• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

5.0L....302 what's the difference

  • Thread starter Thread starter Methodical
  • Start date Start date May 1, 2005
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

Methodical

15 Year Member
Dec 1, 2003
1,192
11
59
Clinton, MD
May 1, 2005
#1
  • May 1, 2005
  • #1
Ok everyone I know this may be a foolish question but what's the difference between a 5.0L and a 302. I thought they were one in the same. I ask this question because when I order parts I am sometime asked if it's a 5.0L or a 302. My response to them is aren't they the same. Help. Bare with me on this one. Thanks
 
M

mustang479

New Member
Apr 6, 2005
22
0
0
May 1, 2005
#2
  • May 1, 2005
  • #2
Methodical said:
Ok everyone I know this may be a foolish question but what's the difference between a 5.0L and a 302. I thought they were one in the same. I ask this question because when I order parts I am sometime asked if it's a 5.0L or a 302. My response to them is aren't they the same. Help. Bare with me on this one. Thanks
Click to expand...
They are the same when the part store ask you this question. 302 is the cubic inches of the engine and 5.0 (actually 4.9) is the oil capacity. So your engine is a V-8 5.0 liter 302 cubic inches.
 

Venom351R

Founding Member
Apr 27, 2002
4,548
41
98
MAINE
May 1, 2005
#3
  • May 1, 2005
  • #3



5.0 = 302 its the samething
 
W

whitesn95GT

New Member
Apr 8, 2005
7
0
0
May 1, 2005
#4
  • May 1, 2005
  • #4
mustang479 said:
They are the same when the part store ask you this question. 302 is the cubic inches of the engine and 5.0 (actually 4.9) is the oil capacity. So your engine is a V-8 5.0 liter 302 cubic inches.
Click to expand...


Yes and no, both 302 and 5.0L mean the displacement of the motor. They are simply two different units of measurement. It's like saying "I just ran 1 mile" vs saying "I just ran 5,280 feet." Like mustang479 said, when someone says 302 or 350 or 393 or 427, they mean cubic inches, when they say 5.0L the "L" = liters. So when someone says 5.0 or 302, know that they mean the same thing - the displacement of the motor. For example, the newer Firebirds/Camaro's are 5.7L, but that doesn't mean they put 5.7 Quarts of oil in their car, simply that the engine displacement is 5.7 L (approx 350 cubic inches). Hope I clarified it, not made it more confusing for ya . Check out www.howstuffworks.com and goto their "Auto" section, LOTS of good resources to give you an idea on how stuff works .

Take care,
Matt
 

GRGT1994

New Member
Sep 22, 2004
1,034
0
0
May 1, 2005
#5
  • May 1, 2005
  • #5
Both are a measure of the collective combustion chambers of all 8 cylinders, which is 5.0 liters or 302 cubic inches.

By the way, for those of the anal variety out there, 5.0 liters equals 305.11872 cubic inches, and 302 cubic inches equals 4.94889333 liters. My guess is that the precise cubic inch spec for our engines is around 302.4 cubic inches, which would round up to 5.0 liters.
 

Rootus

Officially Addicted
Feb 8, 2003
6,659
1
0
Portland, Oregon
May 1, 2005
#6
  • May 1, 2005
  • #6
GRGT1994 said:
My guess is that the precise cubic inch spec for our engines is around 302.4 cubic inches, which would round up to 5.0 liters.
Click to expand...
The precise spec is 4" bore, 3" stroke. ((pi * 4) * 3) * 8 = 301.592895. The decision to call it a 5.0L was a marketing one.
 
F

fiveohh94gt

New Member
Dec 26, 2003
277
0
0
May 1, 2005
#7
  • May 1, 2005
  • #7
yep, 5.0L was all for marketing because they already had the 4.9L 300c.i. straight six engine and 5.0 sounds better too
 

sociopath5.0

New Member
Jul 7, 2004
155
0
0
somewhere near Louisville, KY
May 1, 2005
#8
  • May 1, 2005
  • #8
fiveohh94gt said:
yep, 5.0L was all for marketing because they already had the 4.9L 300c.i. straight six engine and 5.0 sounds better too
Click to expand...

It definitely sounds better than 4.9 or 4.6...IMHFO.
 

MysteryMachine

Active Member
Jun 21, 2003
1,835
2
39
Parkesburg, PA
May 1, 2005
#9
  • May 1, 2005
  • #9
What bugs me is when you get parts and you say 94 Mustang GT and they go V-6 or V-8. V-8 JACKASS I said GT GT=V-8
 

4Jenna

Founding Member
Sep 12, 2001
4,326
6
69
AZ
May 1, 2005
#10
  • May 1, 2005
  • #10
ITs 5.0hhhhh we all know that
 

Slow5.0

Active Member
Feb 13, 2003
2,554
0
46
Portland, OR
May 1, 2005
#11
  • May 1, 2005
  • #11
There is two messurment of engine USA and Europe (or rest of world)
302ci (cubic inches) and 5.0L (liter) or 5000ccm (cubic centimetars) but our motors have 4.9XXccm
 
J

jasonlee0704

New Member
Feb 3, 2004
219
0
0
Kansas City, MO
May 1, 2005
#12
  • May 1, 2005
  • #12
They might also be asking if you have a 5.0L HO or a normal 302. Although I don't know anybody that would mistake a 94-95 for a non-HO.
 
Q

qwick94GT

New Member
Nov 20, 2004
108
0
0
May 1, 2005
#13
  • May 1, 2005
  • #13
I had something to say, but I can't stop looking at Rootus avatar...
 

5ohhh

Member
Mar 31, 2005
88
0
6
Loveville, MD
May 1, 2005
#14
  • May 1, 2005
  • #14
eades5.0 said:
ITs 5.0hhh we all know that
Click to expand...

heyyyyy thats my screen name!!!
 

Swarzkopf

Member
Sep 23, 2004
973
0
16
Pittsburgh
May 1, 2005
#15
  • May 1, 2005
  • #15
"5.0" and "302" describe the same displacement Ford V8.

However, in my head, when I hear "302" I think of an old carbed motor, whereas when I here "5.0" I think of the EFI 5.0 HO in our Mustangs.
 

Methodical

15 Year Member
Dec 1, 2003
1,192
11
59
Clinton, MD
May 2, 2005
#16
  • May 2, 2005
  • #16
MysteryMachine said:
What bugs me is when you get parts and you say 94 Mustang GT and they go V-6 or V-8. V-8 JACKASS I said GT GT=V-8
Click to expand...


Yeah there's been times when I say I have a 95 Cobra and they'd asked is that a 4.6 - the Ford dealership can you believe it. I'd have to remind them that it's the "Last" 5.0 made. Now, when I go to say a Autozone and I'd say "I have a 95 Cobra" - they'd ask is that a Mustang - just reminds me to be very very careful when looking for parts. I always have to tell them to let me see the screen.

Thanks everyone. I'm familiar with 302 being the cubic inch of the motor and 5.0 being the liter. I just thought maybe I was missing something when I was asked these questions. Peace.
 

SeventyMach1

Keep it lubed .... keep it straight .... and keep
Mar 30, 2005
1,940
3
36
North Carolina
May 2, 2005
#17
  • May 2, 2005
  • #17
mustang479 said:
They are the same when the part store ask you this question. 302 is the cubic inches of the engine and 5.0 (actually 4.9) is the oil capacity. So your engine is a V-8 5.0 liter 302 cubic inches.
Click to expand...



Oil capacity? I don't think so......
 
J

jasonlee0704

New Member
Feb 3, 2004
219
0
0
Kansas City, MO
May 2, 2005
#18
  • May 2, 2005
  • #18
Swarzkopf said:
"5.0" and "302" describe the same displacement Ford V8.

However, in my head, when I hear "302" I think of an old carbed motor, whereas when I here "5.0" I think of the EFI 5.0 HO in our Mustangs.
Click to expand...


That's what I think of too.

The 5.0L makes me think of a Fox body or 94-95 engine.

When I hear "302", it makes me think of a 60s-70s engine, like a Boss 302.
 

TheDamned

"I am Canadian and Damned for it!"
Jul 22, 2003
457
0
48
Montréal, Québec, Canada
May 2, 2005
#19
  • May 2, 2005
  • #19
Methodical said:
Yeah there's been times when I say I have a 95 Cobra and they'd asked is that a 4.6 - the Ford dealership can you believe it. I'd have to remind them that it's the "Last" 5.0 made. Now, when I go to say a Autozone and I'd say "I have a 95 Cobra" - they'd ask is that a Mustang - just reminds me to be very very careful when looking for parts. I always have to tell them to let me see the screen.

Thanks everyone. I'm familiar with 302 being the cubic inch of the motor and 5.0 being the liter. I just thought maybe I was missing something when I was asked these questions. Peace.
Click to expand...


Same here, when I goto to a speed shop I mention it's a 95 GT 5.0L MOTOR ... because most of the sellers are honduh addicts and they dont know **** about V8s.
 

SeventyMach1

Keep it lubed .... keep it straight .... and keep
Mar 30, 2005
1,940
3
36
North Carolina
May 2, 2005
#20
  • May 2, 2005
  • #20
Yeah, I know the feeling. I've had several of them ask me, "did you swap that motor in there?" Kinda' gets old. One guy even 'assumed' I had a 4.6 stroker when I told him it was a 5.0.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

E
Serpentine ac bracket differences
  • EspaceF1Fan
  • Apr 1, 2026
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech
Replies
1
Views
98
2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech Apr 1, 2026
OX1
O
D
Engine HO cam in non HO roller block ‘93 f150
  • DanC1993f150
  • Mar 21, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
233
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 29, 2026
General karthief
B
Subframe connector question
  • B0udreaux
  • Jan 27, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
880
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 5, 2026
rednotch
M
Engine Unexplainable Exhaust Pop and Gurgle
  • Mrnissen122
  • Feb 14, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
12
Views
510
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 18, 2026
Noobz347
A
Help ID - Turbo GT, SVO differences
  • aldoelmalo
  • Jun 2, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
61
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 2, 2026
aldoelmalo
A
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?