• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

351W block, Roller cam

  • Thread starter Thread starter js66coupe
  • Start date Start date Jan 1, 2011
J

js66coupe

Member
May 10, 2009
49
0
7
Florida
Jan 1, 2011
#1
  • Jan 1, 2011
  • #1
What does it take to convert a standard (flat tappet) 351W block to use an HR cam? Is there any machine work involved? Or just parts? TIA
 
J

j69302

Active Member
Jan 31, 2006
325
1
29
Jan 1, 2011
#2
  • Jan 1, 2011
  • #2
You need roller conversion lifters with the link bar or drill and tap some holes in the valley for the retainer plate.

You might need shorter push rods.
 

69gmachine

Member
Dec 2, 2004
576
2
19
Southern Maryland
Jan 2, 2011
#3
  • Jan 2, 2011
  • #3
Although they're more expensive, the link bar style lifters allow the use of off the shelf cams. You should be able to use '94 up roller pushrods depending on the heads you're using.

If you use the late model style spider and dog-bones, you will need a custom reduced base circle cam, and longer than stock (roller) pushrods. Again depending on the heads you use, you can probably get by with .100 longer small block Chevy pushrods.

Regardless of the way you go, you need to check the pushrods to make sure they are the correct length.

After trying two different reduced base circle cams (similar if not the same lift and duration but one with a 110 LC and one with a 112) I decided to switch to the link bar style so I can swap cams with off the shelf grinds. PM me if you're interested in either of my reduced base cams.
 

PoppyMod

Member
Jun 27, 2010
617
6
19
Severna Park, MD
Jan 2, 2011
#4
  • Jan 2, 2011
  • #4
js66coupe said:
What does it take to convert a standard (flat tappet) 351W block to use an HR cam? Is there any machine work involved? Or just parts? TIA
Click to expand...


Hi,
My entry into a roller conversion was through the use of the spyder conversion in my 64.5 5 bolt block. It works well until you feel the need to take your performance improvements to the next level.
I'm currently running the link bars with a billet cam. As mentioned, the link bars are more expensive, but, when used in conjunction with full base circle billet cams, you have the basis for a more stable high performance valve train, when combined with the correct springs assemblies. If you have any flex or any deflections, you run the risk of compromising your cam events and loss in the cams expected performance.
I deem the spyder conversion as an inexpensive entry level conversion process on the road to a full high performance roller conversion. I still have my original components, but, now resides on the shelf.
With any change in valve train components and heads, I would advise checking the PR geometry.
Happy Motoring!
 
A

AlleyCat66

New Member
Sep 11, 2010
9
0
0
The OC, CA
Jan 3, 2011
#5
  • Jan 3, 2011
  • #5
Consider solid lifters

If you're looking for maximum power and you're not concerned with vacuum or smooth idle, consider running a solid roller. Since solid roller lifters are shorter, they have better engagement in the shorter lifter bores of older blocks which helps high speed stability. They're also a lot cheaper last I checked.
 

jerry S

New Member
Sep 3, 2003
1,365
1
0
52.22N 5.12E
Jan 6, 2011
#6
  • Jan 6, 2011
  • #6
You have two options.

js66coupe said:
What does it take to convert a standard (flat tappet) 351W block to use an HR cam? Is there any machine work involved? Or just parts? TIA
Click to expand...

you can use a small base circle roller cam. This entails installing a spider in your block with drilling and bolting. This is the cheapest way to go. I think all you need is the spider and the cam.

the other way to go, which is what I did, gives you more options. It has its pros and its cons. The pros are that it does not use a spider so there is no machine work involved and you do not have to use a small base circle cam. the cons are that you need rather spendy link bar lifters (+$500), roller rockers, and most likely custom-made push rods. If your cam has an agressive ramp, you might also need some beefed up rocker studs and a stud girdle. My costs break down as follows:

custom grind cam: $250
valve springs: $120
Comp cams pro magnum roller rockers: $250
Comp Cams pro magnum roller lifters: $500
Comp Cams stud girdle: $175
Comp Cams composite distributer gear drive: $100
ARP 7/16" studs and nuts: $75
custom length push rods: $100 or so if I recall correctly
 

PoppyMod

Member
Jun 27, 2010
617
6
19
Severna Park, MD
Jan 6, 2011
#7
  • Jan 6, 2011
  • #7
js66coupe said:
What does it take to convert a standard (flat tappet) 351W block to use an HR cam? Is there any machine work involved? Or just parts? TIA
Click to expand...

Hi,
As a follow up to what I and others have commented.
Yes, it is more expensive to go the link bar route, but, it is the right way to go. I have done both conversions and have the experience of performing both them. Yes, you will need to measure for correct push rod length to insure the geometry is correct (this is a "must do" and many of us have done it and and can advise) The PRs are no more expensive than buying a good set of "hardened" PRs. There a number of vendors with competitive pricing, so, Google and go!
As DIY'fer, the cost will be in the neighborhood of $600-700.
This should cover the lifters, PR checking kit, PRs, and intake gasket set.
However, what are you running for rockers? Add another $175 to $250 for rollers.
This is why a good custom built motor is $6000-7000.
Happy Motoring!
BTW, this is my 46 year old 289/333.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

D
First post 289 rebuild question!
  • Ddyer2868
  • Nov 24, 2025
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
3
Views
269
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Dec 5, 2025
rednotch
C
Flat tappet to roller lifters--older block
  • chazmanaz
  • Jan 25, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
245
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 27, 2026
Noobz347
Ford truck engine swap issues
  • keel
  • Jul 7, 2026
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
17
Views
258
Other Auto Tech Jul 13, 2026
General karthief
Engine Forged flat top pistons from 5.0 fit a 351 build?
  • PonyGTrider
  • May 22, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
17
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 1, 2026
PonyGTrider
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
894
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?