• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-

351W in an early pony body

  • Thread starter Thread starter jazzyjeff
  • Start date Start date Oct 14, 2006
J

jazzyjeff

New Member
Aug 30, 2006
4
0
0
Oct 14, 2006
#1
  • Oct 14, 2006
  • #1
Specificly is a 65 falcon but thats irrelavent,any input based on experiance before I attempt this swap and a 5spd?
thanks ,
Jeff
 

rbohm

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
6,698
550
204
tucson,az
Oct 15, 2006
#2
  • Oct 15, 2006
  • #2
first the fit is rather tight, but quite doable. i recommend swapping to 66 mustang mounts as they set the engine a bit higher in the engine compartment making header clearance better. use a good set of shorty swap headers as they will fit better than long tube headers, and you wont notice the performance difference. use a performer rpm intake with an edelbrock carb and a drop over base air cleaner for hood clearance. again it will be a bit tight but this combination clears the hood. if you have any qualms about ubsing the rpm intake, then use the regular performer intake as it is even lower. when you swap to a 5spd, i highly recommend that you also swap to a cable or hydraulic clutch system, as the stock linkage tends to bind. consider installing an electric fan to replace the stock one as you can gain some clearance between the engine and radiator. use a good 3 or 4 core radiator, i prefer copper/brass rads but if you want an aluminum one make sure you get one with at least 16 fins per inch, and two rows of 1" or 1.25" tubes.
 

WORTH

20+ Year Stangneter
Nov 18, 2002
2,166
44
98
Cape Cod, Ma.
Oct 15, 2006
#3
  • Oct 15, 2006
  • #3
Couple of things,

1) the 289 and the 351w are the same length, so there shouldn't be a fan clearance problem.

2) just for ease of future under the hood work, I would consider shaving the inside of the shock towers to add a little width. they are pretty generous with spring clearance, so you should be able to gain atleast an inch on each side. I have even considered swapping to a coil over arangement to add even more room. Again this is not required, but it would make your car alot easier to work on in the future. Just a thought.
 

rbohm

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
6,698
550
204
tucson,az
Oct 16, 2006
#4
  • Oct 16, 2006
  • #4
worth, dont forget that some years of 351w's used a slightly longer waterpump than the 289/302's.
 

WORTH

20+ Year Stangneter
Nov 18, 2002
2,166
44
98
Cape Cod, Ma.
Oct 19, 2006
#5
  • Oct 19, 2006
  • #5
rbohm said:
worth, dont forget that some years of 351w's used a slightly longer waterpump than the 289/302's.
Click to expand...

Swap the pump.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

G
Auto City Classics 67-70 Mustang disc brake kit question/s
  • GOvert
  • Jun 30, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
61
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 30, 2026
GOvert
G
K
351w engine swap
  • Killer351w
  • Jan 21, 2026
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
217
2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk- Jan 21, 2026
Killer351w
K
K
3.8 T5 & Bellhousing to 1987 Lincoln 5.0
  • ks65stang
  • Mar 2, 2026
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
3
Views
325
Other Auto Tech Mar 3, 2026
Noobz347
G
Fox Tire Size for 16" Pony Wheels on 1984 LX Convertible
  • gw7
  • Jun 24, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
117
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Saturday at 7:13 PM
Qtrhrse23
Q
T5 5th gear 89 gt
  • mac_55
  • Mar 19, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
199
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 20, 2026
Mustang5L5
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?