400rwhp and I want more--give me ideas

cobra killer

Founding Member

Mar 28, 2001

2,325

0

46

dallas ga

Jan 3, 2004

#41

• Jan 3, 2004

• #41

Pro-m 77mm..It was good to 729rwhp on my car.I use it on every car we build.

Tim

 

Screwed2V

New Member

Aug 6, 2003

1,255

1

0

Misery

Jan 3, 2004

#42

• Jan 3, 2004

• #42

vorteched2000GT said:

micool, you've got mail

Click to expand...

Got the e mail but no attachment.................???

 

V

vorteched2000GT

Founding Member

Aug 16, 2001

69

0

6

Chicago burbs

Jan 3, 2004

#43

• Jan 3, 2004

• #43

Do you sell the pro-m 77's

 

V

vorteched2000GT

Founding Member

Aug 16, 2001

69

0

6

Chicago burbs

Jan 3, 2004

#44

• Jan 3, 2004

• #44

you got mail

 

Screwed2V

New Member

Aug 6, 2003

1,255

1

0

Misery

Jan 3, 2004

#45

• Jan 3, 2004

• #45

2nd email...........no attachment??????

 

cobra killer

Founding Member

Mar 28, 2001

2,325

0

46

dallas ga

Jan 3, 2004

#46

• Jan 3, 2004

• #46

I do,but that wasn't the point of me posting my opinion..

Your car needs to be strapped on the dyno with the proper setup and tuned..Very consevative with 12-14 psi you should have 500rwhp..I'd be very unhappy with those numbers and the mods you have..Your car will make alot of power..It just needs a few things changed and a good tune..Lidio is AWESOME..With the right setup,he should get that car to 500rwhp....

Tim

 

white99gt

Founding Member

Aug 8, 2000

4,649

1

0

stockbridge,Ga(near atlanta)

Jan 3, 2004

#47

• Jan 3, 2004

• #47

I run a pro-m 77 alum one on mine.It works great.

 

V

vorteched2000GT

Founding Member

Aug 16, 2001

69

0

6

Chicago burbs

Jan 3, 2004

#48

• Jan 3, 2004

• #48

Outside of the MAF, what are some other recommendations?

I'm definitely staying w Lidio, has I haven't heard anything neg about the guy. His CS is also great.

 

Screwed2V

New Member

Aug 6, 2003

1,255

1

0

Misery

Jan 3, 2004

#49

• Jan 3, 2004

• #49

Well, two emails but no attached dyno sheet. What was your A/F ratio throughout the run?

 

DeadLurker

Daily Driven

Sep 7, 2001

7,702

0

0

New York

Jan 3, 2004

#50

• Jan 3, 2004

• #50

micool said:

Well, two emails but no attached dyno sheet. What was your A/F ratio throughout the run?

Click to expand...

he sent me the graph but it's a pdf file...I wasn't able to resize it below 80k so that I could post it.

 

Screwed2V

New Member

Aug 6, 2003

1,255

1

0

Misery

Jan 3, 2004

#51

• Jan 3, 2004

• #51

Hope this works.

 

Screwed2V

New Member

Aug 6, 2003

1,255

1

0

Misery

Jan 3, 2004

#52

• Jan 3, 2004

• #52

Let's see if this is any better.

 

DeadLurker

Daily Driven

Sep 7, 2001

7,702

0

0

New York

Jan 3, 2004

#53

• Jan 3, 2004

• #53

 

Screwed2V

New Member

Aug 6, 2003

1,255

1

0

Misery

Jan 3, 2004

#54

• Jan 3, 2004

• #54

OK. So, here's what I don't understand and please don't think I'm picking at you.........just trying to figure this out as my combo is/will be very similar. I made 437 rwhp/404 rwtq with an s trim (3.33" pulley-9.5 psi), AFM powerpipe, untouched bullitt intake, 42s w/ stock meter, magnaflow cat x pipe, and magnaflow cat back.

Your car makes less power with more displacement and more boost. Tim, is it simply the meter here or is there something else going on?

 

V

vorteched2000GT

Founding Member

Aug 16, 2001

69

0

6

Chicago burbs

Jan 3, 2004

#55

• Jan 3, 2004

• #55

micool said:

Let's see if this is any better.

Click to expand...

That's it. Thoughts?

 

white99gt

Founding Member

Aug 8, 2000

4,649

1

0

stockbridge,Ga(near atlanta)

Jan 4, 2004

#56

• Jan 4, 2004

• #56

Its got to be in the tune.SOmething we are not seeing.

Its hard to judge the dyno with out the data from the runs.(aka maf counts,intake temps,timing).

My thoughts-the c&l is pegging but with out the maf counts its hard to know .

I agree with cobra killer and micool.Something is not right in the combo.
Also with that big bore and no cams it is also holding the combo back.

But it should still make more than 400 rwhp even with stock cams.

My numbers in sig are on a .20 over stock motor,P&P heads,cams,untouched bullitt intake,3.1 pulley on a s trim--and pump gas.

Like micool says not trying to bash you or pick on you .Just trying to figure out where the issue is.

 

V

vorteched2000GT

Founding Member

Aug 16, 2001

69

0

6

Chicago burbs

Jan 4, 2004

#57

• Jan 4, 2004

• #57

white99gt said:

Its got to be in the tune.SOmething we are not seeing.

Its hard to judge the dyno with out the data from the runs.(aka maf counts,intake temps,timing).

My thoughts-the c&l is pegging but with out the maf counts its hard to know .

I agree with cobra killer and micool.Something is not right in the combo.
Also with that big bore and no cams it is also holding the combo back.

But it should still make more than 400 rwhp even with stock cams.

My numbers in sig are on a .20 over stock motor,P&P heads,cams,untouched bullitt intake,3.1 pulley on a s trim--and pump gas.

Like micool says not trying to bash you or pick on you .Just trying to figure out where the issue is.

Click to expand...

i appreciate all the input. no offense taken here as i'm the one soliciting your opionions