• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-

68 mustang coupe /2JZ turbo swap

  • Thread starter Thread starter gowest
  • Start date Start date Oct 31, 2009
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
1 of 3 Next Last

gowest

Member
Dec 22, 2004
38
0
7
Bangkok, Thailand
Oct 31, 2009
#1
  • Oct 31, 2009
  • #1
What do you think of such swap??
Good ...... Bad
 

Attachments

  • 11112.webp
    28.5 KB · Views: 5,273
  • 424242.webp
    55.4 KB · Views: 7,248

gowest

Member
Dec 22, 2004
38
0
7
Bangkok, Thailand
Oct 31, 2009
#2
  • Oct 31, 2009
  • #2
It does have rack&pinnion and IRS set up, too.





 

ThePumpkin

New Member
Jan 26, 2009
55
0
0
Missouri
Oct 31, 2009
#3
  • Oct 31, 2009
  • #3
thats badass!
Someone watch tokyo drift much? I love it.
 
C

C0V3R

Member
Feb 14, 2003
524
0
16
Australia
Oct 31, 2009
#4
  • Oct 31, 2009
  • #4
Nice! Is it auto or manual?
 

68stang351

Founding Member
May 16, 2002
850
9
39
Savoy TX
Oct 31, 2009
#5
  • Oct 31, 2009
  • #5
 
6

68EFIvert

Member
Jan 13, 2007
639
0
17
Camas, Washington
Oct 31, 2009
#6
  • Oct 31, 2009
  • #6
How about a Ford engine with a turbo.
 

Edster

Founding Member
Aug 13, 2000
500
1
19
League City, Texas
Oct 31, 2009
#7
  • Oct 31, 2009
  • #7
Very interesting, I've thought of the same myself. But, how much cutting/modification wold have to be done? Also would it be worth the money. Would you get more performance w/ better significantly mpg?
Is the entire engine/turbo lighter than the V8?

I also noticed that the vehicle is right hand drive, I suspect this has something to do interference w/ the steering column.

I myself like the idea of modern technology in a classic.
 

65ShelbyClone

Founding Member
Sep 9, 2000
4,675
38
119
Antelope Valley, SoCal
Oct 31, 2009
#8
  • Oct 31, 2009
  • #8


The 2JZ-GTE is great engine, but IMO....not in a Mustang for all the reasons people make fun of Supras(powerband, exhaust note, etc). Judging by the huge e-brake handle next to the shifter, it's destined to be a drift car, also IMO. With RHD, it appears to be in or headed for either Britain, Australia, or Asia. With that in mind, I have heard people say that American drivelines and parts are not always easy to get in Asia, but Japanese drivelines are. I'll give them the benefit of the doubt and assume the 2JZ was just easier and/or cheaper to get than a Dart-blocked 302/T56.
 

wicked93gs

15 Year Member
Sep 30, 2006
1,198
228
93
Nashville TN
Oct 31, 2009
#9
  • Oct 31, 2009
  • #9
its junk if you ask me, if you want a DOHC turbo straight six...stick with a Ford engine...try the 4.0L DOHC Falcon XR6 engine...makes a good 60HP more stock anyway, dont use that thing in a classic mustang(not to say the 2JZ snt good, but keep it ford at the least)

p.s. a lot of 302 aftermarket parts are made in china...I'll be willing to bet finding parts would be easy
 

Rusty67

20+ Year Stangneter
Dec 3, 2002
3,749
37
109
LA, CA
Oct 31, 2009
#10
  • Oct 31, 2009
  • #10
wicked93gs said:
its junk if you ask me, if you want a DOHC turbo straight six...stick with a Ford engine...try the 4.0L DOHC Falcon XR6 engine...makes a good 60HP more stock anyway, dont use that thing in a classic mustang(not to say the 2JZ snt good, but keep it ford at the least)

p.s. a lot of 302 aftermarket parts are made in china...I'll be willing to bet finding parts would be easy
Click to expand...

Oh how my friends and I long for Ford to bring the Falcon to America with its sexy 4.0L DOHC I6 motor.....

As far as this car goes..... its definitely interesting and you can't fault them for putting that motor in the car if it is going somewhere that the V8 parts are hard to find and they are racing.

As for me, I don't like it... no sir I don't like it....
 

EPIK

Member
Jul 3, 2004
796
1
16
LEFT COAST
Oct 31, 2009
#11
  • Oct 31, 2009
  • #11
I would rather see that under the hood than an LSX powerplant....
 

65ShelbyClone

Founding Member
Sep 9, 2000
4,675
38
119
Antelope Valley, SoCal
Oct 31, 2009
#12
  • Oct 31, 2009
  • #12
wicked93gs said:
p.s. a lot of 302 aftermarket parts are made in china...I'll be willing to bet finding parts would be easy
Click to expand...

Low-quality parts maybe. Also, the XR6 turbo engine only has a 20hp advantage over the 2JZ, not 60. It is about the only modern I-6 I would consider putting in an old Mustang, though. And that 1000bhp one with the glowing header on YouTube.....
 

wicked93gs

15 Year Member
Sep 30, 2006
1,198
228
93
Nashville TN
Oct 31, 2009
#13
  • Oct 31, 2009
  • #13
Supras were 280HP(like just about everything in Japan) the XR6 was rated at(double checks) 328HP....my bad, only 48 HP more

Ford Falcon XR6 Turbo - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Toyota JZ engine - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

p.s. my bad, the 2jz engine was 320HP for the US and europe...the japaneese engines were 280 though,falcon is 354 ft/lbs, supra is 335 ft/lbs(us and europe)
 

wicked93gs

15 Year Member
Sep 30, 2006
1,198
228
93
Nashville TN
Oct 31, 2009
#14
  • Oct 31, 2009
  • #14
a lot of aftermarket parts you buy at autozone or advance auto are made in china...sure they are low quality, but they do work for the most part....besides, if you wan quality stuff, order it from Australia
 

rbohm

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
6,698
550
204
tucson,az
Oct 31, 2009
#15
  • Oct 31, 2009
  • #15
not a bad swap, but if i ever build a turboed six, it will be a ford 250 with a classicinlines aluminum head. we have a guy on the fordsix website that has a falcon with a turboed 250 that runs in the 10's, and is still a street driven car.
 

65ShelbyClone

Founding Member
Sep 9, 2000
4,675
38
119
Antelope Valley, SoCal
Oct 31, 2009
#16
  • Oct 31, 2009
  • #16
I know the junk in BlottoZone is often Chinese. I was talking about parts needed to make the same kind of power a stock 2JZ can handle like blocks, heads, pistons, rods, cranks, cams, etc. The high-end parts available here are either made here or in Australia. With Chinese manufacturers' reputation for cheating on metallurgy, I wouldn't use any of the above parts in a performance engine if that's where they were made or if that's all I could get. I would use a 2JZ-GTE or RB26DETT instead.

wicked93gs said:
p.s. my bad, the 2jz engine was 320HP for the US and europe...the japaneese engines were 280 though,
Click to expand...

The Japanese market engines have the same power, they were just rated lower on paper per the "280hp agreement." Another example is the Skyline Nismo 400R; it was also officially rated at 280hp while the actual output was 400hp.
 

wicked93gs

15 Year Member
Sep 30, 2006
1,198
228
93
Nashville TN
Oct 31, 2009
#17
  • Oct 31, 2009
  • #17
The export version of the 2JZ-GTE achieved its higher power output with the use of newer stainless steel turbochargers (ceramic for Japanese models), revised camshafts, and larger injectors (550 cc/min for export, 440 cc/min for Japanese). The mechanical similarities between the Japanese-specification CT20 turbine and export-specification CT12B turbine allow interchangeability of the exhaust-side propeller shaft. Additionally, the export-exclusive CT12B turbine received more durable turbine housings and stainless steel turbine and impeller fins. Multiple variants of the Japanese CT20 turbine exist discretely, which are identified with the B, R, and A part number suffixes (eg.: CT20A).

if you can believe anything on wikipedia anyway, not claiming to be an supra expert, but those do seem to be enough to account for the difference


p.s. I dont believe the output of a lot of these engines is higher than claimed without dyno proof to back it up, sorry, I just have not been brainwashed by the "japaneese engines are better than everyone else" hype that seems to have gripped the world
 
R

rebel65

Member
Feb 1, 2004
363
0
17
SF Bay Area
Oct 31, 2009
#18
  • Oct 31, 2009
  • #18
that's not what he's saying. he said he would rather see ford in there, just that the 280 is low, they say everything is 280 just like ford wasn't allowed to have Speedo markers past whatever MPH but they put notches without speeds just for us.
 

gowest

Member
Dec 22, 2004
38
0
7
Bangkok, Thailand
Nov 1, 2009
#19
  • Nov 1, 2009
  • #19
The main reason for this 2JZ swap is a budget.
Ford V8 part and drivetrain is very hard to find or very expensive here.
You can buy 2JZ engine + drivetrain and suspension for less than T5 transmission would cost.

This is some pic of the rear IRS set up.

As for what kind of power this engine now make? If you notice this engine has a medium size single turbo instead of stock twin turbo set up, it should make about 500hp.



 

wicked93gs

15 Year Member
Sep 30, 2006
1,198
228
93
Nashville TN
Nov 1, 2009
#20
  • Nov 1, 2009
  • #20
Oh I know...but what about the aussie stuff? it should be almost as readily available as the japaneese stuff I would think...what IRS is that by the way? Supra as well?
 
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
1 of 3 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

W
New here, 1967 getting an efi 348 stroker.
  • Weeman348
  • Mar 27, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
159
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Mar 27, 2026
Weeman348
W
C
SN95 Another Coyote swap list
  • catkiller
  • May 10, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
136
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 10, 2026
catkiller
C
J
Mustang 1968 coupé restoration hvac
  • JackStang68
  • Mar 3, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
148
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Mar 27, 2026
zookeeper
P
Looking for others who swapped in a 4.6L engine
  • PeteFL
  • Jan 15, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
528
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jan 17, 2025
LILCBRA
J
1996 v6-v8 swap
  • jujuonurmom
  • Oct 28, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
200
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Oct 28, 2025
jujuonurmom
J
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?