• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

70mm MAF causing backfire and Pop

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mackin1t
  • Start date Start date Jun 28, 2007
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
M

Mackin1t

New Member
Jan 2, 2003
5
0
0
Massachusetts
Jun 28, 2007
#1
  • Jun 28, 2007
  • #1
I bought a used 70mm MAF off of a 94 GT. The MAF was put in to my 93 LX 5.0 - I took it out for a ride after and it was very smooth through first gear driving slow but once I got out of the parking lot and went WOT, the car would bog then a LOUD pop comes from the passenger side of the car. I am sure it is the MAF that is causing the problem, just wondering how to reconcile the problem.

Any ideas? Thanks
 
2

2002BLGT

Well-Known Member
Dec 18, 2003
2,945
4
59
Bedford VA
Jun 28, 2007
#2
  • Jun 28, 2007
  • #2
Mackin1t said:
I bought a used 70mm MAF off of a 94 GT. The MAF was put in to my 93 LX 5.0 - I took it out for a ride after and it was very smooth through first gear driving slow but once I got out of the parking lot and went WOT, the car would bog then a LOUD pop comes from the passenger side of the car. I am sure it is the MAF that is causing the problem, just wondering how to reconcile the problem.

Any ideas? Thanks
Click to expand...

put the stock MAF back on , or get one that is designed to work on your car , C&L 73MM is a good upgrade for a stock car
 

vristang

15 Year Member
Mar 31, 2005
4,933
101
124
Seattle
Jun 28, 2007
#3
  • Jun 28, 2007
  • #3
Pulled codes????

Not sure what else it could be other than you bought a defective MAF.

What sensor is on the MAF tube?


jason
 
M

Mackin1t

New Member
Jan 2, 2003
5
0
0
Massachusetts
Jun 28, 2007
#4
  • Jun 28, 2007
  • #4
it's the sensor that came stock on the 94GT on the 70mm MAF

so basically if it weren't defective, I could have just bolted it up and it would have worked without issue?
 

jrichker

StangNet's favorite TOOL
In Remembrance. Thank you for your contributions
Mar 10, 2000
27,512
2,811
234
Dublin GA
Jun 28, 2007
#5
  • Jun 28, 2007
  • #5
It works that way for me. See http://forums.stangnet.com/showthread.php?t=616246 for input form other guys who tried it.

I am assuming you are still using the stock air box and a stock filter or K&N flat panel filter.

Dump the codes and see what the computer says is wrong…Codes may be present in the computer even if the Check Engine light isn’t on.

Here's the link to dump the computer codes with only a jumper wire or paper clip and the check engine light, or test light or voltmeter. I’ve used it for years, and it works great.

See http://www.troublecodes.net/Ford/







IF your car is an 86-88 stang, you'll have to use the test lamp or voltmeter method. There is no functional check engine light on the 86-88's except possibly the Cali Mass Air cars.

Codes have different answers if the engine is running from the answers that it has when the engine isn't running. It helps a lot to know if you had the engine running when you ran the test.

Trouble codes are either 2 digit or 3 digit, there are no cars that use both 2 digit codes and 3 digit codes.

For those who are intimidated by all the wires & connections, see http://www.actron.com/product_detail.php?pid=16153 for what a typical hand scanner looks like. Normal retail price is about $30 or so at AutoZone or Wal-Mart.

Or for a nicer scanner see http://www.midwayautosupply.com/pc-7208-90-equus-digital-ford-code-reader-3145.aspx – It has a 3 digit LCD display so that you don’t have to count flashes or beeps.. Cost is $30.
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
33
129
Jun 28, 2007
#6
  • Jun 28, 2007
  • #6
Also, simply recheck the plumbing connections.

I suppose you could fart around with blowing through your tube and noting voltage changes in the signal wire reading.

No air filter bolted to the end of the MAF, right?

Good luck.
 

mantix33

New Member
Apr 9, 2005
26
0
1
North Canton, OH
Jun 28, 2007
#7
  • Jun 28, 2007
  • #7
id also recommend trying to clean it, just shoot a little carb cleaner at it real quick
 

vristang

15 Year Member
Mar 31, 2005
4,933
101
124
Seattle
Jun 28, 2007
#8
  • Jun 28, 2007
  • #8
Mackin1t said:
it's the sensor that came stock on the 94GT on the 70mm MAF
Click to expand...
There should be an F2VF in the part number...


This meter works very well on most Fox ecu's

What ecu are you using?
 
M

Mackin1t

New Member
Jan 2, 2003
5
0
0
Massachusetts
Jun 30, 2007
#9
  • Jun 30, 2007
  • #9
That is the part number on the top of the MAF and I am using a stock computer with a basically stock mustang. So most likely a bad MAF right?

How expensive it is to just replace the meter because I had the square end machined to a circle so that it would fit with my CAI. Thanks for all your help guys
 

montegoman351

Member
Jan 12, 2007
169
1
18
Jun 30, 2007
#10
  • Jun 30, 2007
  • #10
Mackin1t said:
How expensive it is to just replace the meter because I had the square end machined to a circle so that it would fit with my CAI. Thanks for all your help guys
Click to expand...

Whaaaaat? You had the square end machined to fit the CAI? To fit the filter or the CAI tube? If it was to fit the CAI tube, then you gots it backerds!
 

vristang

15 Year Member
Mar 31, 2005
4,933
101
124
Seattle
Jul 1, 2007
#11
  • Jul 1, 2007
  • #11
Mackin1t said:
That is the part number on the top of the MAF and I am using a stock computer with a basically stock mustang. So most likely a bad MAF right?

How expensive it is to just replace the meter because I had the square end machined to a circle so that it would fit with my CAI. Thanks for all your help guys
Click to expand...
I realize that you don't want to pull the ecu out, but it would be nice to double check. A previous owner may have done something odd, you never know...


Regardless...
You should pull the diagnostic codes before you go any further.
I'm not trying to be rude, but this has been suggested several times in this thread... and for good reason.
Pulling the codes is a crucial step in finding the source of a problem.


Wouldn't it suck to spend the $$$ on a new MAS, just to have the problem continue?
Pulling codes can help prevent that.


Let us know what you get,
jason
 
C

chowbrow

New Member
Jul 1, 2007
2
0
1
Pitt Meadows BC, Can
Jul 2, 2007
#12
  • Jul 2, 2007
  • #12
Hey ...I too have run into idle problems, flat and missing during acceleration... I ran my ECU for codes and came back 11 KOEO.. ran the running car came back with 92,, too rich. I then thought my 73mm C&L was crap and thought the sample tube might be wrecked too... I checked and cleaned everything and it still idled bad and ran even worse .. popping etc. I solved the problem with and adjustable IAS motor spacer part # (F2PZ-9F939-A)... It was expensive at $35.00 and solved all my drivability problems. It took 5 minutes to install. Just a thought before you go hog wild. But again check all your codes first.
 

Mr. Rustypwnz

Advanced Member
Jun 1, 2005
1,761
63
69
indianapolis/ valdosta ga
Jul 2, 2007
#13
  • Jul 2, 2007
  • #13
its bad, ive had 4 of these sensors, when one goes bad it does this, do this for me: take the sensor off your old maf: the stock 55mm unit, and put it on the newer 70mm piece, it works great!! ive done it three times, no ill effects.
 

vristang

15 Year Member
Mar 31, 2005
4,933
101
124
Seattle
Jul 2, 2007
#14
  • Jul 2, 2007
  • #14
slow95gt said:
its bad, ive had 4 of these sensors, when one goes bad it does this, do this for me: take the sensor off your old maf: the stock 55mm unit, and put it on the newer 70mm piece, it works great!! ive done it three times, no ill effects.
Click to expand...

I cannot emphasize how BAD of an idea this is


Unless you have datalogs of AFR and/or KAMRF's, then you have no business saying how great it works...


Please... do not do this...




jason
 

93tealstang

Founding Member
Jan 24, 2002
1,242
1
39
McSherrystown/Hanover Pennsylvania
Jul 2, 2007
#15
  • Jul 2, 2007
  • #15
I don't know if this has been brought up yet or not, but maybe try disconnecting the battery to reset the computer? When I put my 70mm on, it ran rough because I forgot to reset the computer. After resetting, it works great.
 

Mr. Rustypwnz

Advanced Member
Jun 1, 2005
1,761
63
69
indianapolis/ valdosta ga
Jul 2, 2007
#16
  • Jul 2, 2007
  • #16
I cannot emphasize how BAD of an idea this is


Unless you have datalogs of AFR and/or KAMRF's, then you have no business saying how great it works...


Please... do not do this...




jason
Click to expand...

believe me I thought it was stupid as well, look at both of the meters, you will find that they both have the same sample tube size, as long as the sample tube is the same, the computer thinks its running right. Ive had mine like this for 3 months no ill effects, shifting a 6k when the need comes, ive tried this on 3 cars so far, cauleys 89gt, my 86gt, full h/c/i to boot! and my 90 lx 5.0. Ill get a vid up soon of it, to prove this, but all in all it works hands down, and my a/f meter stayed the same as well, so it works for me.
 

Mr. Rustypwnz

Advanced Member
Jun 1, 2005
1,761
63
69
indianapolis/ valdosta ga
Jul 2, 2007
#17
  • Jul 2, 2007
  • #17


look at this closely, this is the 94-95 meter, the only thing that is different is that the hole is bigger not the sample tube, the meter compensates for the extra air, it would be like if you cut out a stock 55mm to a 70, with the stock sample tube, up top it still reads the computer fine and is calibrated for stock 19's, so it works fine, thats all I know about it, but it works, runs fine, idles great. if anybody has a stock meter and a 70mm lying around, just swap the meter's and go drive it, what is amazing is it drives competely the same.
 

vristang

15 Year Member
Mar 31, 2005
4,933
101
124
Seattle
Jul 2, 2007
#18
  • Jul 2, 2007
  • #18
slow95gt said:
believe me I thought it was stupid as well, look at both of the meters, you will find that they both have the same sample tube size, as long as the sample tube is the same, the computer thinks its running right. Ive had mine like this for 3 months no ill effects, shifting a 6k when the need comes, ive tried this on 3 cars so far, cauleys 89gt, my 86gt, full h/c/i to boot! and my 90 lx 5.0. Ill get a vid up soon of it, to prove this, but all in all it works hands down, and my a/f meter stayed the same as well, so it works for me.
Click to expand...
You can't tell crap by looking at the externals of an electronics black box!!!
(unless you want to talk part numbers... Ford changed part numbers for a reason... )

Sample tube????
What meter are we talking about here???
Ford did not EVER use a sample tube....

What you are proposing is pretty risky.

I encourage anyone following along in this thread to proceed with great caution.
Mixing and matching the MAS to MAF tubes is not recommended!!!!!

Again,
Datalogs...
I don't care about your 'vids' or even what your dash mounted afr gauge seems to 'show'

Datalog, both before and after, using a WB O2...
Until then, it is just theory...

jason
 

vristang

15 Year Member
Mar 31, 2005
4,933
101
124
Seattle
Jul 3, 2007
#19
  • Jul 3, 2007
  • #19
slow95gt said:
Click to expand...

Please elaborate on your point...

I am trying real hard to hear you out, and not be a smart @$$, but it isn't easy at this point.
Please don't get offended, but honestly... I'm not buying it...



jason
 

Mr. Rustypwnz

Advanced Member
Jun 1, 2005
1,761
63
69
indianapolis/ valdosta ga
Jul 3, 2007
#20
  • Jul 3, 2007
  • #20
I know your not, lol. The part im talking about would be A in the diagram, this is what I call the sample tube, correct me if im wrong though... both the stock maf and the 94-95 piece have the same size tube,
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

M
Engine Unexplainable Exhaust Pop and Gurgle
  • Mrnissen122
  • Feb 14, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
12
Views
481
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 18, 2026
Noobz347
1
Engine 91 mustang 302 Low acceleration car backfires pops and acts like it doesn’t want to take fuel
  • 1991Fox5.0
  • Oct 4, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
16
Views
949
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Oct 6, 2025
1991Fox5.0
1
S
Engine Stalls when downshifting/coasting
  • Scott_S
  • Nov 5, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
11
Views
649
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 6, 2025
Mustang5L5
S
Fuel ‘88 GT Runs Rich Cold — Fixes Itself When I Unplug Sensors (ECT, MAF, O2, etc.)
  • Sufarry
  • Nov 6, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
12
Views
738
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 9, 2025
Mustang5L5
Engine 1990 LX 5.0L EFI Mustang Fuel Management Problems - HELP!
  • 5.0LXStanger
  • May 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
45
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 11, 2025
5.0LXStanger
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?