• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

95 Cobra Long-tubes??

  • Thread starter Thread starter flygilmore
  • Start date Start date Feb 15, 2006
F

flygilmore

New Member
Mar 31, 2005
33
0
0
Feb 15, 2006
#1
  • Feb 15, 2006
  • #1
I am changing some stuff on my 95 cobra getting ready for a custom tune/chip. Right now I have a Pro-M 80mm maf, powerpipe, 42lb inj. afpr, V1 s-trim 255 in tank. Exhaust: stock headers, MAC off road h pipe, American thunder cat 2.5 inch. Would Long tubes be worth my time and hassle (good hp gain) with my setup or if questionable, should I leave my exhaust alone. If I change headers, I want to do it right the first time-what brand would you reccomend?

thanks!
 
S

sage2k

Member
May 23, 2005
645
0
16
Baton Rouge, LA
Feb 15, 2006
#2
  • Feb 15, 2006
  • #2
i would imagine it would be quite nice gains with the long tubes, keep in mind tho that you would need a new h pipe made for long tubes
 

nmcgrawj

Advanced Member
Sep 28, 2003
3,651
4
68
Indianapolis, IN
Feb 15, 2006
#3
  • Feb 15, 2006
  • #3
I like BBK's one piece flange...but its all preferance. I've heard bad stories about MAC and BBK....i've had great luck with BBK. I loved the ceramic finish long tubes i had. Fit like a glove.
 
F

fiveo'cobra

New Member
Oct 7, 2004
241
0
0
SC
Feb 15, 2006
#4
  • Feb 15, 2006
  • #4
With a blower like that, you will see a HUGE increase in hp, especially in the top end. Above 4Krpm, you will be amazed at how hard its gonna pull. BBK longtubes are the way to go if you have a $400 budget on headers. Make sure you get ceramics. If you want REALLY nice headers, Hooker or Kooks are top notch, but are around $600. Also sell that o/r H pipe for an o/r X pipe. Since you are blown, an x-pipe will net you 5-10 more hp depending on how much boost you are running.
 

Kronos

New Member
Apr 4, 2005
101
0
0
the boondocks
Feb 15, 2006
#5
  • Feb 15, 2006
  • #5
i put my longtubes on and saw a huge gain and now they're off and and feel weak and powerless yet again.

Although this was on a 4.6 and with that s/c i know you won't feel weak or by any means powerless but you should see huge gains.
The install will suck though
 

95cobraguy

Member
Dec 23, 2005
637
11
19
Concord, NC by way of LI, NY
Feb 15, 2006
#6
  • Feb 15, 2006
  • #6
i have mac longtubes on my 95 cobra, they weren't ceramic coated though and they went to sh-t so i took em off and had a local guy over here ceramic coat them.
 

nmcgrawj

Advanced Member
Sep 28, 2003
3,651
4
68
Indianapolis, IN
Feb 15, 2006
#7
  • Feb 15, 2006
  • #7
fiveo'cobra said:
Also sell that o/r H pipe for an o/r X pipe. Since you are blown, an x-pipe will net you 5-10 more hp depending on how much boost you are running.
Click to expand...


Eh...is this something you tested and found yourself? Or is this just something that was "passed" down?


Im asking you cause George Klass at Accufab has done tests between h and x pipes...the result? He still sticks to h's. A lot of it goes into the design of the x...as some actually hurt you.

I guess im just saying that info like this isnt always the best for someone...i still think mufflers and midpipes should be bought off of sound preference. Unless you're running a turbo...which needs specific high flowing mufflers.
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Feb 15, 2006
#8
  • Feb 15, 2006
  • #8
Since you still have the stock manifolds, I would move to lt's.

I know you got a mid pipe aready, but I'd just modify it or sell it and still tell you to go lt's.

Honestly, I don't think it makes all that much difference if you go with BBK or Mac.

You see about the same amount of praise & poop for each brand

I'm not as knowledgeable about how forced induction effects a combo as NA
but
When talking about NA, lt's will most definitely prop up your low end by a substantial amount and add strength to your mid range as well. You get the benefit of the scavenging effect when talking NA.

Seems like the same would be in place if one was forced
but
I do wanna make it clear, I'm not certain in this case

Grady
 

Yobi1Kanobi

Member
Apr 9, 2003
559
0
16
Feb 15, 2006
#9
  • Feb 15, 2006
  • #9
You had me at that you still have your stock headers
 
F

flygilmore

New Member
Mar 31, 2005
33
0
0
Feb 15, 2006
#10
  • Feb 15, 2006
  • #10
You know what I meant(stock manifolds)-I was typing in a hurry at work. Anyway, I am going to be picking up a set of ceramic coated ones in the next day or two and matching h-pipe as well. Thanks for the input.
 
F

fiveo'cobra

New Member
Oct 7, 2004
241
0
0
SC
Feb 16, 2006
#11
  • Feb 16, 2006
  • #11
nmcgrawj said:
Eh...is this something you tested and found yourself? Or is this just something that was "passed" down?


Im asking you cause George Klass at Accufab has done tests between h and x pipes...the result? He still sticks to h's. A lot of it goes into the design of the x...as some actually hurt you.

I guess im just saying that info like this isnt always the best for someone...i still think mufflers and midpipes should be bought off of sound preference. Unless you're running a turbo...which needs specific high flowing mufflers.
Click to expand...


Well i havent tried it myself no, since i've never had a blower. I've seen numerous dynographs of it though. When you have a 400whp + car, you are moving ALOT of air and an x-pipe is a smoother transition in that it doesnt have the sharp angles an H pipe does through the tubing. There was a guy on the svt forums that had a 580whp blown 95' that replaced his offroad h to and offroad x and gained 12whp from it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Exhaust 1 3/4” Long Tubes on a Fox Body AOD – Easiest route?
  • 5.0 Mike
  • Mar 19, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 21, 2025
5.0 Mike
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 95 GT/Saleen Supercharged 331 install
  • from6to8
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
718
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
S
Fox '87 GT can't get to stay running
  • spilly
  • Mar 29, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
26
Views
570
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 25, 2026
CAMTWO1070
A
95 Gt intermittent backfire
  • A_A_Ron
  • May 26, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
396
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 26, 2025
A_A_Ron
A
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
684
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 28, 2026
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?