• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

96 mustang GT with pi swap needs help on what's next

  • Thread starter Thread starter BAMA96\4.6
  • Start date Start date Oct 9, 2009
B

BAMA96\4.6

New Member
Oct 9, 2009
2
0
0
Oct 9, 2009
#1
  • Oct 9, 2009
  • #1
hey yall i have a 96 mustang GT with a pi swap i need a little help on what to do next i know i wanna get gears, and a different intake but other than that i need help on what kinda supercharger would be the best for my car i'm not quite sure i've heard alot of different opinions from alot of different friends so yall just hit me back up and let me know what all of yalls say thanks yall
 
4

40oz

Member
Jan 9, 2006
499
3
18
Minneapolis
Oct 9, 2009
#2
  • Oct 9, 2009
  • #2
it's not what supercharger is best for the car, but rather what is best for what you want.

Centrifugal builds power as rpms climb, and really plays to the strengths of an overhead cam engine. They move more air the faster they spin, feeling kind of like a turbo as they give little gain off idle but big gains at high rpms.

Positive-displacement types, like Roots and twin-srew, build power across the powerband. Basically increasing displacement, as they push the same amount of air every rpm and give roughly the same boost in power regardless of rpm.

Both are nice in their own way, with advantages and disadvantages to each. In simple terms, a centri's high rpm boost is safer as there is little time for detonation. And you get a huge rush of power as rpms climb. On the other hand, the broader power band from a positive displacement blower results in a faster 1/4 mile car for a given peak power level because there is more power everywhere.

That's just a gross simplification, ignoring things like added weight, heat soak, ease of using intercoolers, etc. etc. I don't think either one is bad, but whether it is ideal depends on intended use and personal preference.
 
A

AntiRice98

Member
Dec 6, 2005
158
0
16
Oct 9, 2009
#3
  • Oct 9, 2009
  • #3
If you still have a stock bottom end your compression ratio will be around 10.7:1 with the PI swap. So unless you want to run VERY low psi I would not get a power adder. Or you can kiss your bottom end good bye.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

D
Drivetrain Using a 98 Cobra T45 in a 03 GT Auto
  • dylan9075
  • Jun 2, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
0
Views
139
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Jun 2, 2026
dylan9075
D
T
Need help with 302 swap
  • thxmxrgx
  • Sep 23, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
253
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 24, 2026
thxmxrgx
T
J
i need help
  • JK.
  • Oct 24, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
22
Views
534
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 28, 2026
JD1964
Q
Resolved 96 crown Vic ECU in a mustang gt
  • QuickDibbles
  • Aug 30, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
5
Views
944
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Sep 27, 2025
Noobz347
M
1996 GT Speedometer electrical nightmare
  • moon96gt
  • Oct 7, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
158
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 17, 2026
CAMTWO1070
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?