• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

331 STROKER COMPRESSION INPUT NEEDED

  • Thread starter Thread starter d_gtracer
  • Start date Start date Oct 22, 2006
D

d_gtracer

New Member
Oct 25, 2005
7
0
0
Fla
Oct 22, 2006
#1
  • Oct 22, 2006
  • #1
I am having my 87 GT 331 stroker motor being built by S&B RACING ENGINES out of florida, and have heard different opinions on compression and cylinder head intake runner size. I know everyone has an opinion so please if you can give recommendation based on your knowlegde and not what you hear is appreciated. GUTS of motor are forged rods, forged crank, ross pistons, It was recommended to stay around 10:1 compression with a 185, 195CC intake runner AFR HEAD(possibly Dart) ,Motor will see occasional nitrous(is lower compression better? and why such a big intake runner head? to get the flow an AFR 185 puts out? builder stated motor will be 10 1/2 :1 and wants to use 210CC intake runner aluminum cylinder head, output between 420-450HP. Is bigger better??
 
W

woodsy

Banned
Oct 17, 2006
35
0
0
Oct 22, 2006
#2
  • Oct 22, 2006
  • #2
Nitrous loves compression, the more the better. For a pump gas ride leave it between 10-11:1, as for the cylinder head runnner size. I am very curious as to what 210cc runner head they want to use! 185-195-205 is not too big either. It's all in the cam.
 

retro50

New Member
Jul 15, 2003
191
0
0
Plymouth,MA
Oct 22, 2006
#3
  • Oct 22, 2006
  • #3
If nitrous is in the plans run the 210 c.c. heads he (The builder) wants to use or some A.F.R. 205's. Run the compression in the mid to high 10's And keep the quench in check. Nitrous doesn't really care what the compression ratio is. This will make a nice street/strip combo. And 420-450 at the flywheel is not out of the question.
 
3

304billet

Member
Sep 16, 2005
315
0
16
Oct 23, 2006
#4
  • Oct 23, 2006
  • #4
I agree with the above 10.5 to 11:1 CR and a 205cc head. I would do either a AFR 205 or TFS Track heat 205 head. I think ur builder is thinking of a Victor Jr. head with 210cc. AFR makes a 205cc head with a nitrous exhaust port. Part # 1452.

I would also do a custom cam designed around the head and intake cfm flow among other things. Cam Motion, FTI or Jay Allen.

I would also suggest if ur running EFI a Holley systemax ll intake or TFS-R intake port matched.

u s/b hitting 375-400 @ the RW, before the nitrous. Remember, that stock 302 roller block is good to 450-500rwhp. with a 75-100 shot u will be at it's max.

u may want to consider finding a mexican 302 roller or buying a dart sportmen block good to 1200hp for around $1700.
 
D

d_gtracer

New Member
Oct 25, 2005
7
0
0
Fla
Oct 23, 2006
#5
  • Oct 23, 2006
  • #5
Thank you for your input, the builder is looking to use PBM performance aluminum cylinder heads the name I believe was Strike Force. the heads can be found at www.pbmperformance.com. but when I called the company the cannot give me any flow numbers. The cam I will be using is a Comp 236 XFI 236/248 .579/.579 . I can check flow numbers for AFR, DART, WINDSOR. But do I really want to spend $1200 on a set of cylinder heads with no flow numbers when putting together a solid bottom end? the answer I got was the heads would flow in the 250 range, but at what lift is the key isnt it? on both the intake and exhaust . The AFR 205 has a 180CC intake runner, should I be looking for good flow or just a high intake runner size ? FLOW CORRECT?
 
D

d_gtracer

New Member
Oct 25, 2005
7
0
0
Fla
Oct 23, 2006
#6
  • Oct 23, 2006
  • #6
The car is running 24lb injectors, trick flow street heat intake ( Not the track one) , full msd, car is pretty much set up for street/strip. I just dont want to be concerned with detonation at 10 1/2 :1 like I have heard is very likely. Will detonation be an issue at 10 1/2 :1 whether I spray the car or not. It is my weekend driver, not a flat out drag car.
 

bullitstang1313

Member
Jan 21, 2003
713
0
16
Indianapolis / Columbus, Indiana
Oct 24, 2006
#7
  • Oct 24, 2006
  • #7
Pump gas will not stand up to 10:1 or 11:1 compression without knock. Most vehicles built today use a 8.5:1 or 9:1 compression ratio. The higher the compression the higher the octane you will need. Forced induction needs lower compression since you are effectively increasing compression by increasing the amount of air in the cylinder. Nitrous doesn't require either. If you go with a higher compression it is the same as NA except for the fact that nitrous will increase the power output. Higher compression will give you more power all around, but you will need the proper safety aspects in order to avoid detonation. This can be done by retarding the timing during use of nitrous.
 
W

woodsy

Banned
Oct 17, 2006
35
0
0
Oct 24, 2006
#8
  • Oct 24, 2006
  • #8
bullitstang1313 said:
Pump gas will not stand up to 10:1 or 11:1 compression without knock.
Click to expand...
craziest thing I have read thus far today on this forum. It's so blatantly false its not funny.
 

bullitstang1313

Member
Jan 21, 2003
713
0
16
Indianapolis / Columbus, Indiana
Oct 24, 2006
#9
  • Oct 24, 2006
  • #9
By pump gas, i'm talking about 87 to 93 octane. If you stick with stock timing of 12 degrees or the typical advanced timing of 14-18 and are running 10:1 or 11:1 compression on a fuel injected engine you will experience knock. You can use 10:1 or 11:1 compression with 93 octane and retarded timing and not experience knock, but knock will be common with this high of compression. If this wasn't the case automotive engines would be built with this high of compression in order to be more efficient and with more power.
 
W

woodsy

Banned
Oct 17, 2006
35
0
0
Oct 24, 2006
#10
  • Oct 24, 2006
  • #10
bullitstang1313 said:
By pump gas, i'm talking about 87 to 93 octane. If you stick with stock timing of 12 degrees or the typical advanced timing of 14-18 and are running 10:1 or 11:1 compression on a fuel injected engine you will experience knock. You can use 10:1 or 11:1 compression with 93 octane and retarded timing and not experience knock, but knock will be common with this high of compression. If this wasn't the case automotive engines would be built with this high of compression in order to be more efficient and with more power.
Click to expand...
I dont know how my 557 inch, 377 inch cleveland and 418 inch motors are running on 93 then. That damn toyota prius running 13:1 from the factory is a miracle. You can run 10-11:1 all day long on pump gas. There are beyond countless amounts of mustangs running 10-11:1 on pump gas, injected with 12-16 degrees initial timing.
 

BlownFiveLiter

have car, will race....wait, it doesn't run
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
3,133
18
108
Chicagoland
Oct 24, 2006
#11
  • Oct 24, 2006
  • #11
Stock timing is 10° BTC, and yes, you can run 10:1ish compression on pump gas. Many cars come from the factory with compression that high, and the key to fighting off detonation is in the tune.
 

bullitstang1313

Member
Jan 21, 2003
713
0
16
Indianapolis / Columbus, Indiana
Oct 24, 2006
#12
  • Oct 24, 2006
  • #12
I dont know how my 557 inch, 377 inch cleveland and 418 inch motors are running on 93 then. That damn toyota prius running 13:1 from the factory is a miracle. You can run 10-11:1 all day long on pump gas. There are beyond countless amounts of mustangs running 10-11:1 on pump gas, injected with 12-16 degrees initial timing.
Click to expand...
Many cars come from the factory with compression that high, and the key to fighting off detonation is in the tune.
Click to expand...

I'm not trying to say that it is impossible, what I am saying is that it has to do with the technology used. Carbed vehicles don't have to worry as much because they are not typically designed for stoich air fuel ratio and the extra fuel will help prevent detonation. Toyota uses advanced technology and controls as well as redesigned combustion chambers in order to reach their targets of higher C.R. which helps emissions reduction. What i'm trying to say is that an inexperienced car owner, who doesn't have a clear idea of the desired engine and who doesn't have tuning experience should play it safer than those with more experience and knowledge. I'm not trying to insult d_gtracer or you either woodsy, I'm just expressing that d_gtracer should get a clear view of the requirements and the consequences of any decision decided. I didn't mean to come off as arrogant and ignorant.
 

mstngjoe

Founding Member
Jul 26, 2002
428
0
0
Oregon
Oct 24, 2006
#13
  • Oct 24, 2006
  • #13
d_gtracer said:
....the builder is looking to use PBM performance aluminum cylinder heads the name I believe was Strike Force.......but when I called the company the cannot give me any flow numbers........The AFR 205 has a 180CC intake runner........
Click to expand...

Those heads are all over ebay.....most likely chinese knockoffs similar to Victor Jr heads.

"Can't" or won't give flow numbers??? Probably not too proud of them.

The AFR 205 head has a 205cc intake runner.....
 

EDC

Founding Member
Apr 25, 2001
342
63
58
In the new shop... 24/7
Oct 24, 2006
#14
  • Oct 24, 2006
  • #14
mstngjoe said:
Those heads are all over ebay.....most likely chinese knockoffs similar to Victor Jr heads.

"Can't" or won't give flow numbers??? Probably not too proud of them.

The AFR 205 head has a 205cc intake runner.....
Click to expand...

The heads "are" definitely the Chinese Edelbrock knock-offs. I know what PBM and other WDs like them sells.

Visit that "other" web site for an 11 page diatribe on how much work it takes to get them "decent"...

Save money and get AFR 205 heads right off the bat. They cost more in the beginning but in the end, a lot less money and aggrevation!

Ed
 
3

304billet

Member
Sep 16, 2005
315
0
16
Oct 24, 2006
#15
  • Oct 24, 2006
  • #15
Listen to Ed. Get the AFR 205's or new TFS Track Heat 205 cnc'd head. Those new track heat's flow 300/220 @ .500 lift. Also don't use an off the shelf cam, go custom.

ur CR of 10.5:1 on the street with pump gas is fine. with a good tune u won't ever see detonation.
 
D

d_gtracer

New Member
Oct 25, 2005
7
0
0
Fla
Nov 18, 2006
#16
  • Nov 18, 2006
  • #16
Thank you for taking the time to help me with the concerns I had, I understand everyone has different opinions. Engine builder and I have made the decision. Motor will be 10:1 compression, most likely the AFR heads, oh and 1968 302 mexican block is on its way! Thanks to all that replied
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
  • Locked
Engine Might have to get a Dart block but don't want to and if I do, then 363 instead of 331. Thoughts on what I've already bought so far.......
  • from6to8
  • Jul 8, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
406
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 8, 2025
Noobz347
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
639
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 28, 2026
Noobz347
Engine 1990 LX 5.0L EFI Mustang Fuel Management Problems - HELP!
  • 5.0LXStanger
  • May 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
45
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 11, 2025
5.0LXStanger
Might have to get a Dart block but don't want to and if I do, then 363 instead of 331. Thoughts on what I've already bought so far.......
  • from6to8
  • Jul 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
52
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 9, 2025
from6to8
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?