• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

331 Stoker kit ?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ray@VSK
  • Start date Start date Apr 1, 2005
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
R

Ray@VSK

New Member
Aug 27, 2004
355
0
0
Apr 2, 2005
#21
  • Apr 2, 2005
  • #21
I was talking about compression, stock is 9:01 with 64cc heads right ?
 
S

speed1972

Founding Member
Mar 13, 2002
891
0
16
Denver, CO - Buckley AFB
Apr 2, 2005
#22
  • Apr 2, 2005
  • #22
lower compression with no change in boost equals less power. I don't know how much but you have to crank the boost up to get back to the same power you had with the stock compression. Ray, this is more of a question for the power adder forum....
 

TT91

Active Member
May 23, 2003
1,536
0
36
Paramus, NJ
Apr 2, 2005
#23
  • Apr 2, 2005
  • #23
Got the description from google"1.5 kenne bell 5.0" .........Allfords.com had it
 
D

Daggar

New Member
Jul 19, 2004
3,902
5
0
Apr 2, 2005
#24
  • Apr 2, 2005
  • #24
poneypower89 said:
Nope, I seen it (the 1.5l kb) in his sig.... I figured he would just be re-using it. The only reason I brought my original post up was because I've seen a lot of guys sell their 1.5l after moving to a 347 stroker and realizing the blower was too little to be efficient.

EDIT: Also wanted to know... Where did you get that description from???
Click to expand...

Yep... this is correct. Let's not forget that we're talking about a POSITIVE DISPLACEMENT supercharger here. With twinscrews, boost level is a side effect of the back pressure of the air volume that it's trying to force into the motor. On a good functioning, good flowing, 331, that 1.5L blower is not going to be able to provide the air volume necesssary to give you the boost levels that you've got in mind. The 1.5L starts falling off at around 5500 to 6000 RPM pushing roughly 8 lbs through a stock 302. It wil not be able to provide that same boost to a larger motor and becomes very ineficient when you try spinning it faster. You're going to need a larger displacement supercharger to feed a stroker.

The description that Sureshot found explains it pretty well. When the motor becomes effecient enough, it's going to be trying to suck air through that blower while it waits for it to provide the air that it's looking for. Of course, that's not going to happen since the motor will still be spinning up ahead of the supercharger (this is over simplified but you should get my meaning).
 
R

Ray@VSK

New Member
Aug 27, 2004
355
0
0
Apr 2, 2005
#25
  • Apr 2, 2005
  • #25
So a stroker will breath better than a normal 302 then ? I found 3 stroker kits to choose from, compression ratios are as follows: Keith Black 9:5, Probe 8:4 & Mahle 8:7 couldn't find anything any closer to stock so I guess I would be best to go with the Mahle kit with a 8:7 compression ratio right or should I not go to a stroker @ all ?
 
D

Daggar

New Member
Jul 19, 2004
3,902
5
0
Apr 2, 2005
#26
  • Apr 2, 2005
  • #26
If you intend to use the KB that you've already got, I'd suggest doing a 306 with forged rods and pistons and finding a cam and heads that will make the most out that blower.
 
8

87'GTstang

New Member
Feb 16, 2004
1,025
0
0
Apr 2, 2005
#27
  • Apr 2, 2005
  • #27
For one, the 1.5 is too small of a blower for an animal of a stroker with it on there, the blowzilla or flowzilla is what one really needs.

As for compression, it is all a matter of blueprinting and choosing carefully. Basically, the lower the compression, the lower the power output without boost. BUT, since the compression ratio is lower, more boost is able to be had. the tradeoff is yes you lose a few ponies when you lower compression, but boost has a larger impact on power output than compression - so it definitely can overcome it.

The magic question that is and has always been to power adder junkies is "how much boost can I run on pump gas?" It is just that, more compression + more boost = more likely for detonation. You can only run but so much compression with so much boost before the detonation demon haunts.

As for the KB kits, the old 5.0's do not have an integrated cooler, but methanol/water injection kits have had a lot of success with the KB mainly due to the fact that the injection takes place before the unit and then passes through it whereas a centrifugal does not have that luxury. These kits, like the snow kits, have had such success that it has been reported that it works even better than traditional aftercooler/intercooler kits due to the injection method and natural octane-inhibiting factor (methanol octane can run in the 120 range in pure form).

A stroker is like any bigger cubic inch engine, it needs more fuel and definitely more air - the more you feed it, the more of an animal it becomes. When you limit it's potential by using undersized parts - obviously you limit power output.
 

stock 92 gt

New Member
Mar 30, 2005
165
0
0
Apr 2, 2005
#28
  • Apr 2, 2005
  • #28
daggar i plan to run v2 sq s-trim....what do you suggest? 302,306,or a 331. what i mean is which one would be the best application.
 
8

87'GTstang

New Member
Feb 16, 2004
1,025
0
0
Apr 2, 2005
#29
  • Apr 2, 2005
  • #29
Daggar said:
If you intend to use the KB that you've already got, I'd suggest doing a 306 with forged rods and pistons and finding a cam and heads that will make the most out that blower.
Click to expand...
Ditto - the 1.5L is undersized for that kind of work.
 
R

Ray@VSK

New Member
Aug 27, 2004
355
0
0
Apr 2, 2005
#30
  • Apr 2, 2005
  • #30
Hmm, so your telling me a 331 stroker with my heads, cam & blower will not give me anymore power but will hurt me more than do good ?

What about if I use a 342 stroker reusing stock pistons, will that maintain my stock compression ratios or be worse because it's a 342 ?
 
D

Daggar

New Member
Jul 19, 2004
3,902
5
0
Apr 2, 2005
#31
  • Apr 2, 2005
  • #31
stock 92 gt said:
daggar i plan to run v2 sq s-trim....what do you suggest? 302,306,or a 331. what i mean is which one would be the best application.
Click to expand...

Don't get me lying. I have some idea of what I'd run with that blower but don't have any practical experience with them. I'll leave your question for someone who knows those blowers much better than I.

I will say however, that given the boost pressures available for the V2 S-Trim that it should run like a raped ape in addition to a 331. Someone who knows those blowers well can confirm or deny that.
 
D

Daggar

New Member
Jul 19, 2004
3,902
5
0
Apr 2, 2005
#32
  • Apr 2, 2005
  • #32
Ray@VSK said:
Hmm, so your telling me a 331 stroker with my heads, cam & blower will not give me anymore power but will hurt me more than do good ?

What about if I use a 342 stroker reusing stock pistons, will that maintain my stock compression ratios or be worse because it's a 342 ?
Click to expand...


I don't consider stroking your motor and using the 1.5L KB blower a viable option. You're going to need a larger displacement blower to feed a larger displacement motor.
 

stock 92 gt

New Member
Mar 30, 2005
165
0
0
Apr 2, 2005
#33
  • Apr 2, 2005
  • #33
Daggar said:
Don't get me lying. I have some idea of what I'd run with that blower but don't have any practical experience with them. I'll leave your question for someone who knows those blowers much better than I.

I will say however, that given the boost pressures available for the V2 S-Trim that it should run like a raped ape in addition to a 331. Someone who knows those blowers well can confirm or deny that.
Click to expand...
ok thanks for narrowing it down some and being honest in telling me you dont know all the facts.
 

Rick 91GT

Mustang Master
Nov 29, 1999
9,692
95
99
PA
Apr 2, 2005
#34
  • Apr 2, 2005
  • #34
Ray most 342 use a 5.4" rod or a 5.315" rod, stock is a 5.09" rod so a stock piston will not work. The CH on a 342/347 stroker piston is usually 1.09 or 1.17, stock is like a 1.6.

The larger blower will be needed to make the power with the increased cubes. A 331, with a good flowing head and intake, custom cam and a S trim (10psi) can make over 500RWHP and still be very, very streetable.

Ray what kind of kit are you looking for? Cast, forged? What cc are your heads?
 
R

Ray@VSK

New Member
Aug 27, 2004
355
0
0
Apr 3, 2005
#35
  • Apr 3, 2005
  • #35
Well I'm seeing 10 pounds now & that's with only a 8lb pulley & I can still bump it up another few pounds aswell without exceeding the rpm of the blower, 10 pounds is actually what I was planning on running so ?

I was looking @ 3 different 331 kits all of wich have forged rods & nodular iron crankshaft, the Y303 heads I currently have & plan on using have a 64cc chamber.

If you think a 331 is the wrong way to go could you please suggest something else I can do to gain some power than because cam did not help?
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

3
393W Stroker with Boost - Need Spark Plug Recommendations
  • 387lx
  • Apr 29, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
262
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 30, 2026
HotFox
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 95 GT/Saleen Supercharged 331 install
  • from6to8
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
801
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
Engine Suggestions on an engine rebuild. Stock cam/GT40Ps or aftermarket on both for a fun weekend driver?
  • MadSquirrelTech
  • Apr 28, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
704
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 7, 2026
MadSquirrelTech
  • Locked
Engine Might have to get a Dart block but don't want to and if I do, then 363 instead of 331. Thoughts on what I've already bought so far.......
  • from6to8
  • Jul 8, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
484
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 8, 2025
Noobz347
Motor given to me and I’d like to rebuild it what do I need to do
  • Creomod
  • Dec 14, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
6
Views
358
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 16, 2024
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?