• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

427,428,429, and the CJ's

  • Thread starter Thread starter D0cks
  • Start date Start date Mar 3, 2004
D

D0cks

New Member
Aug 5, 2003
94
0
0
Mar 3, 2004
#1
  • Mar 3, 2004
  • #1
whats the difference between the 427,428 and 429 and the cobra jets? Im kinda new the the classic mustang engines, can someone explain it to me??
 

bud4660

Founding Member
Apr 14, 2002
459
0
0
Mesquite, Tx
Mar 4, 2004
#2
  • Mar 4, 2004
  • #2
D0cks said:
whats the difference between the 427,428 and 429 and the cobra jets? Im kinda new the the classic mustang engines, can someone explain it to me??
Click to expand...

The 427 and 428 along with the 390 and a bunch more are whats called FE motors.
The 429 and 460 are whats called a 385 series.
CJ and SCJ was high performance parts added to pass. car motors to make HP motors for the sport models.

You can learn about FE motors here.
http://www.network54.com/Hide/Forum/74182

Dont know a web site on the 429/460, I am sure there is one though.
 

chepsk8

Founding Member
Jan 15, 2001
2,203
3
49
Easton, PA
Mar 4, 2004
#3
  • Mar 4, 2004
  • #3
Here's a bit more.

The 427 and 428 are FE series engines, based on the old 352 used in Edsels and trucks. The big difference is the bore and stroke, with the 427 having a short stroke and loving to rev, while the 428 is basically a torque motor, with a long stroke, originally developed to push around stationwagons and heavy cars. Both engines received alot of development work, with plenty of versions and parts available to make them VERY formidable. Unfortunately, like the windsors, they were hamstrung with the small exhaust port.

The 429 is basically a larger Cleveland Motor with the superior heads. Built right, these motors will easilly beat their more famous forebarers. Current Ford Pro-Stockers use a variant of the 429 motor today.

Both SCJ's used solid lifters, and beefier bottom end parts for anticipated racing use.
 
S

sah62

New Member
Dec 11, 2003
5
0
2
Fairfax Station, Virginia, USA
Mar 4, 2004
#4
  • Mar 4, 2004
  • #4
chepsk8 said:
Both SCJ's used solid lifters, and beefier bottom end parts for anticipated racing use.
Click to expand...

The 428 SCJ used the same hydraulic lifters used in the 428 CJ. You can read more about the 428 CJ and SCJ here:

http://www.428cobrajet.org
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Mar 4, 2004
#5
  • Mar 4, 2004
  • #5
chepsk8 said:
Here's a bit more.

The 427 and 428 are FE series engines, based on the old 352 used in Edsels and trucks. The big difference is the bore and stroke, with the 427 having a short stroke and loving to rev, while the 428 is basically a torque motor, with a long stroke, originally developed to push around stationwagons and heavy cars. Both engines received alot of development work, with plenty of versions and parts available to make them VERY formidable. Unfortunately, like the windsors, they were hamstrung with the small exhaust port.

.
Click to expand...
Uh, How you figure that? Small exhaust ports? Not hardly, Not nearly as restricted as the Cleveland and 429/460 heads either. Unlike the 335 and 385 series motors, FE's had excellant exhaust ports, but they were handicapped by crappy exhaust manifolds, just the opposite of the 335/385 series motors.
 
S

Sicarius428

Active Member
Jan 6, 2004
2,085
5
49
Mar 5, 2004
#6
  • Mar 5, 2004
  • #6
The 427 and 428 are from the FE(Ford Edsel) family. Other engines that share the same basic block design is the 352, 360, 390,406 and the 410. They all featured a webbed mains which featured the lower bottom end giving the FE's the nickname the Y block. The block weighed about 650 lbs fully assembled which is pretty hefty. Unfortunately there wasn't a 427 Cobra Jet that I know of. The 427 is cosidered the pinicle of classic Ford engines by many due to its cross bold mains which makes the already strong bottom end stronger, its displacement because there is no substitution for size, its revability reguardless of its size because big blocks don't usually rev that high and its power output. The 427 never found its way into a production Mustang but it end up into some other fords in also a Cammer trim too. The 4.6 and 5.4 blocks are designed similarly bottom end wise to the FE blocks due to its strengths. 428cj power figures are about 410hp and 444ft lbs torque.
The 429 was developed to outdo the 428 in everything. It was suppose to be lighter, stronger and more powerfull. At the time it didn't do any of the above. Ford was too optimistic because the FE blocks had racing to back them from the drag strip, Le Man, a couple of speed records in 1969-70 and not to forget Shelby, so refinement of the FE as Ford's work horse was their focus for years beforehand. The 429cj is nothing to scoff at either. Unfortunately it came out right before the gas crisis which ended the age of the big block. Many racers opt for the 429/460 based block today because parts are still being made for it from many venders. The FE parts for the most part are more expensive, not so common, and not so widely produced. In my opinion the 428 is still a better choice than the 429.
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Mar 5, 2004
#7
  • Mar 5, 2004
  • #7
Sicarius428 said:
The 427 never found its way into a production Mustang but it end up into some other fords
Click to expand...
That statement is debatable, as the 427 was listed as an option in the early 68's,til the 428 CJ was realeased, although no one seems to have seen one. They were also dealer installed in some Shelby's. The 68 427 could be called a CJ, as it had the same cam and heads as the 428CJ's, also had the same intake, although it was aluminum instead of iron.
 
6

67GTA-FB429

Member
Dec 15, 2003
777
0
16
Tri-Cities, Wa
Mar 6, 2004
#8
  • Mar 6, 2004
  • #8
The 427 was discontinued in mid-67.
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Mar 6, 2004
#9
  • Mar 6, 2004
  • #9
No, the 427 wasn't discontinued until sometime in the 70's. It lived on in other applications such as marine and industrial engines.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Weber Carburetor tuning help
  • SchwarzStock
  • Jul 6, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
49
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Wednesday at 2:59 AM
SchwarzStock
R
Electrical Unknown wiring harness
  • Rockobrews
  • Jun 14, 2026
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
4
Views
87
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jun 16, 2026
Rockobrews
R
C
2003 Mustang GT - Rear Tire Size Question
  • Cassiebaebae
  • Jun 29, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
38
Views
782
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jul 6, 2026
Cassiebaebae
C
8
87 lx 4cyl to v8 project 4 lug disc conversion questions
  • 87lx428
  • Mar 24, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
496
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 25, 2026
87lx428
8
8
Foxbody high rpms and surging rpms
  • 86foxseth
  • Jun 9, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
177
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jun 13, 2026
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?