• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

92 gt bolt on horsepower to the wheels?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jvshouse
  • Start date Start date Apr 9, 2018
J

Jvshouse

New Member
Mar 27, 2018
27
0
1
Apr 9, 2018
#1
  • Apr 9, 2018
  • #1
I bought a 92 gt 5speed with 3.08 gears. Im just wondering if anyone could guess the power to the wheels and torque. This is what i know it has. Cobra intake, msd distributor, shorty headers with flowmaster force ll, cai with mass flow still for 19lb injectors, underdrive pulleys, ac removed, aluminum driveshaft, 130 amp alternator, upgraded clutch id have to look through paperwork for the name and subframe connectors. Not sure if anything was changed internally. Seems quite fast but havent got a chance to play with anyone to compare. Alot faster then my 87 convertible was even with 3.73 gears and flowmasters. I think she was tired. Thanks. Closest dyno is 3hrs away so im just curious. Im not sure if the timing was played with but im loving it.thanks again
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,264
17,952
224
Massachusetts
Apr 9, 2018
#2
  • Apr 9, 2018
  • #2
10-15 more HP that stock
 
Reactions: General karthief

Dan02gt

mazing how much gas smell came from that tiny hole
20+ Year Stangneter
Mar 2, 2003
909
415
113
Greenville, NC
Apr 9, 2018
#3
  • Apr 9, 2018
  • #3
I would estimate 220-230 hp to the wheels.
 
C

Church401

Member
Mar 20, 2018
47
3
18
Apr 10, 2018
#4
  • Apr 10, 2018
  • #4
.........
 
C

Church401

Member
Mar 20, 2018
47
3
18
Apr 10, 2018
#5
  • Apr 10, 2018
  • #5
Gun to my head 175hp/240tq Realistically it’s a 25-year-old car so the engine is probably pretty worn. Then you have to account for 25% loss to the drivetrain which brings it to around 155 hp. Then if you put 13° of timing and basic bolt ons you would be round 175 wheel. Unfortunately it’s not an LS you can’t just bolt on horsepower. With a cam swap long tubes and a tune you can get around 400 wheel with an LS. If you reringed your block Swapped a GT 40 heads got a trick flow cam a long tubes you could probably get her onto 240 horse. Imo
 
Last edited: Apr 10, 2018

General karthief

wonder how much it would cost to ship you a pair
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 25, 2016
27,951
10,589
203
polk county florida
Apr 11, 2018
#6
  • Apr 11, 2018
  • #6
I hate it when people compare the sbf with the ls gm engine
sbf - 50 (+ ) year old design with several upgrades over the years and by 1992 Ford was all in on the modular design.
LS was probably being developed or maybe an actual working model in 1992 and is a 'clean sheet ' design, it doesn't even compare with the old sbc pushrod engine.
Compare it to chevys 60 (+) year old design and you get 210hp for the 350 and maybe 195hp for the 305 ci. If they were even still making the 305 in 92.
Now I'm not knocking the LS engine, it's a remarkable piece. And I'm not knocking you for your post but lets compare apples to apples.
 
Reactions: RangerJoe

cleanLX

Founding Member
Jan 17, 2001
976
537
144
Apr 11, 2018
#7
  • Apr 11, 2018
  • #7
It's very hard to guess...
back in the day, when these cars had 40k or less miles, that combo with an off-road H/X would put down 240hp/300tq on the high end of the spectrum... they usually had larger than stock fuel pump and a fair number of passes at the track dialing in fuel pressure/timing/plugs.
many were making around 220hp/290tq... while just as many were struggling at 200hp/275tq...
Add more confusion, some cars were just a little stronger from the factory than others, while some were a little weaker.
Most back in the day dyno'd 180/190hp at the wheels... some a little over 200hp... mine put down 218hp with nothing but a cheap H pipe.

So many factors on an older engine now... condition of sensors, condition of fuel pump, leaky/clogged injectors, gunked up intake/heads/pistons, tired rings/seal...
So to answer your question... somewhere between 175/240hp and 250/300tq.
 
Reactions: RangerJoe
C

Church401

Member
Mar 20, 2018
47
3
18
Apr 11, 2018
#8
  • Apr 11, 2018
  • #8
Also don’t forget the dyno type also , an awd dyno can put down terrible numbers compared to a mustang dyno. I’m sure sea level, humidity and temperature can have an effect also.
 
C

Church401

Member
Mar 20, 2018
47
3
18
Apr 11, 2018
#9
  • Apr 11, 2018
  • #9
....
 

cleanLX

Founding Member
Jan 17, 2001
976
537
144
Apr 11, 2018
#10
  • Apr 11, 2018
  • #10
if the dyno is software/hardware/sensors are setup correctly and functioning, it will spit out density altitude corrected numbers.
When you see these same cars at the track geared similarly and on slicks and skinnies with similar modifications running anywhere from 12.6's to 13.5's it tells the tale.
Yes, there are a lot of factors, but not enough to reason the seemingly ~70hp performance difference... some are just stronger, more pure, than others for a myrid of reasons.
 

BlakeusMaximus

Still got to try a little lube on my speedo head
5 Year Member
Jul 12, 2017
2,474
1,348
173
Apr 12, 2018
#11
  • Apr 12, 2018
  • #11
cleanLX said:
It's very hard to guess...
back in the day, when these cars had 40k or less miles, that combo with an off-road H/X would put down 240hp/300tq on the high end of the spectrum... they usually had larger than stock fuel pump and a fair number of passes at the track dialing in fuel pressure/timing/plugs.
many were making around 220hp/290tq... while just as many were struggling at 200hp/275tq...
Add more confusion, some cars were just a little stronger from the factory than others, while some were a little weaker.
Most back in the day dyno'd 180/190hp at the wheels... some a little over 200hp... mine put down 218hp with nothing but a cheap H pipe.

So many factors on an older engine now... condition of sensors, condition of fuel pump, leaky/clogged injectors, gunked up intake/heads/pistons, tired rings/seal...
So to answer your question... somewhere between 175/240hp and 250/300tq.
Click to expand...
Those cars that came out stronger/faster from the factory are called Wednesday cars. Nobody wants to work on Mondays and Fridays. Tues-Thurs cars were the ones to have.
 
Last edited: Apr 12, 2018
Reactions: Church401

FastDriver

I was uncomfortably high & wearing a helmet
SN Certified Technician
Sep 5, 2001
6,105
2,717
224
Vass, NC
Apr 12, 2018
#12
  • Apr 12, 2018
  • #12
intake: 10-15
shorties: 10-15
CAI: 5
UD pullies: 5-10
So, 30-45 rhwp, but they don't stack at the exact same RPM. So, I'd say 25-35 rwhp on top of stock, which is typically in the 190-200 rwhp range.

Thus:
215-235 rwhp.
 
J

Jvshouse

New Member
Mar 27, 2018
27
0
1
Apr 14, 2018
#13
  • Apr 14, 2018
  • #13
Thanks for all the answers guys.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

For Sale 3-owner 1987 Mustang GT, $18K obro, Lancaster CA
  • Bill Cool
  • Oct 6, 2024
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
4
Views
2K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Oct 13, 2024
nickyb
SOLD For Sale 92 Mustang Notchback Complete Rebuild in 2019
  • pearlnotchback
  • Jun 21, 2021
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
9
Views
4K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Jun 24, 2021
Steel1
T
What's it Worth? 1989 GT - What's it worth?
  • Tim83
  • May 11, 2021
  • What is it Worth?!?!?
Replies
2
Views
3K
What is it Worth?!?!? Jun 3, 2021
Mustang5L5
G
My new baby. 88 5.0 gt
  • Guccijayda
  • May 16, 2019
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
12
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 18, 2019
Guccijayda
G
G
New member. 1988 mustang GT.
  • Guccijayda
  • May 16, 2019
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
6
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 17, 2019
Guccijayda
G
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?