• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

4 Speed Manual Close Ratio

  • Thread starter Thread starter cptam1
  • Start date Start date Dec 27, 2005
C

cptam1

New Member
Dec 27, 2005
32
0
0
Ft Riley Ks
Dec 27, 2005
#1
  • Dec 27, 2005
  • #1
What is a 4 speed manual close ratio?
Im buying a 69 Mach 1 has this option, but the tranny is not there. How do i find one. or rebuild a standard 4 speed to match the ratio.
 

Pbum5

Member
Oct 27, 2004
515
0
17
Minneapolis, MN
Dec 27, 2005
#2
  • Dec 27, 2005
  • #2
Here is some info on what the differences between a close and wide ratio 4-speeds (or any other manual transmission)

http://www.5speeds.com/ratios.html

My guess is you can get a rebuilt one for under $1,000


But if you don’t care about keeping the car all stock it would be a great time to swap to a 5 speed tranny.
 

65ShelbyClone

Founding Member
Sep 9, 2000
4,675
38
119
Antelope Valley, SoCal
Dec 27, 2005
#3
  • Dec 27, 2005
  • #3
Look up David Kee Toploaders on Google. His site has very comprehensive listings of all things toploader.

The close ratio boxes had a really tall first gear and from what I understand is better suited to the track rather than street.
 

1320stang

Founding Member
Nov 13, 1998
4,329
23
89
Edmond, Oklahoma
Dec 28, 2005
#4
  • Dec 28, 2005
  • #4
There are two different 1st gear ratios for Ford Toploaders. 2.78 and 2.32. Typically the small input/output shaft trannies are 2.78 and the large input/output shaft trannies are 2.32. The 2.78 would be considered a wide ratio and the 2.32 a close ratio.
 

rbohm

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
6,698
550
204
tucson,az
Dec 28, 2005
#5
  • Dec 28, 2005
  • #5
my advice is to leave the close ratio boxes for the track or for those with very low gears(3.89 or lower).
 

1320stang

Founding Member
Nov 13, 1998
4,329
23
89
Edmond, Oklahoma
Dec 28, 2005
#6
  • Dec 28, 2005
  • #6
Ummm, the wide ratio boxes are the ones that are typically more desired on the track. The reason for the 2.78 small in/out is this is typically a small block tranny. They make less torque, hence the lower (higher numerically) ratio. A 2.78 1st with a set of 4.11s is going to give you more grunt than a 2.32 1st with the same rear gear. The 2.32 big in/out is a big block tranny, they make more torque so they don't need as low a 1st gear. Be aware that there were some 2.32 small in/out trannies for 390's.

All that being said, David Kee is currently working on a Toploader with a Gear Vendors O/D which looks pretty cool. Rather pricey, but cool non-the-less.
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Dec 28, 2005
#7
  • Dec 28, 2005
  • #7
The problem with the wide ratio's, 2.78 first gear on the street, with something like 3.70-4.30 ratio rears, is the motor peaks out in rpm, before you're ready to shift Almost like having a "granny gear" transmission. I've got a 2.78 Toploader in my Ranger with the 331 and with it's 3.73's and 28" tires, many times you can take off in 2nd, especially when just coming to a rolling stop at a stop sign. In the "heat of battle", I've many times over revv'd it in 1st, simply because it peaks so quickly after nailing the throttle. Even with a small block I'd recommmend a close ratio with these gears. With 3.70 to 4.30's I'd go with a 2.32 1st, if you have the choice. With 2.70 to 3.50's you're better off with the 2.78 1st.
 

1320stang

Founding Member
Nov 13, 1998
4,329
23
89
Edmond, Oklahoma
Dec 28, 2005
#8
  • Dec 28, 2005
  • #8
I agree...
 
C

cptam1

New Member
Dec 27, 2005
32
0
0
Ft Riley Ks
Jan 8, 2006
#9
  • Jan 8, 2006
  • #9
Sorry its been a while. Iv been in the Field. Army talk for sleeping in mud and cold. Stang is due on the 13th, FRIDAY, hope she's early. Im not a devout man to stock but im most likley going to bring her back to the way she rolled off the assembly line.
 

RFMustangGT

Member
Apr 4, 2005
294
0
16
Knoxville,TN
Jan 8, 2006
#10
  • Jan 8, 2006
  • #10
David Kee toploaders rock! My father has one in his 55 T-bird and talk about awesome. I have another one sitting here at the house that has 1500 miles on it that was used on a 66 galaxie. Was going to use it on my 351 for the 69 but the tail shaft is wrong (which is no biggy) and the input shaft is just however too short. (won't sit in the piolt bearing) not sure what I'm going to do with it yet cause I would have to tear it apart to get the right shaft.
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Jan 8, 2006
#11
  • Jan 8, 2006
  • #11
RFMustangGT said:
David Kee toploaders rock! My father has one in his 55 T-bird and talk about awesome. I have another one sitting here at the house that has 1500 miles on it that was used on a 66 galaxie. Was going to use it on my 351 for the 69 but the tail shaft is wrong (which is no biggy) and the input shaft is just however too short. (won't sit in the piolt bearing) not sure what I'm going to do with it yet cause I would have to tear it apart to get the right shaft.
Click to expand...
Swap it off to David Kee for one that suits your application. Sounds to me like you've got yourself a close ratio Toploader from a 390 equipped Galaxie there. I sold him one like it two years ago for $450. He drove over 400 miles (one way) to pick it and another Toploader up that I'd just listed on ebay. Got to say one thing about David, he's dedicated to his business and his customers.
 

caveeagle

New Member
Mar 1, 2006
5
0
0
central Florida
Mar 17, 2006
#12
  • Mar 17, 2006
  • #12
Best 8" gear ratio for a CR Toploader

I Have a Close Ratio Toploader 4-speed in my 67 rag-top. It has the small input shaft. I got it from a friend a few years ago as part of a trade.

I changes the stock 2.80 gears out for a set of 3.25s that I also aquired in the same trade. I am know kicking myself for letting go of the 3.55 gears (that I didn't think I would need)

The probem is that It is a real DOG in 1st gear! My engine has enough torque to be drivable, but I hate it!

I must know chase down a set of 3.55-3.80 gears.

Does anyone have an opinion about my best bet? I am leaning towards the 3.55 range again. I just don't want to be back here again lookin for 3.80s.

BTW if anyone has a good used set of 3.55-3.80 8" gears our there let me know. I would actually prefer a non-posi differential. Less hassle.

CE
 

4MuscleMachines

Member
Jul 20, 2005
417
1
17
South Texas
Mar 17, 2006
#13
  • Mar 17, 2006
  • #13
David Kee is the man to go to. I suggest you call him and also let him know what your needs are.
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Mar 17, 2006
#14
  • Mar 17, 2006
  • #14
caveeagle said:
I Have a Close Ratio Toploader 4-speed in my 67 rag-top. It has the small input shaft. I got it from a friend a few years ago as part of a trade.

I changes the stock 2.80 gears out for a set of 3.25s that I also aquired in the same trade. I am know kicking myself for letting go of the 3.55 gears (that I didn't think I would need)

The probem is that It is a real DOG in 1st gear! My engine has enough torque to be drivable, but I hate it!

I must know chase down a set of 3.55-3.80 gears.

Does anyone have an opinion about my best bet? I am leaning towards the 3.55 range again. I just don't want to be back here again lookin for 3.80s.

BTW if anyone has a good used set of 3.55-3.80 8" gears our there let me know. I would actually prefer a non-posi differential. Less hassle.

CE
Click to expand...
If you truly have a close ratio Toploader then you really need a 3.80 rear.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

P
67 Mustang, with the 302 want to convert auto back to the original manual
  • Pdunn
  • May 3, 2026
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
2
Views
104
Classic Mustang Specific Tech May 7, 2026
Mcmahst
L
93 2.3L 5 speed manual with los of power
  • leadfoot67217
  • Jan 27, 2026
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech
Replies
0
Views
150
2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech Jan 27, 2026
leadfoot67217
L
Mustang II 4 cyl gear hunting and possibly messed up vacuum system
  • oesterreicher
  • May 31, 2026
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
11
Views
197
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Jun 14, 2026
manicmechanic007
7
New from Texas
  • 750mph
  • Jun 14, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
92
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 14, 2025
750mph
7
M
New Member Intro
  • Milalynne
  • Jul 28, 2025
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
1
Views
178
The Welcome Wagon Jul 29, 2025
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?