• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

351 w heads on a 302?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 91foxbod50
  • Start date Start date Jan 16, 2008
9

91foxbod50

Member
Sep 26, 2007
486
0
16
Jan 16, 2008
#1
  • Jan 16, 2008
  • #1
I have a set of 351 w heads that look like they can bolt up to my 302 block, i also have a friend w/ a gt40 intake... could this combo work out for me? need advice im planning on doing this soon
 
M

macx

New Member
Jul 18, 2004
228
0
0
SE Missouri near Cape Girardeau
Jan 17, 2008
#2
  • Jan 17, 2008
  • #2
They bolt on, except you'd need the 351 1/2" head bolts to the smaller
302 head bolts, pretty commonly available reasonable.

But do a little research on those 351 heads, they may not even be as
good as your 302 HO heads, depending on what you have on there.

GT40 is a super intake for a moderate street motor - way more low/mid range
torque than any aftermarket intake.

check this out www.tmossporting.com

also http://www.musclemustangfastfords.com/tech/173_0101_super/index1.html
 

BlownFiveLiter

have car, will race....wait, it doesn't run
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
3,133
18
108
Chicagoland
Jan 17, 2008
#3
  • Jan 17, 2008
  • #3
Agreed on the heads. They could be just as bad or worse than what you already have. Ford put the E7TE heads on the 351 some vans, trucks, etc.
 
9

91foxbod50

Member
Sep 26, 2007
486
0
16
Jan 17, 2008
#4
  • Jan 17, 2008
  • #4
Their old heads off a 69 torino block, They look good, nothing wrong with them as far as i can see.. maybe i should put new valve springs in ?
 

429Mustang429

New Member
May 26, 2006
14
0
0
Illinois
Jan 17, 2008
#5
  • Jan 17, 2008
  • #5
Im in the process of building a 351w...The heads you have should have larger intake ports and breathe a little better than the stock 5.0 heads. The down fall is that the bolt holes on the 351w heads are 1/2 and the 302 are 7/16. it can be done, but be careful.

Also, according to one of my books, the intake port is .25" wider, so you should pull more air. The compression chamber is about the same, so no loss in compression ratio should take place.

Good luck...let us know how it goes

~Darren
 

PUNISHER RACING

Active Member
Aug 27, 2007
1,124
0
36
FORD CITY, PA.
Jan 17, 2008
#6
  • Jan 17, 2008
  • #6
They make stepped washers to bush those holes down to 302 bolt size. You might also want to check those seats out measure pushrod also. I think those are the old rail rocker heads they may need a longer pushrod?
 

ttop88

Member
Mar 12, 2007
42
0
6
indiana
Jan 17, 2008
#7
  • Jan 17, 2008
  • #7
A set of e7 heads with a home port job will flow as much or more and make more power under the curve. If you could find gt-40 or gt-40p heads you would be way ahead of the curve here. The technology today is a bit better than it was 39 years ago.
 
9

91foxbod50

Member
Sep 26, 2007
486
0
16
Jan 18, 2008
#8
  • Jan 18, 2008
  • #8
odd thing i noticed today, one of the valves looked as if they were pushed in further then the others... is this normal? all of the other valves looked fine but one was pushed in
 

Hissing Cobra

Founding Member
Jan 4, 2002
798
0
17
Massachusetts
Jan 19, 2008
#9
  • Jan 19, 2008
  • #9
Check to see if the 351W heads are from the '69-'70 model years. If they're not, don't use them. Those two years had the best heads and if you had a ported/polished set, you could achieve 300 rwhp. All of the 351W heads in the '71-up family were smog versions and in the '80's, Ford began using the 302 heads on those motors.
 
9

91foxbod50

Member
Sep 26, 2007
486
0
16
Jan 19, 2008
#10
  • Jan 19, 2008
  • #10
The heads are deffinetly 69 351w heads.. But like i was saying, im not sure if i should use them because the #1 cylinder valve is pushed INTO the head and is not flush or lipped like the rest
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

9
Milton Questions, 351 swap newedge
  • 996stang
  • Jul 20, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
217
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 25, 2026
Killer351w
K
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
R
New heads
  • Robman8028
  • Jul 30, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
6
Views
768
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 31, 2025
gkomo
T
Oil burning on my recently buil 302
  • The blk67
  • May 15, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
149
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 15, 2026
Noobz347
Y
Speed density 302 to carb 351W
  • yaboity
  • May 29, 2026
  • Fox Engine Swaparoo
Replies
1
Views
88
Fox Engine Swaparoo May 29, 2026
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?