• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

86 heads E6SE

  • Thread starter Thread starter mnbf
  • Start date Start date Sep 14, 2004
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
M

mnbf

Member
Aug 14, 2003
207
0
16
Canada,Saskatoon
Sep 14, 2004
#1
  • Sep 14, 2004
  • #1
Kinda new to the whole 5.0 thing but i was just wondering if there is away to
rework \ grind the E6SE heads so they dont have the heart shape and so they would flow better.. any input would be good
p.s. i know there garbage but im not spending money on heads and i got these free so yea....
p.s.s. im makeing a motor to go in my moms 77 mustang so im not trying to make a drag car lol thanks for input
 
R

Ronstang

New Member
Apr 4, 2004
1,294
0
0
Houston Texas
Sep 14, 2004
#2
  • Sep 14, 2004
  • #2
It wouldn't be worth the effort or expense. Use them for trot line weights because that is all they are good for, unless you need a heavy duty doorstop.
 

LMan

Founding Member
Aug 10, 2002
1,246
0
0
Mom's basement
Sep 14, 2004
#3
  • Sep 14, 2004
  • #3
if its your mom's car, dont do anything....put em on.....
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Sep 14, 2004
#4
  • Sep 14, 2004
  • #4
Don't remove anything other than the sharp edges, those E6SE chambers are actually larger than the better ( for HP production) E7TE heads. They cc out at about 68 cc's, the E7's are 64 cc. The E6's make excellant bottom end torque, better than the E7's but are about 25 hp shorter than the E7's on top.
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Sep 14, 2004
#5
  • Sep 14, 2004
  • #5
Ronstang said:
It wouldn't be worth the effort or expense. Use them for trot line weights because that is all they are good for, unless you need a heavy duty doorstop.
Click to expand...
You really think that Canuck has any idea what a "trot line " is I doubt he's spent any amount of time in deep east Texas.
 

ashford

Member
Dec 19, 2003
485
0
16
fargo ND
Sep 14, 2004
#6
  • Sep 14, 2004
  • #6
actually if your not planning to use much rpm after 4500 they are probably the best head you can get. i had a set on my fox body then upgraded to lightly ported early 289 heads. i lost so much torque at lower rpms it made me sad. the ported heads didnt overcome them till about 4000rpm on an e303 cam.
as for tuning them up all you really need to do is unshroud the intake valves a bit, remove sharp edges from the combustion chamber(keep in mind not to go past the head gasket surface) radius the bowls and radius the pushrod bumps some with a dremel.
 
M

mnbf

Member
Aug 14, 2003
207
0
16
Canada,Saskatoon
Sep 14, 2004
#7
  • Sep 14, 2004
  • #7
other questions

witch cam \ intake would you reccomend.. just something cheap that works decent its a 77 block with the 86 heads
p.s. i heard u need special plugs for the E6SE heads
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Sep 14, 2004
#8
  • Sep 14, 2004
  • #8
What pistons are you running in the block? Dished or flat tops?
 
M

mnbf

Member
Aug 14, 2003
207
0
16
Canada,Saskatoon
Sep 14, 2004
#9
  • Sep 14, 2004
  • #9
stock?

Flat top
 

ashford

Member
Dec 19, 2003
485
0
16
fargo ND
Sep 15, 2004
#10
  • Sep 15, 2004
  • #10
for your mother a small compu-pro or rv cam and a performer or action plus intake
 

ashford

Member
Dec 19, 2003
485
0
16
fargo ND
Sep 15, 2004
#11
  • Sep 15, 2004
  • #11
D.Hearne said:
What pistons are you running in the block? Dished or flat tops?
Click to expand...
oh yeah forgot the stock pistons on an e6 engine have a very small dish with 0 deck height.
was it the 73-76 or something else that had the undesirable deck hiegth
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Sep 15, 2004
#12
  • Sep 15, 2004
  • #12
The pistons that came with E6SE heads, are true flat tops, with no valve reliefs, no dish either. The reason for that, is the valve seats are located about 1/8 higher above the deck than in other small block heads.So there's no chance of the valves hitting the pistons, unless you swap on any toher set of small block heads. The valve stems are shorter on the E6SE's, enabling Ford to still use the stock length pushrods . The 72-76 pistons have huge dishes in them, that's why I asked, you don't want to use the E6SE heads with them ( I wouldn't use them in any motor)
 
M

mnbf

Member
Aug 14, 2003
207
0
16
Canada,Saskatoon
Sep 15, 2004
#13
  • Sep 15, 2004
  • #13
D.Hearne said:
The 72-76 pistons have huge dishes in them, that's why I asked, you don't want to use the E6SE heads with them ( I wouldn't use them in any motor)
Click to expand...

what? they do have a huge dish? they look pretty flat to me besides the fact that they have 2 groves cut out from them
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Sep 15, 2004
#14
  • Sep 15, 2004
  • #14
I was talking about the 72-76 pistons, not the E6SE pistons
 
M

mnbf

Member
Aug 14, 2003
207
0
16
Canada,Saskatoon
Sep 15, 2004
#15
  • Sep 15, 2004
  • #15
umm

thats is what i was talking about i have a 74 block and a 77 block ( with a hole in it) and they he ther same pistions not dished.... so yea... maybe your thinking of 72-73 or maybe a mach 1 but im talking 74 and 77 mustang II you know the ugly ones
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Sep 15, 2004
#16
  • Sep 15, 2004
  • #16
If they don't have the dished pistons, it's entirely possible that they've be changed in the last 30 years. Ford dished the 302 pistons to lower the comp ratio in 72 , then in 77 or 78, they went to flattops, and the huge chambered D8OE heads, so the comp ratio stayed the same. As I recall those 72-77 pistons had about A 1/4" deep dish in them. Ditto for the 351W's too.
 
M

mnbf

Member
Aug 14, 2003
207
0
16
Canada,Saskatoon
Sep 15, 2004
#17
  • Sep 15, 2004
  • #17
so...

Well sense there not dished pistons would that mean they would be ok to work with the E6Se heads? even know i know the heads suck
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Sep 15, 2004
#18
  • Sep 15, 2004
  • #18
It would be better to use those heads with the flat tops, after all that's what Ford used with them, although they didn't use valve reliefs. The dished ones would lower the comp ratio too much.
 
M

mnbf

Member
Aug 14, 2003
207
0
16
Canada,Saskatoon
Sep 15, 2004
#19
  • Sep 15, 2004
  • #19
soo...

The pistons i have are flot top with little half circles in them... thoses would work good for these heads then?
 
R

Ronstang

New Member
Apr 4, 2004
1,294
0
0
Houston Texas
Sep 15, 2004
#20
  • Sep 15, 2004
  • #20
Yes
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
665
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 28, 2026
Noobz347
0
V6 to V8 Swap info
  • 02_2v_Curtis
  • Jan 11, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
564
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jan 11, 2026
02_2v_Curtis
0
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
Wheels-Tires LS mii swap and rear rim size/axle questions....
  • 78mIIman
  • Feb 2, 2025
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
6
Views
682
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech May 6, 2025
78 Mach1
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
45
Views
2K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 4, 2026
nickyb
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?