• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

4.6L transplanted into a Shelby Cobra 427 S/C

  • Thread starter Thread starter Shelby Cobra
  • Start date Start date Jun 15, 2004
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3
T

tjm73

Founding Member
Aug 3, 2000
2,418
2
48
Rush, NY
Jun 16, 2004
#41
  • Jun 16, 2004
  • #41
Shelby Cobra said:
tjm73,
Just for you I am re-looking at FFR. I'm having them send me a video and brochure.
Click to expand...

I just got the video. Not bad, could have been better. You'll like.
 

new22003

New Member
Jun 22, 2003
657
0
0
Missouri
Jun 16, 2004
#42
  • Jun 16, 2004
  • #42
FFR sells 10 times the kits any other manufacturer does. You will hear more good and bad about them for this reason. I have ridden in several FFR cars and ever since the mark 2 came out they are fantastic. The foot wells are much better quality than some of the other kits out there. The fiberglass is well done but like any glass part will require prep for a show quality job. Its has one of the best instruction sets out there. Has kick butt service if you get in a bind. And its hella cheap to boot. The mark 3 which will be released soon is setup for the modular motors without any kind of modifications. I like the factory fives as you can build them any way you want from drag to road race. There is 100 different ways to set the car up.

I would go for a bit of a mix of new and old if it was me. Modern brakes, tires, suspension, and a carbed engine. People will know its a kit no matter what unless they are morons. No need to try an pass it off as real. Build a car that you will enjoy and don’t worry how Shelby accurate it is. As long as the body looks right its fine with me. I don’t want all the quirks of the original car.

People get into authenticity but unless people are morons they will know it’s a kit. The odds of seeing a real cobra on the street are insane. Also people romanticize the original car. It was freaking awesome for its time but it had quirky handling, a flexy frame, the 427 style cars didn’t handle nearly as well and were never as successful as the 289 cars, the brakes faded like hell, the bodies were damaged easily, the steering was too quick, the interiors and foot wells were cramped and hot, the transmission was primitive compared to today’s units, and they weren’t reliable. So building an original a car as possible these days would mean building an inferior car.

Don’t let snobby people tell you that you need a concourse cobra. You want to drive this thing every day, have it be reliable, and perform well. A factory five cobra will do it much better than an exact nut and bolt 427sc copy. A properly built factory five or any kit for that matter will out perform an original 427sc in every category and be more pleasurable to drive.

Here’s some links for you
Factory Five mark 3 which will fit a modular
http://www.factoryfive.com/table/ffrkits/roadster/mark3/mk3update.html

Factory Five owners group with great discussion forums and build ups so you can get an idea. No other brand of cobra kit has so much info and people available to help you.
http://www.ffrog.com/
 

BETTERBULLITT

Founding Member
May 11, 2001
1,708
0
37
Home of the Champagne of Beers!
Jun 17, 2004
#43
  • Jun 17, 2004
  • #43
Here you go man, just what you need...

http://www.karkraft.com/mach1_engine1.jpg

Plus you could sell the shaker kit to someone on this site and make some of your money back. I would think you could just use a normal intake for these engines, but you would have to ask some of the Mach guys on this site, don't really know anything about them..

Oh, it is $2700 with 1,100 miles on it
 

bierbelly

Dirty Old Men Need Love Too
Founding Member
Oct 17, 2001
1,598
4
58
Sterling, VA
Jun 17, 2004
#44
  • Jun 17, 2004
  • #44
Do they offer an option with an LS1?
 
B

btolenti

Member
Jun 10, 2003
277
0
16
Gilroy, CA
Jun 17, 2004
#45
  • Jun 17, 2004
  • #45
bierbelly said:
Do they offer an option with an LS1?
Click to expand...

Traitor!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

They would, but the piston slap would shake the car apart....
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

J
Help Figuring Motor Choice(Possible future turbo)?
  • jaygee15
  • Dec 14, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
665
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 3, 2026
Jarhead67
J
For Sale 94 Cobra 408w AOD Project For Sale
  • Labora
  • Oct 11, 2024
  • SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04)
Replies
1
Views
1K
SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04) Apr 7, 2025
Labora
E
Finished my Fox Hydroboost Install - Tips
  • Engineer Duane
  • Apr 9, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 5, 2025
Engineer Duane
E
Which one of these 3 intakes make the most sense for my 331 combo
  • from6to8
  • Jul 25, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
7
Views
2K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jul 26, 2024
AeroCoupe
Specific Cam Questions that Google can't seem to answer...
  • ChillPhatCat
  • Jun 20, 2024
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech
Replies
3
Views
804
2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech Jun 22, 2024
ChillPhatCat
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?