• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

'69 351W Header Advice??

  • Thread starter Thread starter candy-a-Mach1
  • Start date Start date Mar 8, 2004
C

candy-a-Mach1

New Member
Nov 13, 2002
291
0
0
Kentucky
Mar 8, 2004
#1
  • Mar 8, 2004
  • #1
It's about time to drop in the motor, and I really don't want to take a sledge hammer to any new headers. Good or bad experiences would be appreciated.
I've got a 1969 Mach 1, with original 351W block, Trick Flow Twisted Wedge heads and Stealth intake. C4 Tranny, PS, PB, AC, Shelby drop and 620 springs on front, mid-eye's on the back. I noticed that there doesn't appear to be much difference between Hooker Competition and Super Comp's (Except Price). Super Comps have 1-5/8" x 28" long tubes feeding into 3" x 8" collector, and Competetion have 1-5/8" x 27" long tubes feeding into 3" x 8" collector for $200 less. I've heard of some fitment problems with Super Comp's. I'm not opposed to shorties.

Any advice is welcome.
 

xoxbxfx

Founding Member
May 9, 2001
3,959
0
0
Southlake, TX
Mar 8, 2004
#2
  • Mar 8, 2004
  • #2
I think you have it backwards... With my Hooker Comps, they were beaten a bit around the sparkplugs to make it fit... other than that they fit just fine. The supercomps are supposed to fit even easier because on one side, there is a tube that slips off and on. I would look into the 1 3/4" headers. Also, check into ceramic coating, its cheaper to get them done now and not worry later.
 
B

bnickel

Founding Member
Aug 21, 2002
5,640
3
77
lubbock, texas
Mar 9, 2004
#3
  • Mar 9, 2004
  • #3
i have hedman shorties and realy like them a lot, i did have to bang some of the tubes a bit to get the bolts in, but it was pretty minor, i understand that on the newest versions that isn't a problem anymore, best $99 bucks i ever spent and i'd buy 'em again too
 

jikelly

20+ Year Stangneter
Jul 9, 2003
872
53
99
Lubbock Tx
Mar 9, 2004
#4
  • Mar 9, 2004
  • #4
I like the hedman shorties too. The set I got has no clearance problems (of course I have a 73) and I didn't have to beat the crap out of it to get my header bolts in.
 

mrfomoco

New Member
Apr 18, 2004
108
0
0
The Woodlands, Texas
Apr 18, 2004
#5
  • Apr 18, 2004
  • #5
xoxbxfx said:
I think you have it backwards... With my Hooker Comps, they were beaten a bit around the sparkplugs to make it fit... other than that they fit just fine. The supercomps are supposed to fit even easier because on one side, there is a tube that slips off and on. I would look into the 1 3/4" headers. Also, check into ceramic coating, its cheaper to get them done now and not worry later.
Click to expand...
Which hooker comps do you have? A part number would be great.

-JM
 

jasonn

Founding Member
Sep 26, 2002
316
0
16
By Rochester MN
Apr 19, 2004
#6
  • Apr 19, 2004
  • #6
I have a 70 mach with a windsor. I called around to find headers a couple of years ago and talked with many companies. I even did the "can I talk to your boss and your boss etc." You would never believe what most companies told me why they listed headers for 69 to 70 mustangs with 302's and clevelands but not specifically for a 351w. They said they never came with windsors, only clevelands!! And this is from all of their so called "in house experts". Couldn't beleave it! And you sure can't argue with their "experts" I finally tried the ones from hedman. They are the elite series with the coating on them already that are the 1 5/8. I have a c4 in right now and they fit pretty good with no smashing. They list them like for 260-351w. OH, does anybody know of 1 3/4 headers for these??
 

mrfomoco

New Member
Apr 18, 2004
108
0
0
The Woodlands, Texas
Apr 19, 2004
#7
  • Apr 19, 2004
  • #7
When your sig says basically stock 351w and you ran a mid 12, im curious what is basically not stock about your motor. On my basically stock motor and a t-5 I was running mid 14's.
 

Edbert

Founding Member
Jul 13, 2002
3,548
32
109
Austin TX
Apr 19, 2004
#8
  • Apr 19, 2004
  • #8
mrfomoco said:
When your sig says basically stock 351w and you ran a mid 12, im curious what is basically not stock about your motor. On my basically stock motor and a t-5 I was running mid 14's.
Click to expand...
Around here they call that "sandbagging", kinda like my 420fwhp 351W having a 289 sticker on the air cleaner
 

mrfomoco

New Member
Apr 18, 2004
108
0
0
The Woodlands, Texas
Apr 19, 2004
#9
  • Apr 19, 2004
  • #9
ha ha - it'd be nice for the list of parts he has for those of us who would like to do a similar setup. I think everyone likes to hide what they have a little bit, but around here we are all in the same boat, nobody is competing, we're not at the strip. Here we're talking about whats in our cars, not hiding it.
 

jasonn

Founding Member
Sep 26, 2002
316
0
16
By Rochester MN
Apr 20, 2004
#10
  • Apr 20, 2004
  • #10
Edbert said:
Around here they call that "sandbagging", kinda like my 420fwhp 351W having a 289 sticker on the air cleaner
Click to expand...

No not really. I just like reading the posts, not having to keep paging down past all of these 3 page sigs. If I want to know about someones setup I just ask. They are usually more than willing to share information, as I am. My setup? All the basics are stock. Block, crank, rods, pistons, original heads. Just the basic bolt ons. Perf rpm with 750 holley. the headers and a mild ultradyne cam. And I did some head work back when I was 17. Had 1.9 1.6 valves put in and I ported them out myself. Nothing fancy or expensive in the motor. Stock rebuilt c4 with cheap 3000 ger converter and 4.11's. Ran 12.65 with 3.70's. I love racing all of my cheby buddies that have 11. to 1 'd, aluminum headed, huge cammed, high dollared motors and tranny's! Although that fun is over. New block is coming home from machinest thurs. New 408 with vic jr heads. Now it's time to start sandbagging! By the way, like I asked before, anybody know who makes 1 3/4 headers for 69 and 70's??
 

mrfomoco

New Member
Apr 18, 2004
108
0
0
The Woodlands, Texas
Apr 20, 2004
#11
  • Apr 20, 2004
  • #11
Thats really respectable man. Right now I'm in the process of porting and polishing my stock heads, and as soon as I finish with this they are going to the machine shop to be cut for 1.94's and 1.60's along with a 3 angle valve job and being set up for roller rockers. Who made the stroker kit for your motor? I was about to order a 418 kit but www.fordmuscle.com made me skeptic of rod ratio's. Now i'm leaning towards a 372 or a 383. Thanks for your input.

-JM
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Exhaust 1 3/4” Long Tubes on a Fox Body AOD – Easiest route?
  • 5.0 Mike
  • Mar 19, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 21, 2025
5.0 Mike
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
704
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Saturday at 9:06 AM
gray owl
G
A
SOLD For Sale: 1993 Ford Mustang Cobra Modified
  • anjteal93
  • Sep 5, 2025
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
13
Views
1K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Oct 26, 2025
Mindseye007
A
1990 Ford Mustang GT catalytic convertor
  • ar_legend
  • Jul 17, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
838
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 18, 2024
AeroCoupe
Intended Headers and Trans, questions about fitment
  • from6to8
  • Aug 6, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
22
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 6, 2025
from6to8
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?