315s on 94-98s.

EPIKGT said:

Thanks...The only traction mod on the car are the LCA's? I installed them because the factory LCA's are crap plus I had to remove the quads to fit the wheels. They will benefit me later when I mod my motor. I wont buy the sumi's again, & the only reason I am running them is because they came with my wheel package....

Click to expand...

The controls arms, shocks, and aftermarket springs. I count 3. "A one, a two, a threeeeee" lol.

You are supposed to remove the quads after adding control arms. I bought sumi's with my new rims. My fault though. I sold them a month later and bought the MT's.

I ran a 11.37 on a completely stock suspension and the 17" MT's. With the exact same set up my best was a 12.4x with the sumi's lol

I would like to stick 335's out back.

jivepepper said:

The controls arms, shocks, and aftermarket springs. I count 3. "A one, a two, a threeeeee" lol.

You are supposed to remove the quads after adding control arms. I bought sumi's with my new rims. My fault though. I sold them a month later and bought the MT's.

Click to expand...

I guess... LOL!! The car is my DD so i don t really need DR's yet, until I turn up the wick later this year...

I have the bilsteins on the car not for traction, but because I dont like t do 1/2 a$$ lowering on my cars, plus the stockers were pretty tired when I bought the car. I got the control arms because I wanted 17X10.5's & didnt want wheelhop when i removed the quads...Its all a domino effect, next thing u know u have a full MM built suspension...


At this point my 95 is so slow, it would be lucky to run a 14.9, so sumis work just fine for a DD street car...The Mach needs DR's though

if you count springs and shocks as traction mods they should be classified as anti-traction mods. Only pro-traction mod he has is LCA's, since when does lowering a car help with rearward traction from a dig?

jivepepper said:

Click to expand...

do you have any pics of that blue riced out stang in the back ??