• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

351C FelPro Intake Galley Pan gasket not fitting

  • Thread starter Thread starter ScottAlvar
  • Start date Start date Nov 24, 2012
S

ScottAlvar

New Member
Nov 24, 2012
2
0
1
Nov 24, 2012
#1
  • Nov 24, 2012
  • #1
Hello,
I purchased a Fel-Pro intake manifold gasket set for my 1971 Ford 351C 2V engine from autozone.

On the box, it says part #:MS 96010
and indicates that it fits my motor.

However, the galley pan doesn't fit because the sides which mate up to the heads are not at the correct angle. Does that make sense? I feel like if I were to squeeze the sides together and fold them up, they would fit.

The dimensions all seem to be correct... meaning it looks and feels like the old turkey pan I removed, except for the mating surfaces are at the wrong angle.

Did I get the wrong pan? a defective pan? or is it something else... ??

thanks.
 

Hack

15 Year Member
Mar 23, 2004
1,945
13
69
Minneapolis
Nov 24, 2012
#2
  • Nov 24, 2012
  • #2
Nothing seems wrong from your description. The pans do have a slightly different angle shape than the engine parts. They have to be pushed onto the dowels in the heads. I noticed that the same was true of the metal intake pan on my 400 when I replaced that.

Some people like to modify the pans rather than installing them as-is. Sometimes the intake areas are a little difficult to make seal, so some people eliminate them. After reading what other people have done I cut the intake port portion of the pan off and then drilled a hole in the lowest area of the pan so any oil that gets in there can drain. Then I just used one set of paper gaskets on the intake. On the valley pan rails I mocked everything up first to determine how much thickness I needed, and put down beads of silicone under and over the metal pan. I let the silicone set up for a while before dropping the intake on.

I tried to post a photo but it didn't work for me. Here's a photobucket link:
http://s1204.beta.photobucket.com/u...rt=3&o=0&_suid=135377643551406248929750902676
 
S

ScottAlvar

New Member
Nov 24, 2012
2
0
1
Nov 24, 2012
#3
  • Nov 24, 2012
  • #3
Hack said:
Nothing seems wrong from your description. The pans do have a slightly different angle shape than the engine parts. They have to be pushed onto the dowels in the heads. I noticed that the same was true of the metal intake pan on my 400 when I replaced that.
Click to expand...

Thanks for the picture. I've seen people talk about cutting the pan off. I'd like to go w/ the full pan though, but I'm afraid to bend it... it's ALOT of bending needed and I'm not sure I'm willing to twist it or something accidentally just to find out it never seals properly.

I checked my local autoparts and they don't have one in stock. That would have been the easiest, just compare mine to another in case its defective or something. Worst part is, w/ all the discussion of using the pan or not I've never seen anyone talk about having to bend it to fit.
 

Hack

15 Year Member
Mar 23, 2004
1,945
13
69
Minneapolis
Nov 24, 2012
#4
  • Nov 24, 2012
  • #4
Yeah bending a lot sounds wrong to me. What I've seen on the metal pans I've had is the bends are short, so it's a little flatter than it should be. On my 400 I just pushed it into place onto the dowels that fit into the heads and those dowels kept it in position while I put the silicone around all the ports and on the valley end rails. On the 400 it seemed to seal up fine and work ok.
 

crane550

Member
Sep 17, 2007
122
3
19
Nov 25, 2012
#5
  • Nov 25, 2012
  • #5
Can you show us some pics of what you mean? I just installed that gasket in two motors- one a 2v and another on a 4v. Didn't seem too hard. Show us what your dealing with and maybe we can get a better picture.
 

horse sence

15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
12,281
8,136
233
Wile Coyote's stunt double
Nov 25, 2012
#6
  • Nov 25, 2012
  • #6
the metal gasket may need a little bending ,i have had to do it my self.once it is pushed on the dowl pins it should stay in place.how ever dont let the silicone set up
or you will have a leak, it needs to be wet when parts are installed for a proper seal to both surfaces
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Engine New lower intake manifold mating surface question
  • 91GTstroked
  • Nov 27, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
17
Views
841
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 7, 2024
91GTstroked
Do i really need the metal oil pan gasket?
  • mattbaker302
  • Dec 25, 2019
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
840
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Dec 26, 2019
rbohm
Vacuum fittings on upper intake
  • DemonGT
  • Oct 8, 2020
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
0
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Oct 8, 2020
DemonGT
E
For Sale 1989 LX Notch 410ci 85mm turbo 8 pt cage 9" rear end
  • EightyNineFive
  • Aug 22, 2021
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
1
Views
4K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Jun 18, 2022
Freakinstang
F
On3 Performance Install Tips
  • flstang65
  • Dec 15, 2019
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
12K
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Mar 17, 2023
atomicfox236
A
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?