L5
J
Wheels-Tires Need Some Help - Brakes Upgrade/Wheel fitment
  • jaygee15
  • Dec 8, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 3 4 5
Replies
81
Views
3K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 6, 2026
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?