• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-

95vs96

  • Thread starter Thread starter Cory281
  • Start date Start date Oct 19, 2006

Cory281

Member
Jun 6, 2004
240
0
17
Oct 19, 2006
#1
  • Oct 19, 2006
  • #1
Hey guys I know 5.0vs 4.6 has been done over and over, and I just wanted to say I think both motors are great with their own advantages, imo. Anyway I was wondering the other night if you had a 95vs96 go up against each other. Everyone always says it's a drivers race, but does one or the other eventually ever pull away from the other completly bone stock? But the real question is this, which is better modded? If you take the 4.6 and put the PI intake, cams, and heads on it. Then do the same on the 5.0 with some aftermarket heads, intake manifold, and cams. Maybe other bolt ons like gears, exhaust things like that. Which would win?

Sorry if this thread has been done before and please lets not make this a big argument with people hating 5.0s or 4.6s. I have just honestly been wondering about this.
 

d98gt

Founding Member
Mar 14, 2002
4,505
59
204
SE Texas
Oct 19, 2006
#2
  • Oct 19, 2006
  • #2
Modded--- I'll go with the 95

The 5.0 has many more options when it comes to h/c/i modifications, and I believe it responds better to mods
 

Dusstbuster

I love meat more than anything! I just have a spec
May 31, 2004
1,462
33
64
Moorhead, Minnesota
Oct 19, 2006
#3
  • Oct 19, 2006
  • #3
If you're willing to wait til next spring I have a friend (mistercmk on here) who has a 95 or 94 I believe it is with the 5.0 and my 96 with the PI cams/manifold and we'll be running them next spring. Not sure what he's got on it really but by then i'll have some more on mine as well so they should be fairly close mod-wise, except the whole his 5spd vs my auto.
 

COramprat

...I can take it. I think.
20+ Year Stangneter
Mar 2, 2003
8,474
1,463
223
Sea of Tranquility
Oct 19, 2006
#4
  • Oct 19, 2006
  • #4
Plus the mods for the 5.0 are cheaper.
 

CanadaStang

New Member
Sep 7, 2003
2,093
1
0
Mb
Oct 19, 2006
#5
  • Oct 19, 2006
  • #5
COramprat said:
Plus the mods for the 5.0 are cheaper.
Click to expand...

Hmmmm......I don't know, I priced out a few things for my old 91' 5.0 and was suprised to find how expensive the stuff was. I found a head/cam intake package from Summit by Trick Flow for $2199.99 and the kit from Holly was $2229.95 Heads alone were $1287 and the GT40 intake was $600 Yipes!!
 

Orange...

New Member
Aug 22, 2004
59
0
0
SASKATOON
Oct 19, 2006
#6
  • Oct 19, 2006
  • #6
When I have seen it at track the 95 takes the 96 in the low end then they 96 will catch up they seem to even out around the end and get very similar times.

But everyone still seems to say that the 95 will take the 96...
 

CobraRed_96_GT

Active Member
May 20, 2006
1,421
4
39
UCSD/La Jolla
Oct 19, 2006
#7
  • Oct 19, 2006
  • #7
5.0 parts ARE cheaper. everytime i look at headers i cry when i see ceramic 5.0 headers for $165 and LT's for $240
 

CanadaStang

New Member
Sep 7, 2003
2,093
1
0
Mb
Oct 19, 2006
#8
  • Oct 19, 2006
  • #8
CobraRed_96_GT said:
5.0 parts ARE cheaper. everytime i look at headers i cry when i see ceramic 5.0 headers for $165 and LT's for $240
Click to expand...
Ya headers are cheaper for the 5.0 as well as just having to buy the one cam as opposed to the two for the 4.6 but I was suprised to find out how much the heads and intake was going to be.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

W
I have some 4.6 questions.
  • whiskerz
  • Nov 14, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
5
Views
320
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Nov 25, 2025
squeak93
My first post
  • myproGTv
  • May 31, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
2
Views
160
The Welcome Wagon May 31, 2026
myproGTv
J
Engine 4.6 Running rough at half throttle
  • jake411
  • Aug 3, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
190
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Aug 4, 2026
jake411
J
9
Engine Donor '00 Mountaineer meet '91 Fox
  • 91firecracker
  • May 11, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
41
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 28, 2026
91firecracker
9
J
Low RPM jerking
  • Justinkins
  • Jul 8, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
188
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 11, 2026
fasterthangas
F
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?