• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

86 Grand Marquis 5.0 Roller Motor HO or Not HO??

  • Thread starter Thread starter irhino2
  • Start date Start date Mar 8, 2010
I

irhino2

New Member
Mar 8, 2010
1
0
0
Mar 8, 2010
#1
  • Mar 8, 2010
  • #1
I just purchased a 5.0 roller motor out of an 86 Grand Marquis. I am putting this motor into a 95 Mustang GT. I need some information on the motor. What 302 options were there for the grand Marquis in 86. Was the roller version an HO?
I am putting this into a 95 mustang with the computer for an HO motor. If the 86 Grand Marquis roller motor is an HO then I won't have to change the cam, but if it's just a roller 302 I will need to change the cam to fit the Mustang HO firing pattern.

Could you please give me information on this so I know what the next step will be in my motor swap.
Thanks
 

Adam95GT

New Member
Aug 14, 2006
2,564
3
0
Burlington, NJ
Mar 8, 2010
#2
  • Mar 8, 2010
  • #2
irhino2 said:
I just purchased a 5.0 roller motor out of an 86 Grand Marquis. I am putting this motor into a 95 Mustang GT. I need some information on the motor. What 302 options were there for the grand Marquis in 86. Was the roller version an HO?
I am putting this into a 95 mustang with the computer for an HO motor. If the 86 Grand Marquis roller motor is an HO then I won't have to change the cam, but if it's just a roller 302 I will need to change the cam to fit the Mustang HO firing pattern.

Could you please give me information on this so I know what the next step will be in my motor swap.
Thanks
Click to expand...


non ho... pretty sure, not even sure if it has the e7 heads think they didnt get going till 87 my memory could be a mess though... Think the 86 had e6's and im not sure if the pistons have valve reliefs
 

cjrpony

Member
Jan 23, 2010
439
0
17
West Michigan
Mar 9, 2010
#3
  • Mar 9, 2010
  • #3
Adam95GT said:
non ho... pretty sure not even sure if it has the e7 heads think they didnt get going till 87 my memory could be a mess though... Think the 86 had e6's and im not sure if the pistons have valve reliefs
Click to expand...

Definitely not HO, pretty sure no piston reliefs. Upper intake manifold is not HO either.
 

divit250r

Member
Mar 31, 2005
314
0
16
Columbia City, IN
Mar 10, 2010
#4
  • Mar 10, 2010
  • #4
cjrpony said:
Definitely not HO, pretty sure no piston reliefs. Upper intake manifold is not HO either.
Click to expand...

I had an 88 Cougar with a 5.0. It was a roller cam, non-HO engine. Lower compression (around 8.0 I think), different firing order, cast iron manifolds instead of headers, etc... The only difference on the upper intake was the name plate on top. Two torx drive screws and that's done. The biggest problem was the weak cam and low compression, IMO.

Scott
 

cjrpony

Member
Jan 23, 2010
439
0
17
West Michigan
Mar 10, 2010
#5
  • Mar 10, 2010
  • #5
I don't know this for 100% sure but I believe there was a difference between HO and non HO upper intakes. Not visually but internally. The HO uppers supposedly flow slightly better and have "HO" cast on the manifold under the plaque. The lower intake were all the same though. Does anyone else know if this is true? I have a couple of stock uppers in my garage, one has the HO mark on it and one doesn't.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

D
Engine HO cam in non HO roller block ‘93 f150
  • DanC1993f150
  • Mar 21, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
345
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 29, 2026
General karthief
SOLD Sold.
  • TTSaleen
  • Jul 1, 2026
  • Engine and Power Adder
Replies
6
Views
334
Engine and Power Adder Jul 2, 2026
Noobz347
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
981
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
H
Ongoing Battle With Hydraulic Lifters
  • hailer06
  • Jun 8, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
327
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 9, 2026
Noobz347
Oil choice for after break in period.
  • Sask84gt
  • Feb 28, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
26
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 14, 2026
Praetorious
P
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?