• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

4.10s not good on 5.0 motor ?

  • Thread starter Thread starter TheDamned
  • Start date Start date Dec 29, 2005
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

TheDamned

"I am Canadian and Damned for it!"
Jul 22, 2003
457
0
48
Montréal, Québec, Canada
Dec 29, 2005
#1
  • Dec 29, 2005
  • #1
That's what someone explained me... on a slightly modded 5.0L, it would be better to go with 3.73 or 3.90 since the RPMs\HP curve isnt like the modular 4.6L, wich performs better with 4.10s...

Here, you can see, from a dyno'ed 4.6L with 4.10s, the green section shows the air bellow the curve where the 4.10s plays...



Anyone has a similar 5.0L tq\hp curve on a sliglthy or stock dynoed 95 GT ?
And what's your toughts on this ?

Thanks...
 

legalize420

Active Member
May 21, 2005
1,541
1
37
South Florida
Dec 29, 2005
#2
  • Dec 29, 2005
  • #2
auto or manual
 

TheDamned

"I am Canadian and Damned for it!"
Jul 22, 2003
457
0
48
Montréal, Québec, Canada
Dec 29, 2005
#3
  • Dec 29, 2005
  • #3
legalize420gt95 said:
auto or manual
Click to expand...

manual.
 

SWYZ721

Member
Aug 24, 2004
208
0
16
Ann Arbor, MI
Dec 29, 2005
#4
  • Dec 29, 2005
  • #4
I'm sorry, i don't quite understand what the blue and green highlighting represents. Splain me?
 

TheDamned

"I am Canadian and Damned for it!"
Jul 22, 2003
457
0
48
Montréal, Québec, Canada
Dec 29, 2005
#5
  • Dec 29, 2005
  • #5
SWYZ721 said:
I'm sorry, i don't quite understand what the blue and green highlighting represents. Splain me?
Click to expand...


Well if you did take advanced math class during college you should do.. it's the "air under the curve" Many principles and formula can emerge from that. Sadly, my english is too poor to explain it to you in details.

But, the green highlights represents where the 4.10s gear are playing and the blue one the stock gears on a 00 GT. That said, with the graph, you can see that the 4.10s plays in the peak RPM\HQ of the car. It's perfect for a 4.6L.

Buuuut, the 5.0L "stockish" motor doesnt have the same curves, so the guy told me the it would be better to get 3.73s or 3.90s since I heard our power curve is more "flat" and less "peaky" in the high-rpms range. Not sure if you understand what I mean, trying to do the best I can do. :Word:
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Dec 29, 2005
#6
  • Dec 29, 2005
  • #6
Go 4.10 if you want to be faster at the track. It is NOT too much gear for a bolt on 5.0.
 
1

1SLO306

My 97 GTP owns you ALL!
Mar 31, 2005
904
1
17
Muhlenberg, ky
Dec 29, 2005
#7
  • Dec 29, 2005
  • #7
4:10's all the way!!!!
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Dec 29, 2005
#8
  • Dec 29, 2005
  • #8
To me, the most important thing would be ................
what are your future plans for the car?

The more serious the mods (h/c/i) the more suited steep gears become due to the power band being moved up and you usually rev it a bit higher

For a stocker ...... 410's may be too much for some folks!

You see some stock peeps cry about 373's being too steep as well.

Grady
 

Mrgreen94gt

SIMMA DA NA!!!
Founding Member
Jul 16, 2002
448
0
0
West TN
Dec 30, 2005
#9
  • Dec 30, 2005
  • #9
What exactly is "stockish?"
 

TheDamned

"I am Canadian and Damned for it!"
Jul 22, 2003
457
0
48
Montréal, Québec, Canada
Dec 30, 2005
#10
  • Dec 30, 2005
  • #10
I think i'll aim at the 3.90s then
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Dec 30, 2005
#11
  • Dec 30, 2005
  • #11
TheDamned said:
I think i'll aim at the 3.90s then
Click to expand...

Whats that gonna save you, maybe 100 rpm less on the highway? Go 4.10 and use a ford racing gear set.
 

TheDamned

"I am Canadian and Damned for it!"
Jul 22, 2003
457
0
48
Montréal, Québec, Canada
Dec 30, 2005
#12
  • Dec 30, 2005
  • #12
Mrgreen94gt said:
What exactly is "stockish?"
Click to expand...


Well it's modding by a poor college student

By stocksih I mean only exhaust work, intake, suspensions...
 

Jackie Chan

I didn't read this.
Founding Member
Oct 17, 2002
2,507
4
48
Orlando, FL
Dec 30, 2005
#13
  • Dec 30, 2005
  • #13
i shifted my bolt on 2v at 5500rpms with 4.10s. the power band in my old car and in my 95 were pretty similar to be honest with you. at similar weights they are running the same ets roughly, i still havent really figured out where i need to shift the cobra though
 

Foxfan88

My Grandpa has great wood.
Sep 13, 2004
2,487
4
0
Miami, Ok
Dec 30, 2005
#14
  • Dec 30, 2005
  • #14
i have 3.90s but i think 3.55s are a better choice.

with my 3.90s, yeah its a nice difference but i feel like car gets revved out too quick.

I have been in my friends bolt on 3.55 geared stang, and i love how it feels and everything. Still got the pull from a gear swap but his gears stretch out a bit longer than mine will.

And also something to consider, gears are overrated, yes they do help out alot buts its OMGOMGOGMOGM PLANT YOU IN THE SEAT like the are said to.

the change from 3.73s to 4.10s is a small one. its not like anything less that 4.10s will be crap and not be able to feel a thing.

Also, you run into traction issues with gears.
before my t5 swap i had the AOD and 3.90s and it was ok. But with the 5 speed the car likes to spin tires.....

Overall i think 3.55s or maybe even 3.73s are great choice. Still very streetable and wont kill you on the highway, plus you will have a more useful first gear. than say with 4.10s
I have 3.90s and i feel my first gear is useless.
 

Jackie Chan

I didn't read this.
Founding Member
Oct 17, 2002
2,507
4
48
Orlando, FL
Dec 30, 2005
#15
  • Dec 30, 2005
  • #15
Foxfan88 said:
Also, you run into traction issues with gears.
before my t5 swap i had the AOD and 3.90s and it was ok. But with the 5 speed the car likes to spin tires.....

.
Click to expand...

you dont run into traction issues, you run into driver issues. with 4.10s i could cut 1.9s or better on street tires
 

SWYZ721

Member
Aug 24, 2004
208
0
16
Ann Arbor, MI
Dec 30, 2005
#16
  • Dec 30, 2005
  • #16
Jackie Chan said:
you dont run into traction issues, you run into driver issues. with 4.10s i could cut 1.9s or better on street tires
Click to expand...

niether, you cut down on the resolution of first gear.
 

SWYZ721

Member
Aug 24, 2004
208
0
16
Ann Arbor, MI
Dec 30, 2005
#17
  • Dec 30, 2005
  • #17
TheDamned said:
Well if you did take advanced math class during college you should do.. it's the "air under the curve" Many principles and formula can emerge from that. Sadly, my english is too poor to explain it to you in details.

But, the green highlights represents where the 4.10s gear are playing and the blue one the stock gears on a 00 GT. That said, with the graph, you can see that the 4.10s plays in the peak RPM\HQ of the car. It's perfect for a 4.6L.

Buuuut, the 5.0L "stockish" motor doesnt have the same curves, so the guy told me the it would be better to get 3.73s or 3.90s since I heard our power curve is more "flat" and less "peaky" in the high-rpms range. Not sure if you understand what I mean, trying to do the best I can do. :Word:
Click to expand...

Sorry, I still can't understand what you're saying.

I told myself I'd come back tommorow and read it again, hopefully with a new perspective. But, I still don't get it.

What do you mean by "plays"?
 

Stangfreak95

add a 4
Founding Member
Nov 4, 2002
3,571
0
0
In your sister. If none, your mom
Dec 30, 2005
#18
  • Dec 30, 2005
  • #18
Even if the 3:90 ration is very good, just jump to the 4:10's (Ford Racing), the difference is MINIMUM and I also think you get the installation kit (bearings, friction stuff, etc) as well with the Ford.
 

TheDamned

"I am Canadian and Damned for it!"
Jul 22, 2003
457
0
48
Montréal, Québec, Canada
Dec 30, 2005
#19
  • Dec 30, 2005
  • #19
SWYZ721 said:
What do you mean by "plays"?
Click to expand...


Shift in that range.
 

TheDamned

"I am Canadian and Damned for it!"
Jul 22, 2003
457
0
48
Montréal, Québec, Canada
Dec 30, 2005
#20
  • Dec 30, 2005
  • #20
Stangfreak95 said:
Even if the 3:90 ration is very good, just jump to the 4:10's (Ford Racing), the difference is MINIMUM and I also think you get the installation kit (bearings, friction stuff, etc) as well with the Ford.
Click to expand...

To a fellow Quebecker :

T'es sure que c'est bon un 4.10s sur un 5.0L STOCK ? Comme un gars m'explique, le 5.0 n'a pas les mêmes peaks que le 4.6L et le shifting range du 4.10 avantage bcq plus un 4.6L qu'un 5.0L. Lui y me dit d'aller vers les 3.73 ou 3.90s
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

S197 mufflers on a SN95
  • patman0911
  • Jan 4, 2011
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
2K
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jan 4, 2011
Mr. Rustypwnz
My new Mods List
  • CRoberts91
  • Apr 28, 2009
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Replies
14
Views
2K
2005 - 2009 Specific Tech May 2, 2009
06bluegt
NA 418, 347, 5.0, & Blown 5.0 Dyno Pull Compare-O
  • final5-0
  • Aug 2, 2008
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
19
Views
2K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Aug 6, 2008
S351Saleen77
C
  • Locked
The Teal Terminator!!!...LOTS of details
  • CarCrazyRDM
  • Jun 4, 2010
  • SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04)
  • 2 3
Replies
41
Views
19K
SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04) Dec 22, 2010
CarCrazyRDM
C
8
  • Locked
FS: 1993 LX 5.0 347 stroker reef blue/black int.
  • 87nitemare
  • Mar 9, 2010
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
  • 2
Replies
36
Views
19K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) May 19, 2010
87nitemare
8
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?