• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Electrical 5.0 Resto Gauge Cluster Fuel Ohms

  • Thread starter Thread starter sav22rem22
  • Start date Start date Dec 31, 2023

sav22rem22

5 Year Member
Feb 6, 2020
397
86
48
North Carolina
Dec 31, 2023
#1
  • Dec 31, 2023
  • #1
Hello everyone, been a while but I’ve been doing a lot of work on my 89 GT and I finally got around to installing the 5.0 Resto “Factory inspired” Dakota digital cluster.

Everything works pretty god despite the fact that the fuel gauge isn’t accurate. I just recently installed a brand new fuel sending unit and fuel tank harness in prep for the cluster. Lmr states that their sender outputs 145 ohms when full and 22 ohms when empty. Dakota digitals pre configured sender setting is 20-150.

They also give you a way to test to see how many ohms the control box is seeing and mine at a full tank is seeing 164 ohms. The fuel gage is pretty inaccurate due to this. The fuel gage won’t even move below full until it drops below 150 due to Dakota digitals pre configured ohm settings.

I’m using 18 gauge wire which is Dakota digitals recommended wire gauge. I spliced the fuel sender wire at the connector at first but the ohm was reading 167 at full and then I spliced at the kick panel and it dropped to the 164.

Besides doing the custom calibration that they offer, is there anything else I should check and look for? I’m running minimal wire lengths to the control box which is mounted behind the radio. I know Dakota digital says 10% is to be expected but if I go off of LMRs specs for the sender I’m out of my 10% range and if I go off of DD specs I’m just barely within 10% but still pretty inaccurate
 

qikgts

Active Member
Nov 12, 2001
117
58
38
FLORIDA
Dec 31, 2023
#2
  • Dec 31, 2023
  • #2
Have you removed the sender from the circuit and checked the output?

A band aid might be to put a 1.5k ohm resistor in parallel with the circuit. That should take the 167 ohms your seeing now to 150.27 ohms. It will however always effect the circuit.

Another thought is maybe the anti-slosh module is the issue here.
 

sav22rem22

5 Year Member
Feb 6, 2020
397
86
48
North Carolina
Dec 31, 2023
#3
  • Dec 31, 2023
  • #3
qikgts said:
Have you removed the sender from the circuit and checked the output?

A band aid might be to put a 1.5k ohm resistor in parallel with the circuit. That should take the 167 ohms your seeing now to 150.27 ohms. It will however always effect the circuit.

Another thought is maybe the anti-slosh module is the issue here.
Click to expand...
I don’t think the Dakota digital box and cluster use an anti slosh module. I’m not exactly sure how it’s regulated other than ohms. The resistor could be a solution I’ll have to look into it I didn’t even think about that.

I haven’t checked the output of the sender yet that will be next on my list. I’m not sure if the factory wiring would cause that much extra resistance given that it’s in good shape so the sender is definitely suspect.
 

sav22rem22

5 Year Member
Feb 6, 2020
397
86
48
North Carolina
Dec 31, 2023
#4
  • Dec 31, 2023
  • #4
I also just checked the reviews on the LMR sending unit which is what I should’ve done to begin with but a lot of people are complaining about the exact same thing. After some testing if I can’t find anything glaringly obvious I’ll try to use Dakota digitals custom fuel sender calibration and make it work that way.
 

qikgts

Active Member
Nov 12, 2001
117
58
38
FLORIDA
Dec 31, 2023
#5
  • Dec 31, 2023
  • #5
When I did my DD cluster in my '85 I wired everything from the plugs for the cluster. I just did a quick search and saw that the 4 eyed cars have an anti slosh module but it's not located on the back of the cluster like the aero cars. Therefore in my application the module was still inline. With your install I now see that wouldn't be the case.

Hope you get it figured out.
 
1

1everett1

New Member
Mar 6, 2024
1
1
0
Rock hill sc
Mar 6, 2024
#6
  • Mar 6, 2024
  • #6
qikgts said:
Have you removed the sender from the circuit and checked the output?

A band aid might be to put a 1.5k ohm resistor in parallel with the circuit. That should take the 167 ohms your seeing now to 150.27 ohms. It will however always effect the circuit.

Another thought is maybe the anti-slosh module is the issue here.
Click to expand...
87-89 new Anti Slosh Module https://www.npdlink.com/product/amp...nits-repro-e7zz-10e849-a-e9zz-10e849-a/216169
 
Reactions: General karthief
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Resolved 93 Mustang 5.0 - Cranks but does not start
  • dan50
  • Jul 18, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
125
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 18, 2026
dan50
Autometer 3318 Fuel Gauge
  • cbac89
  • Apr 6, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
244
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 6, 2025
AeroCoupe
Electrical Oil Pressure Gauge IN Dash Cluster Unresponsive
  • Nine Finger Wrenching
  • Jan 7, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
17
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 8, 2025
85GTStangGuy
O
Progress Thread LTD-ing
  • OX1
  • Mar 15, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
379
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 6, 2026
OX1
O
B
Electrical Gauge cluster
  • brent89GT
  • Jul 15, 2023
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 16, 2023
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?