• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

3900 lbs?!?!?!

  • Thread starter Thread starter vega7891
  • Start date Start date Apr 11, 2007
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3

madspeed

Colonel Mustard
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
8,914
1,332
204
a van down by the river
Apr 13, 2007
#41
  • Apr 13, 2007
  • #41
have local place here that will let you scale for no charge if you do a nice burnout while on the scale!!
 

Modular2v

Founding Member
Jun 30, 2002
3,222
23
99
oklahoma
Apr 13, 2007
#42
  • Apr 13, 2007
  • #42
Your local track should have a scale also.....if its worth a damn at all
 

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end
15 Year Member
Nov 11, 2003
6,945
1,598
223
Northern KY
Apr 13, 2007
#43
  • Apr 13, 2007
  • #43
Well just for the record it's not like i'm TRIED to lighten my car....it's just that there isn't much to it ya know? It's a really bare bones car. I have a jammed full tool box in the trunk and when i go to the track i usually leave it in there to give me some weight over the back tires

The thing is though, among V8 Mustangs (fox's anyways) they didn't get any lighter than the '79-85 no option coupes. My car wasn't a no option car from the factory but the only thing it has that a no option car doesn't is power steering.


OK let's do this.....let's say the car did weigh 3200lbs with AC, spare tire and jack, all the trunk mats and stuff, stereo, smog pump and all emissions, converters on the exhaust, steel bumpers, steel drive shaft, stock hood and stock heavy ass wheels and tires....

Then you remove all that junk and put on Weld fats/skinnies. How much does all that add up to? I guess i'm crazy to think that it's more than 200lbs? I know the AC pump is pretty damn heavy....so is the spare tire and jack, that's probably close to 100lbs alone.
 

gunmetal5.0

New Member
May 10, 2006
144
0
0
Chico, CA
Apr 13, 2007
#44
  • Apr 13, 2007
  • #44
Aliate X said:
3,044 with aluminum heads, no ac, no smog, no front sway without me in it
Click to expand...

Don't forget center console and rear seat and spare tire delete.
 

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end
15 Year Member
Nov 11, 2003
6,945
1,598
223
Northern KY
Apr 13, 2007
#45
  • Apr 13, 2007
  • #45
gunmetal5.0 said:
Don't forget center console and rear seat and spare tire delete.
Click to expand...


Yeah that's another thing...no center console. I always forget about that part since mine never came with one.


Oh, and i unscrewed my radio antenna outside on the fender...that's gotta count for like, .005 lbs or something right? Also it doesn't have any badges...that's another .005 lbs
 

gunmetal5.0

New Member
May 10, 2006
144
0
0
Chico, CA
Apr 13, 2007
#46
  • Apr 13, 2007
  • #46
I could save another 50 pounds-ish I bet if I removed my a/c compressor, smog pump(only things left from either system). Saved a lot of weight when I went carbed won't even get into that. Wiring harness I installed is prolly half the weight of the stock EFI harness plus computer. Saved weight when I switched from AOD to t5. Could shed even more if I removed the tranny cooler in front of the radiator. This has me really curious how much it weighs now. Also the whole trunk section is stripped bare.
 
B

Boss 351

Here sthhhhhhhheeeve take a picthh of my man flowe
Jul 13, 2003
2,433
23
48
Canada
Apr 13, 2007
#47
  • Apr 13, 2007
  • #47
85_SS_302_Coupe said:
Well just for the record it's not like i'm TRIED to lighten my car....it's just that there isn't much to it ya know? It's a really bare bones car. I have a jammed full tool box in the trunk and when i go to the track i usually leave it in there to give me some weight over the back tires

The thing is though, among V8 Mustangs (fox's anyways) they didn't get any lighter than the '79-85 no option coupes. My car wasn't a no option car from the factory but the only thing it has that a no option car doesn't is power steering.


OK let's do this.....let's say the car did weigh 3200lbs with AC, spare tire and jack, all the trunk mats and stuff, stereo, smog pump and all emissions, converters on the exhaust, steel bumpers, steel drive shaft, stock hood and stock heavy ass wheels and tires....

Then you remove all that junk and put on Weld fats/skinnies. How much does all that add up to? I guess i'm crazy to think that it's more than 200lbs? I know the AC pump is pretty damn heavy....so is the spare tire and jack, that's probably close to 100lbs alone.
Click to expand...


Mine is barebones too, no AC, no power windows, no cruise.. the only options I have are power steering and electric mirrors...
 
8

86bluecobra

Advanced Member
Dec 20, 2004
4,265
12
69
B.C. Canada
Apr 13, 2007
#48
  • Apr 13, 2007
  • #48
Boss 351 said:
Mine is barebones too, no AC, no power windows, no cruise.. the only options I have are power steering and electric mirrors...
Click to expand...

have you had your wieghed then?
 
G

GTOreturns

Well-Known Member
Oct 1, 2003
51
17
59
West Coast Best Coast
Apr 13, 2007
#49
  • Apr 13, 2007
  • #49
Modular2v said:
WHAT THE HELL ARE YOU SMOKING?????????? His car is for sure under 3000lbs! He has everything done to his car (weight reduction wise) that i have done to mine and he is a coupe!!!!!!!!!!! I bet the thing weighs 28XX something with him in the damn car!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Click to expand...

Nothing!!
Its hard to shave 500lbs though!
 
8

86bluecobra

Advanced Member
Dec 20, 2004
4,265
12
69
B.C. Canada
Apr 13, 2007
#50
  • Apr 13, 2007
  • #50
Silly me I forgot I have a entire Mustang encyclopedia by Father in law bought me. Ok for the 85 year the coupe only actually wieghs 125lbs lighter then a GT.
Damn book doesn't give the ezact wieght though. Ok a 1979 Base coupe with a 2.3L in it wieghed 2431lbs. Thats lighter then the original 1964 1/2.
 
G

GTOreturns

Well-Known Member
Oct 1, 2003
51
17
59
West Coast Best Coast
Apr 13, 2007
#51
  • Apr 13, 2007
  • #51
86bluecobra said:
Silly me I forgot I have a entire Mustang encyclopedia by Father in law bought me. Ok for the 85 year the coupe only actually wieghs 125lbs lighter then a GT.
Damn book doesn't give the ezact wieght though. Ok a 1979 Base coupe with a 2.3L in it wieghed 2431lbs. Thats lighter then the original 1964 1/2.
Click to expand...

I believe I stated it was the lightest. And spell check is a free item!
 

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end
15 Year Member
Nov 11, 2003
6,945
1,598
223
Northern KY
Apr 14, 2007
#52
  • Apr 14, 2007
  • #52
GTOReturns said:
Nothing!!
Its hard to shave 500lbs though!
Click to expand...

That's only if the 500lbs was there to begin with
 
8

86bluecobra

Advanced Member
Dec 20, 2004
4,265
12
69
B.C. Canada
Apr 14, 2007
#53
  • Apr 14, 2007
  • #53
GTOReturns said:
I believe I stated it was the lightest. And spell check is a free item!
Click to expand...

Is there a spell check here somewhere? I am a horrible speller. I would use it for sure. But getting back to the wieght issue. You can see how the 4 eyes car could easilly be 2800lbs after you gut a little out of them. Heck mine would be right around that wieght with a full interior if I didn't install the 351w and the roll cage.
 
K

KH!

New Member
Nov 17, 2006
44
0
0
Apr 14, 2007
#54
  • Apr 14, 2007
  • #54
86bluecobra said:
No your fox hatch wieghs less then that my friend. Around 3380 lbs I believe.
Click to expand...
Hmm I thought they were less than that. I thought they were 3175.
 
G

GTOreturns

Well-Known Member
Oct 1, 2003
51
17
59
West Coast Best Coast
Apr 14, 2007
#55
  • Apr 14, 2007
  • #55
86bluecobra said:
Is there a spell check here somewhere? I am a horrible speller. I would use it for sure. But getting back to the wieght issue. You can see how the 4 eyes car could easilly be 2800lbs after you gut a little out of them. Heck mine would be right around that wieght with a full interior if I didn't install the 351w and the roll cage.
Click to expand...

Im just bustin on ya! FireFox 2.0 has spell check! The wieght issue is always a great debate!
 

795.0pacecar

lover of pudgy polygamists
Jul 11, 2003
480
0
17
Senoia, GA
Apr 14, 2007
#56
  • Apr 14, 2007
  • #56
There a lot of arguing going on here without much factual support, so instead of arguing anymore, why dont you guys go weigh your cars and post up the results.

I'll go first, my car fully loaded, 3/4 tank, iron heads, no driver was 3110.
 
8

86bluecobra

Advanced Member
Dec 20, 2004
4,265
12
69
B.C. Canada
Apr 14, 2007
#57
  • Apr 14, 2007
  • #57
I already posted mine. It wieghs 2994lbs without me in it.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

T
Newbie looking for some info on speedo gears
  • TDM389
  • Nov 15, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
272
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Nov 16, 2025
TDM389
T
Which Lakewood Front Struts Would Work the Best?
  • 93gtmustang
  • Nov 7, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
169
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Nov 7, 2025
Ethereal_Zer0
E
B
Where to go from here on my build…
  • B0udreaux
  • Jul 14, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
291
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 18, 2026
AeroCoupe
7
Buck Tag Decode
  • 76_Cobraii_mustang
  • Apr 12, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 2, 2025
FoxChasis
F
W
Speedometer and shifting issues
  • wyatt-tetro891
  • Aug 17, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
6
Views
183
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 18, 2026
wyatt-tetro891
W
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?