• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

5 lug conversion done, pic

  • Thread starter Thread starter SVTFreak
  • Start date Start date Apr 29, 2011
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
S

SVTFreak

Member
Jan 11, 2006
106
6
18
Apr 29, 2011
#1
  • Apr 29, 2011
  • #1
Fini!

View attachment 190476
 

LarsD

Founding Member
Jul 2, 2002
2,680
119
123
Texas
Apr 29, 2011
#2
  • Apr 29, 2011
  • #2
Grats! Never seen those wheels before, what kind are they?
 
S

SVTFreak

Member
Jan 11, 2006
106
6
18
Apr 29, 2011
#3
  • Apr 29, 2011
  • #3
American racing lemans. Havnt made them in a few years. Kenny brown used them on their 1994 stalker mustang. I had em on my 95 and kept them. Blasted and painted them argent for this project.
 

7upstang91

10 Year Member
May 30, 2008
936
124
74
Florida
Apr 29, 2011
#4
  • Apr 29, 2011
  • #4
Looks great. I want to do a 5 lug conversion one day.
 

Adams91LX

Active Member
Dec 9, 2003
689
12
29
Plano, TX
Apr 29, 2011
#5
  • Apr 29, 2011
  • #5
whats the specs... front and rear disc?
 

Flavadave4

Active Member
Nov 28, 2003
1,044
21
49
Utica, NY
Apr 29, 2011
#6
  • Apr 29, 2011
  • #6
Killer looking coupe!
 
S

SVTFreak

Member
Jan 11, 2006
106
6
18
Apr 29, 2011
#7
  • Apr 29, 2011
  • #7
Adam, yes, straight 1995 gt sn95 conversion. Front and rear disks, master cylinder and kept 91 booster. I did lose the factory prop valve and built my own under the mc with adj prop valve and a line lock.
Thanks flava!
 

citmov

10 Year Member
Sep 25, 2009
632
12
49
Chi-town
Apr 29, 2011
#8
  • Apr 29, 2011
  • #8
Congrats! I'm right behind you on the conversion! Gonna take me a little more time. Can't do anything until my buddy is done with his car. No room in the garage haha.
 

Chrome_Rust

Member
Dec 5, 2008
530
1
17
Findlay, Ohio
Apr 29, 2011
#9
  • Apr 29, 2011
  • #9
Dude! Sick notch! I love the wheels!
 
T

trlprk

Member
Nov 25, 2010
58
0
6
Rhode Island
Apr 30, 2011
#10
  • Apr 30, 2011
  • #10
SVTFreak said:
Adam, yes, straight 1995 gt sn95 conversion. Front and rear disks, master cylinder and kept 91 booster. I did lose the factory prop valve and built my own under the mc with adj prop valve and a line lock.
Thanks flava!
Click to expand...

Looks great man. I am in the process of doing the same swap, slowly collecting parts right now. My question is how do the brakes feel. I have only a M/C and a booster to purchace and I thought a 91 booster would be enough. Also have you lowered the car, and if so what springs it looks really good.
 
S

SVTFreak

Member
Jan 11, 2006
106
6
18
Apr 30, 2011
#11
  • Apr 30, 2011
  • #11
Trlrprk, I used the 95 master cylinder and stock 91 booster. The brakes are a little stiffer than stock and the pedal is a little farther to floor. Feel is great but I may lengthen the rod just a touch one day to raise the pedal some. I have no complaints about the feel, though. It's great, just different than stock.
 
S

SVTFreak

Member
Jan 11, 2006
106
6
18
Apr 30, 2011
#12
  • Apr 30, 2011
  • #12
On a side note, I did completely remove the factory proportioning valve. I came out of front port to an adjustable prop valve to factory rear line. The rear port goes to a line lock which has three outlet ports. One each goes go lines to front brakes. Third one is plugged.
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,160
17,854
224
Massachusetts
Apr 30, 2011
#13
  • Apr 30, 2011
  • #13
Using an MC that is undersized 1/16" makes up well for retaining the stock booster.

More than one way to skin a cat. Those brakes require the 1 1/16" mc woth the larger booster, but using the stock booster with an undersized 1" mc compensates nicely.
 
S

SVTFreak

Member
Jan 11, 2006
106
6
18
Apr 30, 2011
#14
  • Apr 30, 2011
  • #14
I hear ya man, and they might would be alittle lighter feeling with the SN booster, but im perfectly ok with their feel as is. Pressure needed to stop is ideal for me, but i like a little heavier. Last few projects didnt even have assisted brakes. Like i said, the pedal is a little lower than i like, but still well within reason for driving. Thats easily solved by lengthening the rod some. Curious to know if SN brake pushrods are the same length as Fox. Anyone know?
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,160
17,854
224
Massachusetts
May 1, 2011
#15
  • May 1, 2011
  • #15
By pedal being lower, are you saying the stroke is long? In other words, you are finding the pedal going down pretty far to get good brake modulation?

That's a function of the master cylinder size. Going up to a 1 1/16" will shorten the stroke, but result in a firmer pedal. How acceptable this is, is up to you. You can always add an sn95 at this point to increase assist.

Adjusting the pedal rod just takes up "dead travel" before the brakes start to do anything. Adjust it too far out, and the brakes will drag slightly as you drive
 
S

SVTFreak

Member
Jan 11, 2006
106
6
18
May 2, 2011
#16
  • May 2, 2011
  • #16
Mustang5L5 said:
By pedal being lower, are you saying the stroke is long? In other words, you are finding the pedal going down pretty far to get good brake modulation?
Click to expand...

Nope, brake modulation is fine. Its travel is nearly identical to before, its just sits lower than before at rest. AKA, not as high as it was before.

Do they make an 1 1/16" thatll bolt into a fox?
 

Adams91LX

Active Member
Dec 9, 2003
689
12
29
Plano, TX
May 2, 2011
#17
  • May 2, 2011
  • #17
Yes they do make a 1 1/16" MC... My MC is out of a 97 (94-98 non-cobra's) V6/GT and is an 1 1/16" bore... I have 93 cobra rear disc, and 95 V6/GT front discs... Pedal is firm but not overly stiff at all... Stock fox booster, adjustable prop valve, gutted stock prop valve.
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,160
17,854
224
Massachusetts
May 2, 2011
#18
  • May 2, 2011
  • #18
SVTFreak said:
Nope, brake modulation is fine. Its travel is nearly identical to before, its just sits lower than before at rest. AKA, not as high as it was before.

Do they make an 1 1/16" thatll bolt into a fox?
Click to expand...

Thats kinda odd, because you didn't swap the Booster....right? Adjusting the booster rod may help this.

The 94-95 gt and 94-98 v6 mc is a 1 1/16" bore mc. It will make the pedal firm with the stock booster. You might want to try adjusting the booster rod first.

The mc is a direct swap with 1993 cobra mc. No adapters needed. Cheap tp get used too.
 
S

SVTFreak

Member
Jan 11, 2006
106
6
18
May 2, 2011
#19
  • May 2, 2011
  • #19
That's what I have is a 94 gt mc. The booster is stock. That's why I think the rod length is too short. Havnt measured yet but I'm thinking less than a 1/4" would make it about right. Only need the pedal to come up an inch and a half or so so be back to stock. Like I said, nit picky. It's great like it is so may not even bother with it lol
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,160
17,854
224
Massachusetts
May 2, 2011
#20
  • May 2, 2011
  • #20
Hmm, for some reason I read this thread as you were using the 1993 cobra 1" mc.

Well, that's the right mc to use.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

8
87 lx 4cyl to v8 project 4 lug disc conversion questions
  • 87lx428
  • Mar 24, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
466
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 25, 2026
87lx428
8
F
5 lug disc brake pad help
  • Foxrider714
  • Nov 14, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
218
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Nov 17, 2025
KRUISR
Y
Resolved 5 lug conversion
  • Ybfav84
  • Dec 21, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
564
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 21, 2024
AeroCoupe
removable hardtop/ foxanne build thread.
  • foxannne
  • Mar 30, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
6
Views
303
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 1, 2025
Stopman33
Y
Brake issues again smh
  • Ybfav84
  • Mar 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
596
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 10, 2025
DR1962
D
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?