• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

96 GT keep or get 99 GT

  • Thread starter Thread starter jcint
  • Start date Start date Jun 24, 2005
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3

Mike97gt

it doe snot
Founding Member
Jan 26, 1999
10,633
7
89
the people's republic of massachusetts
Jun 28, 2005
#41
  • Jun 28, 2005
  • #41
02mingreyconv said:



A pre 99 mustang has less than 200 rwhp stock.

A 99+ mustang has 220-230 rwhp stock.

You claim to beat 'bolt on 99+'s'. Can we assume that they have a CAI, exhaust and pullies? That would put them close to 250.

Now explain to me how you beat them most of the time.
Click to expand...



you know how he beats them . HE CAN DRIVE HIS ASS OFF by looking at those times. 1.76 60 ft is excellent.

and looking at his trap he is making about the same hp/weight sounds liek he did some weight reduction to get that time out of the car.

so while the guy in a 99+ is listening too his mach 460 and lighting the tires up from the launch and not powershifting. this guy is nailing the launch and shifting hard
 

CanadaStang

New Member
Sep 7, 2003
2,093
1
0
Mb
Jun 28, 2005
#42
  • Jun 28, 2005
  • #42
MikeZ28 said:
you know how he beats them . HE CAN DRIVE HIS ASS OFF by looking at those times. 1.76 60 ft is excellent.

and looking at his trap he is making about the same hp/weight sounds liek he did some weight reduction to get that time out of the car.

so while the guy in a 99+ is listening too his mach 460 and lighting the tires up from the launch and not powershifting. this guy is nailing the launch and shifting hard
Click to expand...
Well ya, there's that and the fact that the track he's running at has a density altitude of -1244ft below sea level.
 
J

Joel's98GT

New Member
Jan 3, 2004
368
0
0
central OH
Jun 28, 2005
#43
  • Jun 28, 2005
  • #43
CanadaStang said:
Well ya, there's that and the fact that the track he's running at has a density altitude of -1244ft below sea level.
Click to expand...

yeah that was an awesome day, that was no wieght reduction other than empty trunk.

this year i've cut out about 125lbs so far, added a plenum and TB too, yet to go to the track untill i install my linelock. With a set of headers (next mod) it should go 12's on stock heads
 
0

02mingreyconv

New Member
Sep 27, 2003
127
0
0
Bartlett, IL
Jun 28, 2005
#44
  • Jun 28, 2005
  • #44
MikeZ28 said:
you know how he beats them . HE CAN DRIVE HIS ASS OFF by looking at those times. 1.76 60 ft is excellent.

and looking at his trap he is making about the same hp/weight sounds liek he did some weight reduction to get that time out of the car.

so while the guy in a 99+ is listening too his mach 460 and lighting the tires up from the launch and not powershifting. this guy is nailing the launch and shifting hard
Click to expand...


Joel can drive his car, no doubt.

But take a 99+ and give him similar mods and it will be in the 12's (4.10 gears, exhaust, CAI, pullies, shifter, suspension and DR's).

So I would get a 99+ mustang over the older ones any day if we are comparing power & speed. Now if we start to talk about looks etc then it comes down to personal taste and opinion.

Joe
 

CanadaStang

New Member
Sep 7, 2003
2,093
1
0
Mb
Jun 28, 2005
#45
  • Jun 28, 2005
  • #45
Joel's98GT said:
yeah that was an awesome day, that was no wieght reduction other than empty trunk.

this year i've cut out about 125lbs so far, added a plenum and TB too, yet to go to the track untill i install my linelock. With a set of headers (next mod) it should go 12's on stock heads
Click to expand...

Very impressive indeed!!
I'm thinking the only way my car would have gone through the 1/4 mile that fast before the Pi headswap, would be to push it out the back of a cargo plane.
 
A

Azarello

New Member
Apr 29, 2005
115
0
0
Jun 28, 2005
#46
  • Jun 28, 2005
  • #46
Robin said:
I have a '99 GT and I love it! My first mustang was a '95 GT, but all it took was one look at the '99 to know that I would have one. My current car is also a lot faster than my '95 was.

I like the boxy style of the 99+ much better than the curvy SN95's. I think it's a much more agressive and sexy body style.
Click to expand...

I hate the 99-04's. They are by far the worst looking stangs I've seen. I was about to buy one but I stop myself and said "How the hell can I buy a car that I hate how it looks" So I jumped on a 96 gt. It has 91K on right now and my plan is to do the headswap before it hits 100K. Keep the 96 gt and keep modding. You won't regret it.
 

CanadaStang

New Member
Sep 7, 2003
2,093
1
0
Mb
Jun 28, 2005
#47
  • Jun 28, 2005
  • #47
Azarello said:
I hate the 99-04's. They are by far the worst looking stangs I've seen. I was about to buy one but I stop myself and said "How the hell can I buy a car that I hate how it looks" So I jumped on a 96 gt. It has 91K on right now and my plan is to do the headswap before it hits 100K. Keep the 96 gt and keep modding. You won't regret it.
Click to expand...
As 02mingreyconv says, it all boils down to personal preference. Say, does that mean you'd take a mid 70's era Mustang II over an 04' GT?
 

Robin

New Member
Mar 30, 2005
16
0
0
Sunny Central Florida
Jun 28, 2005
#48
  • Jun 28, 2005
  • #48
CanadaStang said:
As 02mingreyconv says, it all boils down to personal preference. ...
Click to expand...


That's it, in a nutshell. I fell in love with my car the minute I saw it, and I knew I was going to buy it.


Getting back to the original poster - something else (and I didn't read every single reply, so forgive me if this is a repost) to think about is your financial position.

Does it make more sense to keep your current car & put money into it? (meaning - is it paid off?) Or does it make more sense to take on a car payment, or even a bigger car payment to get a newer car with more HP before any mods are done?
 

GDawg

Founding Member
Mar 22, 2002
1,469
19
68
Nevada
Jun 28, 2005
#49
  • Jun 28, 2005
  • #49
Robin said:
That's it, in a nutshell. I fell in love with my car the minute I saw it, and I knew I was going to buy it.


Getting back to the original poster - something else (and I didn't read every single reply, so forgive me if this is a repost) to think about is your financial position.

Does it make more sense to keep your current car & put money into it? (meaning - is it paid off?) Or does it make more sense to take on a car payment, or even a bigger car payment to get a newer car with more HP before any mods are done?
Click to expand...

45 hp (or 35 extra hp in my case with a '98) is hardly worth buying another car even if it's used. Put the PI heads on my car for under $1000 and my car will be 10 horses over a '99+ without other mods. Then every other mod is mod for mod.

Plus, if you can't drive it what's the horsepower going to do for you anyway?

My SC is on it's way and then the "boxes" won't stand a chance until they go blown too... My next door neighbor soups up Corvettes and he and I are really getting along. This winter the pony goes into the garage and next spring is going to come out a beast with body stylings too...

 
J

Joel's98GT

New Member
Jan 3, 2004
368
0
0
central OH
Jun 29, 2005
#50
  • Jun 29, 2005
  • #50
02mingreyconv said:
Joel can drive his car, no doubt.

But take a 99+ and give him similar mods and it will be in the 12's (4.10 gears, exhaust, CAI, pullies, shifter, suspension and DR's).

So I would get a 99+ mustang over the older ones any day if we are comparing power & speed. Now if we start to talk about looks etc then it comes down to personal taste and opinion.

Joe
Click to expand...

i don't deny that, but a majority of GT's don't have all those mods

if i had to do it again, i would have bought a 96-97 because you don't have as much crap to deal with from this bastard year, then i would swap in a explorer motor. (PI motor aluminum block)

actually i may do the 2nd part anyway
 

jcint

Member
Mar 30, 2005
168
2
16
wellington florida
Jun 29, 2005
#51
  • Jun 29, 2005
  • #51
After much consideration I think i will keep the 96 gt and do the Pi swap. I really do love the look and feel just wish it had a little more POWER! My only concern is that it does eat up alot of oil meaning every 3000 or so miles i need to put maybe 2 quarts back into the engine. but it has no leaks or smokes!
 

96WhiteNight

New Member
May 11, 2004
303
0
0
Carlisle, PA
Jun 29, 2005
#52
  • Jun 29, 2005
  • #52
Mine burns a half a quart every 3000 but i have heard that from a lot of 4.6 drivers. 2 qts is a lot might wana have that checked out
 

jcint

Member
Mar 30, 2005
168
2
16
wellington florida
Jun 29, 2005
#53
  • Jun 29, 2005
  • #53
96WhiteNight said:
Mine burns a half a quart every 3000 but i have heard that from a lot of 4.6 drivers. 2 qts is a lot might wana have that checked out
Click to expand...
I might be exagerating a bit but i guess the oil loss is normal.
 
J

Joel's98GT

New Member
Jan 3, 2004
368
0
0
central OH
Jun 29, 2005
#54
  • Jun 29, 2005
  • #54
jcint said:
I might be exagerating a bit but i guess the oil loss is normal.
Click to expand...


i lose about 1 qt every 3000/
 

Robin

New Member
Mar 30, 2005
16
0
0
Sunny Central Florida
Jul 2, 2005
#55
  • Jul 2, 2005
  • #55
GDawg said:
45 hp (or 35 extra hp in my case with a '98) is hardly worth buying another car even if it's used. Put the PI heads on my car for under $1000 and my car will be 10 horses over a '99+ without other mods. Then every other mod is mod for mod.

Plus, if you can't drive it what's the horsepower going to do for you anyway?

My SC is on it's way and then the "boxes" won't stand a chance until they go blown too... My next door neighbor soups up Corvettes and he and I are really getting along. This winter the pony goes into the garage and next spring is going to come out a beast with body stylings too...

Click to expand...

Weelllll ............... you had to spend money to modify your car to get it to where my car is now.


Again, it all comes down to personal preference (and what you can afford). I love my sexy 99+ as it is... it doesn't need a body kit.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Q
Resolved 96 crown Vic ECU in a mustang gt
  • QuickDibbles
  • Aug 30, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
5
Views
711
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Sep 27, 2025
Noobz347
C
99 mustang gt no signal to fire coils
  • Cerana04
  • Oct 4, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
0
Views
132
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 4, 2025
Cerana04
C
D
96 get convertible-sell or part out?
  • DTCstang
  • May 17, 2026
  • What is it Worth?!?!?
Replies
5
Views
134
What is it Worth?!?!? May 18, 2026
nickyb
A
Procharger install/prep questions
  • ahratrew
  • Nov 22, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
371
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Nov 26, 2025
Noobz347
B
97 GT with 03 explorer Eddie Bauer edition 4.6l
  • basbill73
  • May 10, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
62
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- May 11, 2026
squeak93
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?