• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

351w Rod Pins?

  • Thread starter Thread starter wickedmach1
  • Start date Start date Jul 5, 2004
W

wickedmach1

New Member
Apr 8, 2003
376
0
0
Austin, TX
Jul 5, 2004
#1
  • Jul 5, 2004
  • #1
What is the difference and benefits/cons between bushed (floating) fit pins and press fit pins on 351w rods? What does this actually mean and what would be preferred on a 393 stroker?
 
F

fastcoupe68

Member
Mar 10, 2004
368
0
17
nj
Jul 5, 2004
#2
  • Jul 5, 2004
  • #2
A floating piston which the rod has a bushing so the pin floats has much less friction. less friction more horsepower. The bushed rod and piston combo also has less side load on the cylinder walls.
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Jul 5, 2004
#3
  • Jul 5, 2004
  • #3
Another benefit to floating pins----- if the pin happens to seeze in either the piston or rod bushing, it may still pivot in whichever location it's not seezed ( ie : the rod or piston)
 

brianj5600

Active Member
Sep 19, 2003
1,964
2
39
Middle TN
Jul 5, 2004
#4
  • Jul 5, 2004
  • #4
And you can assemble your own rod/pistons. No press needed.
 

brianj5600

Active Member
Sep 19, 2003
1,964
2
39
Middle TN
Jul 5, 2004
#5
  • Jul 5, 2004
  • #5
Bushed rods are an engineers answer. Pressed pins are an accountants.
 

Route666

Active Member
Aug 16, 2003
1,652
6
39
Brisbane, Australia
Jul 5, 2004
#6
  • Jul 5, 2004
  • #6
Yep the floating ones are stronger and more efficient. You could coat them with a low friction coating I would assume too, although there may be too much pressure on their surface for the coating to handle, so you might not be able to. If you could, it would give you an even more efficient junction.
 

Max Power

Active Member
Jul 31, 2003
1,774
1
36
St Paul
Jul 6, 2004
#7
  • Jul 6, 2004
  • #7
""Another benefit to floating pins----- if the pin happens to seeze in either the piston or rod bushing, it may still pivot in whichever location it's not seezed ( ie : the rod or piston)""

LOL... if any part of my rod bushing is seizing, I think I would want to know about it right away!!!

Seriously, I think pressed is fine for most street applications....
 
F

fastcoupe68

Member
Mar 10, 2004
368
0
17
nj
Jul 6, 2004
#8
  • Jul 6, 2004
  • #8
Max Power said:
""Another benefit to floating pins----- if the pin happens to seeze in either the piston or rod bushing, it may still pivot in whichever location it's not seezed ( ie : the rod or piston)""

LOL... if any part of my rod bushing is seizing, I think I would want to know about it right away!!!

Seriously, I think pressed is fine for most street applications....
Click to expand...
I am pretty sure you will know right away because you will most likely do some major damage, on the other hand if you have a foating set up and it does happen to sieze you are less prone to damage. If I am correct the floating set up was designed for racing applications and high rpm durability
 

brianj5600

Active Member
Sep 19, 2003
1,964
2
39
Middle TN
Jul 7, 2004
#9
  • Jul 7, 2004
  • #9
I'm guessing that early engines, 1890's, had floating pins, and pressed was to speed production and save money.
 

Max Power

Active Member
Jul 31, 2003
1,774
1
36
St Paul
Jul 7, 2004
#10
  • Jul 7, 2004
  • #10
I think you may be right fastcoupe.

The reality probably is that in street application, seizing one part of the rod won't be noticed until the secong part locks.
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Jul 7, 2004
#11
  • Jul 7, 2004
  • #11
brianj5600 said:
I'm guessing that early engines, 1890's, had floating pins, and pressed was to speed production and save money.
Click to expand...
The 1890's ?? We're digging back a bit far ain't we?
 

Max Power

Active Member
Jul 31, 2003
1,774
1
36
St Paul
Jul 8, 2004
#12
  • Jul 8, 2004
  • #12
LOL! Those 1890s pistons were the size of coffee cans and yeilded a 3:1 compression ratio!
 

brianj5600

Active Member
Sep 19, 2003
1,964
2
39
Middle TN
Jul 8, 2004
#13
  • Jul 8, 2004
  • #13
I stand by my statements.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

K
351w engine swap
  • Killer351w
  • Jan 21, 2026
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
206
2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk- Jan 21, 2026
Killer351w
K
S
Fox Ford 351w Upper and Lower Intake
  • Swhitney
  • Feb 11, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
18
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 1, 2025
Monkeybutt2000
M
E
Alternative IACs?
  • Ethereal_Zer0
  • May 23, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
556
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 7, 2025
CAMTWO1070
U
Knowledge Sought
  • USMCE3ROFP
  • Dec 6, 2025
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
0
Views
196
Other Auto Tech Dec 6, 2025
USMCE3ROFP
U
R
351w stroked to 408 CARB
  • Ric4eyedFox
  • Mar 20, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
17
Views
656
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 22, 2025
General karthief
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?