This is clearly a matter of personal opinion (fun to debate, but ultimately pointless to argue over). That said, I still think keeping horizontal brake lights has some merit.
Someone said it well above that verticle lights are the more common layout with the line of Mustangs (heritage). That argues strongly for keeping the one distinctive styling trait on our cars (Ford even kept true to the heritage in a way by using 3 lights). But more importantly, don't you feel a certain let down when you see the 4.6 on the side, or verticle tails on a SN-95, since that means there's a weak, early modular motor in there? I do.
As far as the tribars, come on. Ford has been making crappy, fugly wheels from the beginning. So there is nothing unique about the desire/need to upgrade our boring stock wheels, as is with most years (with a few exceptions).
I'm lost on the comment about not going to a 93 elbow conversion. WTF? Mustang motors are meant to be modded.
But to each his own. Mod away, and enjoy.
Someone said it well above that verticle lights are the more common layout with the line of Mustangs (heritage). That argues strongly for keeping the one distinctive styling trait on our cars (Ford even kept true to the heritage in a way by using 3 lights). But more importantly, don't you feel a certain let down when you see the 4.6 on the side, or verticle tails on a SN-95, since that means there's a weak, early modular motor in there? I do.
As far as the tribars, come on. Ford has been making crappy, fugly wheels from the beginning. So there is nothing unique about the desire/need to upgrade our boring stock wheels, as is with most years (with a few exceptions).
I'm lost on the comment about not going to a 93 elbow conversion. WTF? Mustang motors are meant to be modded.
But to each his own. Mod away, and enjoy.