• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-

5.0 versus 99GT up, Which is better????

  • Thread starter Thread starter revedup
  • Start date Start date Feb 9, 2007
Status
Not open for further replies.
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

revedup

Member
Nov 18, 2005
63
0
6
S.F. Cal,
Feb 9, 2007
#1
  • Feb 9, 2007
  • #1
wrenchers
and gearheads any experience with both???
Areas of acceleration?
Handling?
Braking?
Maintenance?
Parts availability?
Dependability?
Parts cost?
Are they pretty close over all??:SNSign: :SNSign:
Ok Gear heads this is serious
I got an 89 5.0
Its high miles 217,000
Im trying to decide to rebuild and or just buy with lower miles ok!!!!
Rebuild or buy another engine or car which ever is a better deal!!
Considering a 99 gt up maybe even a C-4 yes a c-4 Corvette Maybe?????
Or just restore the 89 mustang 5.0 car!
Got it???????????????
 

Tim2002GT

Founding Member
Apr 10, 2002
635
4
29
Tulsa, Oklahoma
Feb 9, 2007
#2
  • Feb 9, 2007
  • #2
Well, my first stang was an '89GT. Now I have an '02GT. I would say that the newer one is more reliable and has nicer features. However, parts are a hell of alot cheaper on the 5.0's. Plus the basic bolt-on's seem to make more of an improvement over the 4.6 bolt-on's. I think, but I maybe wrong, the 5.0's are around 300-400lbs. lighter than the 99+ also. I would say the 5.0 has a little more power down low, but the 4.6 pulls alot harder on the top end(stock vs. stock). Most 5.0's also came with either a 2:73 or 3:08 rear gear ratio while the 99+ come with 3:27's. Overall, if I was just trying to build the faster, better handling car I would go with the 5.0. You would get more out of you money.

All of this is just my opinion!
 

XxMustang281xX

Member
Jun 9, 2004
194
0
17
Everett, PA
Feb 9, 2007
#3
  • Feb 9, 2007
  • #3
99-04 > all
 

1low03gt

20+ Year Stangneter
May 24, 2004
708
11
38
Cold Hell,Ontario,Canada!!
Feb 9, 2007
#4
  • Feb 9, 2007
  • #4
Is it me,or does it seem that this question is asked like once a month!!
I have had both.Started with a 5.0l like most,and had it for 6 years,then got my '03 GT.
There both good,they both have there negatives,and they both have there positives!
 

tomustang

Psychotic Member
Founding Member
Jun 8, 2000
3,434
2
78
McLean Hospital
Feb 9, 2007
#5
  • Feb 9, 2007
  • #5
revedup said:
wrenchers
and gearheads any experience with both???
Areas of acceleration?
Handling?
Braking?
Maintenance?
Parts availability?
Dependability?
Parts cost?
Are they pretty close over all??:SNSign: :SNSign:
Click to expand...

Why do you ask?

In the 5.0 section, the 5.0 is. http://forums.stangnet.com/forumdisplay.php?s=&daysprune=&f=136

In the 4.6 section, the 4.6 is. http://forums.stangnet.com/forumdisplay.php?f=141

Why do you ask all these questions? Are you here to start crap or do you like asking all the questions you've posted in other threads you started?

Is there a purpose?
 

revedup

Member
Nov 18, 2005
63
0
6
S.F. Cal,
Feb 9, 2007
#6
  • Feb 9, 2007
  • #6
i oviously aint looking for someone starting crap like you.
use ur imagination
 

Mike97gt

it doe snot
Founding Member
Jan 26, 1999
10,633
7
89
the people's republic of massachusetts
Feb 10, 2007
#7
  • Feb 10, 2007
  • #7
ok enough, lets get back on topic
 
T

thomas91169

I'd donkey punch my sister.
Aug 19, 2005
0
0
0
Modesto, CA
Feb 10, 2007
#8
  • Feb 10, 2007
  • #8
are you comparing a motor with a car?

5.0 = motor
99-04 = an entire car

IMO an entire car would be better than just a motor. Cant do much with a motor but look at it, move it around on a hoist, swap parts. you cant drive a motor. you cant **** in the backseat of a motor.


now the 4.6 vs 5.0 debate is old.

4.6 = more reliable since its newer. Harder to mod because it is more complex and more expensive.

5.0 = still pretty darned reliable. Easy and cheap to mod, parts readily available (just open Summit catalog).


IMO it all depends on your goals and your pocket.
 
1

19mustang95

New Member
May 28, 2005
27
0
0
home:key west,FL School:Orlando, FL
Feb 10, 2007
#9
  • Feb 10, 2007
  • #9
the real question is what is the car for? daily driving, weekends, or what...if its a DD i would choose to get a newer car, if its not a DD i would keep the Fox and forge the 5.0 and choose the FI of your choice. just my opinion though.
 

ironmedic

New Member
Mar 18, 2003
1,361
0
0
Puyallup, WA
Feb 10, 2007
#10
  • Feb 10, 2007
  • #10
5.0's rule...nuff said!
 

QDRHRSE

New Member
Dec 31, 2002
1,590
0
0
Palmdale, CA
Feb 10, 2007
#11
  • Feb 10, 2007
  • #11
Both cars have there benefits. From a speed stand point there is no comparison. The newer cars are magical with power adders and hook a lot better, but alas, are heavier and slower. If you're strictly looking to go fast the Fox bodies are probably better. They are easier to work on and the stock motors are little more durable. The newer cars are so much better as drivers....it's a tough call. There is one caveat to this. Newer Cobra's and Mach 1's I think are better than all the Foxes but cost alot more. You can't beat a 2003-2004 Cobra. A stock 03-04 snake is perhaps the most potent sports car ever built in it's price range. For $750 on top of the purchase price you get nearly 500RWHP out of one with the right parts.

I guess the question is not so simple.......
 

5.0's 4 ever

The #1 Stunna
Founding Member
Jan 22, 2000
5,794
0
76
Orlando, FL
Feb 10, 2007
#12
  • Feb 10, 2007
  • #12
Plain and simple it comes down to do you want a foxbody mustang anymore?

Both 4.6 and 5.0 mustangs can be anything you want performance wise.
 

revedup

Member
Nov 18, 2005
63
0
6
S.F. Cal,
Feb 10, 2007
#13
  • Feb 10, 2007
  • #13
Can they handle as good as a c-4 corvette???????????????
Just asking??????????
 

revedup

Member
Nov 18, 2005
63
0
6
S.F. Cal,
Feb 10, 2007
#14
  • Feb 10, 2007
  • #14
19mustang95 said:
the real question is what is the car for? daily driving, weekends, or what...if its a DD i would choose to get a newer car, if its not a DD i would keep the Fox and forge the 5.0 and choose the FI of your choice. just my opinion though.
Click to expand...



Daily Driver
 

revedup

Member
Nov 18, 2005
63
0
6
S.F. Cal,
Feb 10, 2007
#15
  • Feb 10, 2007
  • #15
QDRHRSE said:
Both cars have there benefits. From a speed stand point there is no comparison. The newer cars are magical with power adders and hook a lot better, but alas, are heavier and slower. If you're strictly looking to go fast the Fox bodies are probably better. They are easier to work on and the stock motors are little more durable. The newer cars are so much better as drivers....it's a tough call. There is one caveat to this. Newer Cobra's and Mach 1's I think are better than all the Foxes but cost alot more. You can't beat a 2003-2004 Cobra. A stock 03-04 snake is perhaps the most potent sports car ever built in it's price range. For $750 on top of the purchase price you get nearly 500RWHP out of one with the right parts.

I guess the question is not so simple.......
Click to expand...

Can cobra kick a c-4,s ass????
 

tomustang

Psychotic Member
Founding Member
Jun 8, 2000
3,434
2
78
McLean Hospital
Feb 10, 2007
#16
  • Feb 10, 2007
  • #16
revedup said:
Can cobra kick a c-4,s ass????
Click to expand...

I figured.
 

DropTopPony

Noob Slayer
Founding Member
Aug 13, 2002
2,570
3
48
south jersey
Feb 10, 2007
#17
  • Feb 10, 2007
  • #17
revedup said:
Can they handle as good as a c-4 corvette???????????????
Just asking??????????
Click to expand...

Different type of car, so not really a fair comparison...if you invest the price difference of a vette into a mustang then yes it will handle as well or close and with the extra money for hp will be faster...

but it looks like Tomustang is correct...
just a troll
 

Bolt on 5.0

Founding Member
Jun 26, 2002
302
0
17
Suffolk, NY
Feb 10, 2007
#18
  • Feb 10, 2007
  • #18
Come on man a c4, if your looking for a mustang get a mustang. If you want a vette, get a vette. I personally like all cars but am a Ford guy. Daily driver you want a newer car get the newer mustang. I personally bought my '91 mustang after I sold my '99 GT. Now I miss the '99 but will not sell the '91. If you want better handleing and reliability go for the new edge style. If you want a quick car thats goes stright go for the fox car.

If you do get a newer mustang go for the 2002 and newer? The newer ones have the tr3650 trans in it, batter than the weak t45.
 

revedup

Member
Nov 18, 2005
63
0
6
S.F. Cal,
Feb 11, 2007
#19
  • Feb 11, 2007
  • #19
Bolt on 5.0 said:
Come on man a c4, if your looking for a mustang get a mustang. If you want a vette, get a vette. I personally like all cars but am a Ford guy. Daily driver you want a newer car get the newer mustang. I personally bought my '91 mustang after I sold my '99 GT. Now I miss the '99 but will not sell the '91. If you want better handleing and reliability go for the new edge style. If you want a quick car thats goes stright go for the fox car.

If you do get a newer mustang go for the 2002 and newer? The newer ones have the tr3650 trans in it, batter than the weak t45.
Click to expand...

well thats what im researching now thats what this sites for to get ideas sugestions isn.t it???
If i knew exactly what i wanted guess i wouldn't need ideas now would I?
 

ironmedic

New Member
Mar 18, 2003
1,361
0
0
Puyallup, WA
Feb 12, 2007
#20
  • Feb 12, 2007
  • #20
i love 5.0's because parts are more plentiful. i am hoping to find a 5.0 for my next project car one day!
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

For Sale Borg Warner WC T5, Stock Bell Housing, RAM Clutch Set, Double Hump Cross Member, & Pro 5.0 Shifter
  • AeroCoupe
  • Aug 9, 2025
  • Drivetrain Parts
Replies
1
Views
610
Drivetrain Parts Dec 26, 2025
AeroCoupe
M
Progress Thread mkk50's Progress Thread
  • mkk50
  • Aug 4, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
19
Views
731
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 22, 2025
Noobz347
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
46
Views
2K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Thursday at 9:44 PM
Noobz347
Progress Thread Giving an abandoned 88 GT project a new chance at life
  • jaketractor
  • Jan 9, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
27
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 20, 2025
Noobz347
E
Finished my Fox Hydroboost Install - Tips
  • Engineer Duane
  • Apr 9, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 5, 2025
Engineer Duane
E
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?