• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

69' Mach 1 428 power?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 1973mach1
  • Start date Start date Sep 13, 2004
1

1973mach1

Member
May 19, 2003
457
0
16
PA
Sep 13, 2004
#1
  • Sep 13, 2004
  • #1
Could anyone tell me how the power on these cars was stock? I might be purchasing one.

Thanks,
Jim
 
D

Denny Wiedman

Founding Member
May 19, 2002
110
0
0
nj
Sep 13, 2004
#2
  • Sep 13, 2004
  • #2
428

they should run 14 or so, i seen one this weekend running 12.3 4-speed car not stock, i love the cj cars wish i had one, mine is a 351w car now 408, but always liked the big blocks.
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Sep 13, 2004
#3
  • Sep 13, 2004
  • #3
They were rated at 335 hp from the factory , but the actual power was closer to 400 . The std 428 pass car motor was rated at 345 hp....... so it's obvious the CJ rating was fudged........
 

SadbutTrue

Founding Member
May 1, 2002
2,390
4
49
Granada Hills, California
Sep 13, 2004
#4
  • Sep 13, 2004
  • #4
i believe Mustang Monthly dynoed one on a modern (SAE net) dyno and got 274rwhp from it. This means 320 hp at the flywheel is probably what you're looking at. Torqe was up in the mid 300s I believe, too. All of this might sound somewhat disappointing given its original rating, but in all honestly, its actually very impressive. One of the fastest cars of its day. With all that torque, it will certainly shove you back in the seat with authority.

In SAE gross terms, yes, 400 was more accurate. But theres a reason they got rid of SAE gross lol.
 
S

Sicarius428

Active Member
Jan 6, 2004
2,085
5
49
Sep 13, 2004
#5
  • Sep 13, 2004
  • #5
Stock its about 412 HP and 444 FT lbs torque. Runs a 13.6-13.8 quarter mile. With some less restrictive headers and exhaust you can make those big ports breathe and get some free... sort of... HP.
Kevin
 

SadbutTrue

Founding Member
May 1, 2002
2,390
4
49
Granada Hills, California
Sep 14, 2004
#6
  • Sep 14, 2004
  • #6
i really, really don't think you're going to get 412 HP out of a stock 428 unless you're counting in SAE gross... and we really, really, shouldn't use that, its very deceptive
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Sep 14, 2004
#7
  • Sep 14, 2004
  • #7
What's deceptive about it ? It's the same thing you'll see when you bolt the motor on an engine dyno.
 

chepsk8

Founding Member
Jan 15, 2001
2,203
3
49
Easton, PA
Sep 14, 2004
#8
  • Sep 14, 2004
  • #8
As an Ex-Owner, and having run the car many times for magazines, I can answer you pretty good. Bone Stock with bad tires, good luck in hooking it up. Good tires, low 14's. My SCj with 3.91's, headers, 750 carb, and electronic ignition with BFG radials ran 13.8's for two magazines. Hardest problem was launching the car! Had to "granny" it off the line, then stood on it! Through the traps at the top of third gear, Motor screaming, what a ride!!!!

Watch Hemmings Mustang Mag for an upcomming article about my open-track adventures with the car.

Now it sits in Las Vegas, in my X's garage, collecting dust......
 

ratio411

Founding Member
Apr 21, 2002
3,870
73
109
Pensacola FL
Sep 14, 2004
#9
  • Sep 14, 2004
  • #9
428CJs are not known for astronomical HP numbers.
What they do well is torque.

Very, very quick 428 cars will dyno deceptively low on hp, but through the roof on torque compared to another engine around the same cubes.
Dave
 

SadbutTrue

Founding Member
May 1, 2002
2,390
4
49
Granada Hills, California
Sep 15, 2004
#10
  • Sep 15, 2004
  • #10
if you take it to the dyno, the same one they measure modern cars on, it will not read 410 hp. A Corvette z06 has 400 hp, and it will read so on a dyno. The 428 will not. (for reference, the z06 would probably be at around 475-500 hp stock if measured on an SAE gross dyno... i just try to make sure everyone compares cars on an even measure, and a lot of people don't understand that a 300 hp car in 1969 isn't the same thing as a 300 hp car now... its a pet peeve i guess)

The 428 is extremely torquey, and if you can hook it up that is a big advantage over comparably powered cars.
 

Max Power

Active Member
Jul 31, 2003
1,774
1
36
St Paul
Sep 15, 2004
#11
  • Sep 15, 2004
  • #11
Pure horsepower is not the only reason to buy these cars. There will always be someone faster.

They are a hoot to drive and are going up in value like crazy. I wish I had mine back.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Old guy from San Diego
  • 9T02R
  • Jul 24, 2025
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
11
Views
336
The Welcome Wagon Jul 25, 2025
9T02R
J
2003 Mach 1 Wiring
  • JohnnyUtah
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
92
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Mar 23, 2026
squeak93
5
Hello fellow Mustang fanatics.
  • 580HP*428Cj
  • Apr 2, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
2
Views
190
The Welcome Wagon Apr 2, 2026
General karthief
G
Electrical Getting good ground in 1991 Fox Vert for amps - getting popping noise when I turn on the lights?
  • gvanginkel403
  • Apr 11, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
19
Views
393
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 5, 2026
Noobz347
G
79 steering rack problems
  • garyrc
  • Mar 8, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
127
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 8, 2026
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?