see mustangs just had them wrong from the begining should have been horizontal all along damn ford cant get anything right lol
Rice? WTF?!! I would call the fake hoodscoops rice before attacking tail lights.
And you'll find that anyone who actually knows what the rear of all Mustangs from '65-'73 look like will agree the the '96 has more in common with the first generation than the horizontals do.
I guess if I flipped a '67/'68 on its side, and beat tail light panel with a hammer it might look like a '94/'95.
Rice??? That's a bit much. If you wanna talk border-line rice, mention the newer Lightning or whatever that newer Ford sedan is called.
The 87-93 GT look like fine cheese graters, whereas the 94-95 will give you the large slices of cheese.
No point in insulting anyone.
The part that sticks out about the "classic" is the aggressive /// \\\ angles of the slots. That is sweet. So I'm still at the original debate.
Second, I said "borderline rice" as in they look like CHEAP made thin plastic. You make the very transparent red into a clear, stick some red bulbs in there, and bam they say APC all over them.
Which do I feel look better on MY car. 94-95 or 96-98. I chose the 94-95.... plain and simple.
Okay...I get it. My roommate used to think 3rd gen. Camaros looked good.
I stand corrected...
I got the angles backwards, but they do appeared to be angled none the less on this body style.
i love the long tail lights on that car so sexy....didn't they come from the t-bird..or something..i cant remember
That's just point of perspective. If you look at a '67/'68 taillight head-on(not lining up with the gas cap), you will see it's not slanted. It's just the concave shap that gives it that illusion.
Here again. This had nothing to do with Lightnings... or the fox body mustangs.
If you want to bring them into this. OUR generation of youngsters might consider the FOX body as THE mustang body style. IF so... then the horizontal cheese graters would be a "similar" match to our stock taillights. Just bigger slices of cheese.
The common thread was between rice and Lightning tails, not hard to follow. The other common thread was between the horizontal 94-95 tails and the 87-93 tails...again, not hard to follow.
I like both of them. But I think my 95 look's tuffer in the back compared to my 96. The 94-95's look bad a$$ at nite
Hey Grady, do you think there is a difference of opinion on what a mustang is... based on the age of the person you are asking?
Might be an interesting thread.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?