• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

400hp 5.0

  • Thread starter Thread starter ScottMH
  • Start date Start date Mar 2, 2010
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
S

ScottMH

New Member
Feb 6, 2009
18
0
0
Mar 2, 2010
#1
  • Mar 2, 2010
  • #1
hey guys i have a 92 mustang gt with the 5.0. i want to stroke it out, put alum heads and a cam. what parts/combo should i be looking at to get me in the 400hp range
 

clement

Founding Member
Feb 27, 2001
1,106
52
59
Oak Cliff
Mar 2, 2010
#2
  • Mar 2, 2010
  • #2
400 flywheel or rwhp? et goals? car weight? stick or auto? budget? daily driver/street-strip/or race car?
 
S

ScottMH

New Member
Feb 6, 2009
18
0
0
Mar 3, 2010
#3
  • Mar 3, 2010
  • #3
clement said:
400 flywheel or rwhp? et goals? car weight? stick or auto? budget? daily driver/street-strip/or race car?
Click to expand...

400 at the rear wheel, its a street car wont see any strip time, T-5 manual, no budget, casual use car.
 

NIKwoaC

中國製造
15 Year Member
Oct 31, 2006
5,525
943
214
Chengdu Province
Mar 3, 2010
#4
  • Mar 3, 2010
  • #4
Easy answer? Boost and aluminum heads.

Hard way? High rev, high compression 347.
 
R

RatStang

New Member
Feb 11, 2010
544
0
0
Mar 3, 2010
#5
  • Mar 3, 2010
  • #5
NikwoaC said:
Easy answer? Boost and aluminum heads.

Hard way? High rev, high compression 347.
Click to expand...


... and option #3. Hellion Turbo kit. Leave everything else stock.
 

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end
15 Year Member
Nov 11, 2003
6,945
1,598
223
Northern KY
Mar 3, 2010
#6
  • Mar 3, 2010
  • #6
I went the 347 all motor route. Not quite at the 400hp mark yet, got about 35hp to go but i'm about to do an intake and carb swap...might get a tad closer i hope. Remember that 400 at the wheels is around 460 at the crank if you have a 5 speed so you really need to build it right.
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Mar 3, 2010
#7
  • Mar 3, 2010
  • #7
400hp is easy with a 347. Doesn't take high compression and can be done under the factory rev limiter.

I would use trrickflow fast as cast or afr 185/afr 185 comp heads with a holley, rpm II, tfs R or a victor manifold, custom cam from Ed Curtis @ Flowtech induction, 42lb injectors, 75-90mm tb, 80-90mm mass air, 1 3/4" longtubes. I just designed you an easy 425+ hp
 

stykthyn

I want to measure mine. It doesn't look that tall.
15 Year Member
Jul 6, 2006
5,232
2,652
223
gainesville
Mar 3, 2010
#8
  • Mar 3, 2010
  • #8
Its funny how many people say they want a 400hp street motor and then when its all said and done they are happy with an explorer/cobra top end swap.

I'm with dontgivaratz. Go turbo and leave the rest stock.
 

clement

Founding Member
Feb 27, 2001
1,106
52
59
Oak Cliff
Mar 3, 2010
#9
  • Mar 3, 2010
  • #9
for that amount of power, a 347 + a victor jr + a carb + the right HR + a set of TFS FAC 190s will do it all day long at under 11.0:1 compression at around 6000rpm. and if the cam is right itll drive great too.

and the dynamic cylinder pressure of a typical NA 347 is far less than that of a boosted stock motor (with the stock cam) which will make running on ****ty pump gas much easier with the 347.

ive dicked around with centrifical superchargers for the last 15 years and turbos for the last 12. the biggest thing about getting them to run and stay together is engine management. if you cant spend a lot of time on a laptop tuning to get it right you will be fighting a loosing battle, or it wont make the power and wont run as good as it should.
 

Dino Dino Bambino

15 Year Member
Jun 13, 2007
1,670
87
79
Cyprus
Mar 3, 2010
#10
  • Mar 3, 2010
  • #10
ScottMH said:
hey guys i have a 92 mustang gt with the 5.0. i want to stroke it out, put alum heads and a cam. what parts/combo should i be looking at to get me in the 400hp range
Click to expand...

Since you're looking for 400rwhp (460 crank), you'll need either forced induction on a 302 or a N/A 347. The latter will need to make peak HP at ~6000rpm and spin safely to 6500rpm so you'll need a combo that'll get you there:

347 stroker, 10.5:1 CR
TFS 190cc FAC heads
CompCams XE276HR-12 cam
TFS R-series intake
30lb injectors
1.7 roller rockers
75mm TB with 76-80mm MAF
1-3/4" long tube headers
Dyno tune
 
S

ScottMH

New Member
Feb 6, 2009
18
0
0
Mar 3, 2010
#11
  • Mar 3, 2010
  • #11
im looking to stay N/A. what about 400 to the crank?
 

7upstang91

10 Year Member
May 30, 2008
936
124
74
Florida
Mar 3, 2010
#12
  • Mar 3, 2010
  • #12
Grn92LX said:
400hp is easy with a 347. Doesn't take high compression and can be done under the factory rev limiter.

I would use trrickflow fast as cast or afr 185/afr 185 comp heads with a holley, rpm II, tfs R or a victor manifold, custom cam from Ed Curtis @ Flowtech induction, 42lb injectors, 75-90mm tb, 80-90mm mass air, 1 3/4" longtubes. I just designed you an easy 425+ hp
Click to expand...

This will work!
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Mar 3, 2010
#13
  • Mar 3, 2010
  • #13
ScottMH said:
im looking to stay N/A. what about 400 to the crank?
Click to expand...

Why build a stroker just to make numbers a stock 100k mile 302 shortblock can make? Listen to people that have the parts and have done it.
 

clement

Founding Member
Feb 27, 2001
1,106
52
59
Oak Cliff
Mar 3, 2010
#14
  • Mar 3, 2010
  • #14
ScottMH said:
im looking to stay N/A. what about 400 to the crank?
Click to expand...

holley systemax, TFS heads, an anderson n4 cam and all the accessories on your stock shortblock.
 
S

ScottMH

New Member
Feb 6, 2009
18
0
0
Mar 3, 2010
#15
  • Mar 3, 2010
  • #15
clement said:
holley systemax, TFS heads, an anderson n4 cam and all the accessories on your stock shortblock.
Click to expand...

why would you go with the holley systemax kit then change the heads and the cam.
 

clement

Founding Member
Feb 27, 2001
1,106
52
59
Oak Cliff
Mar 3, 2010
#16
  • Mar 3, 2010
  • #16
i wouldnt use the kit, just the intake. sorry i didnt specify. that is an 11 second combination on motor, stock shortblock with tuning, gear and a good driver.
 

84Ttop

They make new pistons every day, so why worry?
5 Year Member
Jul 2, 2009
5,222
3,254
204
South Jersey
Mar 3, 2010
#17
  • Mar 3, 2010
  • #17
clement said:
for that amount of power, a 347 + a victor jr + a carb + the right HR + a set of TFS FAC 190s will do it all day long at under 11.0:1 compression at around 6000rpm. and if the cam is right itll drive great too.

and the dynamic cylinder pressure of a typical NA 347 is far less than that of a boosted stock motor (with the stock cam) which will make running on ****ty pump gas much easier with the 347.

ive dicked around with centrifical superchargers for the last 15 years and turbos for the last 12. the biggest thing about getting them to run and stay together is engine management. if you cant spend a lot of time on a laptop tuning to get it right you will be fighting a loosing battle, or it wont make the power and wont run as good as it should.
Click to expand...
what he said!
 

SpartaPerformance

10 Year Member
Nov 5, 2006
2,517
61
89
Long Island NY
Mar 3, 2010
#18
  • Mar 3, 2010
  • #18
Scott as you can see by the posts above , there is no clear answer. That is the beauty of the Mustang, so many way to get what you want. it really depends on what you want, muscle or forced induction, small or large cubes, carb or efi, what your budget is, mechanical skill etc.....
 

stykthyn

I want to measure mine. It doesn't look that tall.
15 Year Member
Jul 6, 2006
5,232
2,652
223
gainesville
Mar 4, 2010
#19
  • Mar 4, 2010
  • #19
mostly on budget, everything else follows after. To be done right a 400hp combo will run 4-5k.Then you have to do all the supporting mods to the driveline and suspension.
 
S

ScottMH

New Member
Feb 6, 2009
18
0
0
Mar 4, 2010
#20
  • Mar 4, 2010
  • #20
guess i should come clean, the engine is for a customer of mine. ive built many SB and BB Chevys, fords, and mopars including a 472 Hemi. but they were all old school carbed engines. ive never done a efi engine before. my customer wants to build a stroker and wants around 400hp thats all he told me. the guy has a lot of money but if i can keep the total motor build (including machine work) at or around $5-6k i think he will be happy. so, i know he wants a stroker, heads, and a cam for sure. looks like a intake change is in order too. i am also going to have a t-5 built to spec ones the motor is dyno'd as far as the rear end he never said anyting about it. i dont know if its already done or what
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

9
Does anyone else have a combo close to this
  • 90Stanger302
  • Dec 10, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
232
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 25, 2025
Qtrhrse23
Q
My first post
  • myproGTv
  • May 31, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
2
Views
93
The Welcome Wagon May 31, 2026
myproGTv
W
Need help! 1989 mustang
  • wickedzach487
  • Mar 3, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
6
Views
238
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 4, 2026
AeroCoupe
N
89 LX 5.0 Fuel Rail Recommendations
  • Ncarter
  • Oct 17, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
6
Views
389
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 18, 2025
rednotch
F
Best plugs for carb'd roller
  • forango
  • Nov 21, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
52
Views
960
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 2, 2025
HotFox
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?