• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-

4.6 to 351c swap

  • Thread starter Thread starter zugsyn
  • Start date Start date Sep 6, 2011
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
Z

zugsyn

Member
Aug 15, 2005
31
0
6
Sep 6, 2011
#1
  • Sep 6, 2011
  • #1
I have a 2001 GT its not looking very cost effective to make big horsepower with the 4.6 considering I already have a built 351c rated at 600hp If anyone and information on this swap like parts I'll need and what not. Any Info would be a big help I've searched a lot of forums and this doesnt seem to be any Information that i can find at least. I've worked alot with the fox bodies so I was hoping the swap might be similar. THANK YOU FOR YOUR HELP
 

mransr

Founding Member
Nov 3, 2000
1,188
36
98
Riverside, SoCal
Sep 8, 2011
#2
  • Sep 8, 2011
  • #2
Clevelands rock...

but the only parts for installing one in ANYTHING wasn't built to have a Cleveland in it will probably have to be made yourself...(I had a 351C in my '66 fastback back in the 80's, I'd give...well...a lot to get that car back)
 
Z

zugsyn

Member
Aug 15, 2005
31
0
6
Sep 9, 2011
#3
  • Sep 9, 2011
  • #3
Well I know it doesnt take much to drop one in a fox body guess we'll have to hit the drawing board on this one
 
D

Deleted member 38176

Sep 9, 2011
#4
  • Sep 9, 2011
  • #4
It'll be cheaper to build/FI your 4.6
 

Maxpowers

Member
Sep 9, 2009
859
2
19
Pittsburgh, Pa
Sep 9, 2011
#5
  • Sep 9, 2011
  • #5
zugsyn said:
Well I know it doesnt take much to drop one in a fox body guess we'll have to hit the drawing board on this one
Click to expand...

I believe the windsor was the same block as the 5.0. That swap would be much easier as you could just find a wrecked 94/95 and have almost all parts needed.

The swap you are doing is not very common and will take much fabrication.
 

Dark04GT

10 Year Member
Apr 27, 2008
758
62
59
NC
Sep 9, 2011
#6
  • Sep 9, 2011
  • #6
Nightfire said:
It'll be cheaper to build/FI your 4.6
Click to expand...

+1. Forge the internals and you can get quite a lot out of the 4.6.
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Sep 9, 2011
#7
  • Sep 9, 2011
  • #7
Is this going to be a street car afterwards? If so, sell the Cleveland, buy an Aluminator and a blower and call it a day. A forged Modular Engine will take all the power that Cleveland will and more and in the end youi'll still knock down 20mpg+. And not that I’m doubting you….but what exactly is done to this Cleveland that it’s making 600hp. I don’t know how many so called high horsepower engines I’ve seen not even break 300hp on the dyno when all was said and done. You’ve got to have a VERY serious piece of hardware on your hands to make those sorts of claims. In any case…it doesn’t belong in a street car.

Sounds like a colossal pain in the ass and a serious step backwards to do the Cleveland swap IMO.
 

Stumbaugh

Member
May 13, 2010
903
13
19
Russellville, Ar
Sep 9, 2011
#8
  • Sep 9, 2011
  • #8
Why a cleveland? Windsor's are where it's at.

All you will need is a 94/95 K member, and a foxbody fuel injection harness. You can use your power brakes if you make an adapter for the power steering. If you are not going to use power steering, then get the brake system out of a fox body or 94/95 car.

The information I gave is about Windsor's. I have never messed with a Cleveland, so I dont now very much about them. But with a Windsor, there really is nothing that has to be fabbed up. You can even buy some Windsor headers for a 94/95 car and they will fit just fine.
 

mransr

Founding Member
Nov 3, 2000
1,188
36
98
Riverside, SoCal
Sep 9, 2011
#9
  • Sep 9, 2011
  • #9
I'm guessing here....but if it was all about making sense and being cost effective not many people would do engine swaps at all ...it would be an interesting project and it could have a great looking engine bay when it's done...

Windsors have a better bottom end, and there are a boat load of parts for them....but those Cleveland canted valve head are oh so sweat, heck the current Ford NASCAR head is a direct descendant of the Cleveland...and not many engines sound as good as a Cleveland with an aggressive cam...

if I didn't have to deal with California smog checks, I'd love to put a 351C in my GT
 

Modular2v

Founding Member
Jun 30, 2002
3,222
23
99
oklahoma
Sep 10, 2011
#10
  • Sep 10, 2011
  • #10
351c isnt cost effective either!!!!!! Trust me, i did one! It would be cheaper to forge the 4.6 and put a blower on or swap in a 351w
 
D

Deleted member 38176

Sep 10, 2011
#11
  • Sep 10, 2011
  • #11
Modular2v said:
351c isnt cost effective either!!!!!! Trust me, i did one! It would be cheaper to forge the 4.6 and put a blower on or swap in a 351w
Click to expand...

Exactly my thoughts. Built/blown mod motor >>>>>> old ass OHV 351
 

mransr

Founding Member
Nov 3, 2000
1,188
36
98
Riverside, SoCal
Sep 10, 2011
#12
  • Sep 10, 2011
  • #12
lots of things aren't cost effective...and hot rodding cars is near the top of that list

but if this is something to do for fun and a challenge go for it...it you are interested in the most bang for the buck there are probably better choices.
 

Modular2v

Founding Member
Jun 30, 2002
3,222
23
99
oklahoma
Sep 10, 2011
#13
  • Sep 10, 2011
  • #13
Cleveland is an outdated engine PERIOD....Windsor has more of an aftermarket and cheaper to make more power
 

LarsD

Founding Member
Jul 2, 2002
2,680
119
123
Texas
Sep 10, 2011
#14
  • Sep 10, 2011
  • #14
IMO you would be way further ahead to sell the 351 and put the money into the 4.6. Or keep the GT as a driver and get a Fox body or 1st gen to put the 351 into.
 

crazystang25

Member
Jan 25, 2009
492
0
16
Sep 14, 2011
#15
  • Sep 14, 2011
  • #15
But why build a windsor if he already has a Cleveland. He was asking what is needed for the swap not if it was more cost effective to build a Cleveland or Windsor. In all honesty if he has a built motor it may be cheaper to drop that one in than to build the 4.6l. Let's face it our mod motors aren't cheap to build.
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Sep 14, 2011
#16
  • Sep 14, 2011
  • #16
I'm still waiting for him to reply to my inquiry as to what's done to it that it makes 600hp. That's a very, very tall order to fill. If it’s anywhere close to stock, he’s lucky to see half of that.


...in which case, sell it and use the money for a blower for the modular.
 
Z

zugsyn

Member
Aug 15, 2005
31
0
6
Sep 14, 2011
#17
  • Sep 14, 2011
  • #17
It is a 351 C block that we pulled out of a 72 Pantera , bored and stroked to 410 cubic inches with forged scat crank, chevy rods and 13.5 forged pistons, ran pantera steel heads ported polished with vicon valves and seals, wieand intake holley 850 double pumper , runs off 102+ octane gas dyno'd at 594 hp... thats close enough to 600 hp to me
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Sep 14, 2011
#18
  • Sep 14, 2011
  • #18
So what you're saying is, that you don't plan on this being much of a street car afterwards? I still think you should find an old Fox body to plop it into....or an early V6 SN95.

Seems a shame to ruin a good running 4.6L EFI car for that?
 

Maxpowers

Member
Sep 9, 2009
859
2
19
Pittsburgh, Pa
Sep 14, 2011
#19
  • Sep 14, 2011
  • #19
zugsyn said:
It is a 351 C block that we pulled out of a 72 Pantera , bored and stroked to 410 cubic inches with forged scat crank, chevy rods and 13.5 forged pistons, ran pantera steel heads ported polished with vicon valves and seals, wieand intake holley 850 double pumper , runs off 102+ octane gas dyno'd at 594 hp... thats close enough to 600 hp to me
Click to expand...

The cost of swapping that motor into your car will equal putting a blower on and getting 400whp. Sell that motor, build this one for boost, and you will be able to out perform that motor in every way.
 

95Vert383AOD

15 Year Member
Jun 10, 2008
1,133
34
69
New Bedford, MA
Sep 14, 2011
#20
  • Sep 14, 2011
  • #20
I would think that rather than hunting factory 94/95 parts you could just get an aftermarket K member for a 94-95. (Like one made by Maximum Motorsports) Plenty of companies make them. Then you need the proper transmission and a transmission cross member. (if cross member different) You will probably need to resize your drive shaft.

Its not so expensive as what people are making it out to be. If you have the motor the most money will be spent on that aftermarket K member and a transmission that will take the abuse.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

J
1996 v6-v8 swap
  • jujuonurmom
  • Oct 28, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
194
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Oct 28, 2025
jujuonurmom
J
E
4.6l auto to 5.4l 6 speed
  • EastanF5
  • Jan 22, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
0
Views
181
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Jan 22, 2026
EastanF5
E
W
Tuner info.
  • wild stallion
  • Aug 28, 2025
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
137
2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk- Aug 28, 2025
Noobz347
J
Wheels-Tires Need Some Help - Brakes Upgrade/Wheel fitment
  • jaygee15
  • Dec 8, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 3 4 5
Replies
81
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 6, 2026
AeroCoupe
G
Fox Tire Size for 16" Pony Wheels on 1984 LX Convertible
  • gw7
  • Jun 24, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
87
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 24, 2026
Mustang5L5
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?