• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SVT Tech Forum

97 Cobra Headers?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 97venom
  • Start date Start date Apr 28, 2009
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
9

97venom

New Member
Apr 28, 2009
3
0
0
West Des Moines, IA
Apr 28, 2009
#1
  • Apr 28, 2009
  • #1
Help! Trying to find a good set of long tubes for my 97 cobra. Whats good? Who makes them? Please help new to the modular family!
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Apr 28, 2009
#2
  • Apr 28, 2009
  • #2
SLP, Kooks and Bassani are some of the top choices

BBK would be another less expensive choice. It all depends on what you're looking to spend.
 
9

97venom

New Member
Apr 28, 2009
3
0
0
West Des Moines, IA
Apr 28, 2009
#3
  • Apr 28, 2009
  • #3
Bang for the buck

I really dont want to spend more than 400 bucks or so cause i'm planing on twin turboing it in the next year or so. I saw flowtech's and pacesetters but havnt heard anything good about flowtechs and havnt heard anything at all about the pacesetters. I dont want something thats going to fit like sh*! and leak all the time, but i'm not worried about ceramic coatings or anything as I will be getting rid of them in a year or so. Let me know if you have any ideas or have heard anything about either of those brands.
 

COBRA90GT

Mustang Master
Sep 22, 2001
6,654
0
87
HOCKEYTOWN ® , MI
Apr 29, 2009
#4
  • Apr 29, 2009
  • #4
97venom said:
... i'm planing on twin turboing it in the next year or so...
Click to expand...



Well, if that's the case, save your money for the twin turbo kit and/or associated plumbing costs instead.
 

Gallows

Member
Mar 30, 2005
16
0
8
Summerside, PE, Canada
May 4, 2009
#5
  • May 4, 2009
  • #5
+1 ^ Don't waste money on headers. What brand of turbos are you going with.
 

slayr281

The poster formerly known as slayr420
Founding Member
Jun 15, 1999
7,591
18
98
San Diego, California
May 5, 2009
#6
  • May 5, 2009
  • #6
97venom said:
I really dont want to spend more than 400 bucks or so cause i'm planing on twin turboing it in the next year or so.
Click to expand...
Like the response above me, might be your best choice to wait for that twin turbo kit instead. Depending on the design/system, you may have custom exhaust headers coming with the kit, and while you could sell the "old" ones, might not be worth the hassle, especially with the installing and uninstalling (they are somewhat of a pain).
 

horsinaround9

New Member
May 13, 2009
5
0
1
May 13, 2009
#7
  • May 13, 2009
  • #7
97venom said:
Help! Trying to find a good set of long tubes for my 97 cobra. Whats good? Who makes them? Please help new to the modular family!
Click to expand...

I used a set of bbks on my 01 cobra awhile back. They fit well. I gasket matched them at the flange as they were very restricted with the bead of weld. I couldnt swing a nice set of kooks at the time so bbk I went. With a p1sc, 12lbs of boost,42lb injectors, and a 03 cobra pump it made 450 hp and 540 ft/lbs to the tire. Pretty respectible for what was done to it I think. I would buy them again.
 

SVT32VDOHC

waiting for the next hack atta
Founding Member
Nov 22, 2001
3,501
28
119
Motor City
May 15, 2009
#8
  • May 15, 2009
  • #8
Don't waste your money on LT's!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I regret them because of trans and clutches that need replacing after the LT's are installed.


BTW.....My friend's supercharged 97 gained 13 RWHP with the addition of LT's. He had it dynoed before and after.

Is 13 RWHP worth $500 plus labor??????
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
May 15, 2009
#9
  • May 15, 2009
  • #9
SVT32VDOHC said:
BTW.....My friend's supercharged 97 gained 13 RWHP with the addition of LT's. He had it dynoed before and after.

Is 13 RWHP worth $500 plus labor??????
Click to expand...

But how much was picked up across the entire power band. There's more to making power than just peek figures. I'd be interested in seeing what his torque figures looked like.

I agree, the stock manifolds to a decent job of evacuating spent exhaust gases and carrying horsepower figures into the 450rwhp range, but the torque gains that can be had with a properly matched set of Long Tube headers are more than worth the cost IMO.
 

SVT32VDOHC

waiting for the next hack atta
Founding Member
Nov 22, 2001
3,501
28
119
Motor City
May 15, 2009
#10
  • May 15, 2009
  • #10
Gearbanger 101 said:
But how much was picked up across the entire power band. There's more to making power than just peek figures. I'd be interested in seeing what his torque figures looked like.

I agree, the stock manifolds to a decent job of evacuating spent exhaust gases and carrying horsepower figures into the 450rwhp range, but the torque gains that can be had with a properly matched set of Long Tube headers are more than worth the cost IMO.
Click to expand...

Not sure across the board. I went on my local forum and found the thread and before and after numbers. He never posted the graph.....here....

Only change was some BBK Longtube headers and x pipe.

Before:
459 RWHP
403 RWTQ

After:
473 RWHP
420 RWTQ

14RWHP and 17RWTQ. I don't think that's worth the cost of the headers themselves let alone the time it takes to install them or the cost of labor if someone does them. I regret doing them on my 96.

My 04 will never get LT's. It made almost 600RWHP with stock manifolds. Could make more too with 19-21psi vs. 17psi.....Plus our tuner thinks I had some spark blowing off the plugs on the top end. lol
 

horsinaround9

New Member
May 13, 2009
5
0
1
May 15, 2009
#11
  • May 15, 2009
  • #11
SVT32VDOHC said:
Don't waste your money on LT's!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I regret them because of trans and clutches that need replacing after the LT's are installed.


BTW.....My friend's supercharged 97 gained 13 RWHP with the addition of LT's. He had it dynoed before and after.

Is 13 RWHP worth $500 plus labor??????
Click to expand...

Different strokes, different folks. To me it is worth it. It took me a afternoon to install the headers and tubular k and all. Like others have said its not just the peak numbers you look at. Oh well just my 02 cents
 

SVT32VDOHC

waiting for the next hack atta
Founding Member
Nov 22, 2001
3,501
28
119
Motor City
May 16, 2009
#12
  • May 16, 2009
  • #12
Still isn't worth the money though. Just throw more boost at it. It's cheaper and will give you gobs more power than the headers.
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
May 16, 2009
#13
  • May 16, 2009
  • #13
SVT32VDOHC said:
Still isn't worth the money though. Just throw more boost at it. It's cheaper and will give you gobs more power than the headers.
Click to expand...

Ahhh, but the object of the game is to make as much, or more power using the least amount of boost for engine and blower longevity. Not to mention that freeing up things on one end means room to grow on the other.

If one could make the same or more horsepower turning their blower 5-10% slower and without stressing head gaskets or bottom end components, why wouldn't that be a good idea?

And picking up 14rwhp/17rwtq at peek and gains accross the board for around $500....you don't consider that a worth while bolt on? How many other bolt ons do you know of short of a power adder that will add that much power, for that little money?
 

horsinaround9

New Member
May 13, 2009
5
0
1
May 16, 2009
#14
  • May 16, 2009
  • #14
SVT32VDOHC said:
Still isn't worth the money though. Just throw more boost at it. It's cheaper and will give you gobs more power than the headers.
Click to expand...

So why not more boost and long tubes ??? You would make even more power.
When i build something i try to get as much power out of it as possible. The horsepower gain at the crankshaft is well worth the 500 $$ investment and a afternoons work to me and many others. I will bet you would be surprised by how much more power your car would make with a nice set of long tubes.
 

blackfang

Founding Member
Dec 17, 2001
1,290
1
39
Richmond, Va
May 17, 2009
#15
  • May 17, 2009
  • #15
I loved my LT's. I definitely felt a huge low and midrange gain. The install wasn't too bad. I ran flowtechs for a few years without any leaks or issues. Still able to drop the trans if needed too. Plus the car sounded sick as hell when you got on it too

Again do not focus on the peak power numbers because that is not the objective. Plus if you decide to go a heads/cams or a FI route those LT's will make those gains even better.
If you plan on going w/ a turbo do not get them. It will be cheaper to sit down, plan out the goals of the car and what you want from it, then plan the mods to achieve that.
 

SVT32VDOHC

waiting for the next hack atta
Founding Member
Nov 22, 2001
3,501
28
119
Motor City
May 18, 2009
#16
  • May 18, 2009
  • #16
Gearbanger 101 said:
Ahhh, but the object of the game is to make as much, or more power using the least amount of boost for engine and blower longevity. Not to mention that freeing up things on one end means room to grow on the other.

If one could make the same or more horsepower turning their blower 5-10% slower and without stressing head gaskets or bottom end components, why wouldn't that be a good idea?

And picking up 14rwhp/17rwtq at peek and gains accross the board for around $500....you don't consider that a worth while bolt on? How many other bolt ons do you know of short of a power adder that will add that much power, for that little money?
Click to expand...


horsinaround9 said:
So why not more boost and long tubes ??? You would make even more power.
When i build something i try to get as much power out of it as possible. The horsepower gain at the crankshaft is well worth the 500 $$ investment and a afternoons work to me and many others. I will bet you would be surprised by how much more power your car would make with a nice set of long tubes.
Click to expand...

LT's just aren't worth it. I have longtubes and I am saying they are not worth it. It is not worth the hassle when a clutch or trans goes bad or gives you issues. I don't even beat on my car and I've had a Centerforce PP go bad and the T45 reverse synchro replaced and both times it was a hassle.

Numbers aren't everything. 400-600-800 HP cars all feel the same when they are spinning their tires. I'm so sick of hearing about squeaking every single little pony out of cars. It makes me sick. I would put LT money towards some good suspension parts or tires to get your car to run better times. There are many SN members who have the HP to run only 13's, but they are running 12's because of suspension and tires.

Big HP numbers are for Dyno Queens and bragging rights, which I am not either one of those with either of my cars. I drive them.
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
May 18, 2009
#17
  • May 18, 2009
  • #17
SVT32VDOHC said:
LT's just aren't worth it. I have longtubes and I am saying they are not worth it. It is not worth the hassle when a clutch or trans goes bad or gives you issues. I don't even beat on my car and I've had a Centerforce PP go bad and the T45 reverse synchro replaced and both times it was a hassle.

Numbers aren't everything. 400-600-800 HP cars all feel the same when they are spinning their tires. I'm so sick of hearing about squeaking every single little pony out of cars. It makes me sick. I would put LT money towards some good suspension parts or tires to get your car to run better times. There are many SN members who have the HP to run only 13's, but they are running 12's because of suspension and tires.

Big HP numbers are for Dyno Queens and bragging rights, which I am not either one of those with either of my cars. I drive them.
Click to expand...

Well, coming from someone who's also running a set of LT's, I say they are worth it. You make it sound as the the headers are responsible for your clutch or transmission issues? Have trouble accessing your trans..then I guess you bought the wrong header. I can get to my R470W just fine with my Kooks?

I also find the "sick of hearing about squeaking every single little pony our of our cars" and "Big HP numbers are for Dyno Queens and bragging rights" statements a little ironic coming from someone who's built not one, but two high powered Cobra's....one of which has minimal suspension mods and the other that's got none at all....but both are making 400 and 600hp though? By your own definition, you're one of the guys building a Dyno Queen, or bragging rights that you're chastising, whether you choose to admit it or not? I'm also betting you'd have a different attitude about squeezing every ounce of power out of your set up if were you still hovering around stock horsepower ranges.

You of all people should know, there's no such thing as "enough" when you start with the modding. You wouldn't have spent the kind of money you did on either of your cars if you really believed that.
 

SVT32VDOHC

waiting for the next hack atta
Founding Member
Nov 22, 2001
3,501
28
119
Motor City
May 18, 2009
#18
  • May 18, 2009
  • #18
Gearbanger 101 said:
Well, coming from someone who's also running a set of LT's, I say they are worth it. You make it sound as the the headers are responsible for your clutch or transmission issues? Have trouble accessing your trans..then I guess you bought the wrong header. I can get to my R470W just fine with my Kooks?

I also find the "sick of hearing about squeaking every single little pony our of our cars" and "Big HP numbers are for Dyno Queens and bragging rights" statements a little ironic coming from someone who's built not one, but two high powered Cobra's....one of which has minimal suspension mods and the other that's got none at all....but both are making 400 and 600hp though? By your own definition, you're one of the guys building a Dyno Queen, or bragging rights that you're chastising, whether you choose to admit it or not? I'm also betting you'd have a different attitude about squeezing every ounce of power out of your set up if were you still hovering around stock horsepower ranges.

You of all people should know, there's no such thing as "enough" when you start with the modding. You wouldn't have spent the kind of money you did on either of your cars if you really believed that.
Click to expand...

My LT's have been on since 2001. I went with those first since I wanted more power. My tuner didn't have a dyno at that time so I don't know the number difference N/A, but my whole arguement started when I saw this thread because I knew how much they added on a friend's car that is similar to mine. And that car is supercharged. An N/A Cobra motor won't pick up numbers close to that of a supercharged Cobra motor. After hearing his results I kicked myself for wasting money, but that was 8 years ago, that money is long gone.

BTW...Kooks....I didn't hear of those in 2001. I started hearing of those in 03-04 and in 07-08 again when the Terminator and Shelby guys started modding.

My statement sounds ironic, but it's true. All of my friends know that I do not brag about my cars HP numbers and I never go cruising around and pick on people for races. I just drive. If they mess with me....I MIGHT take them up on a race, but I am very humble when I drive. I hate guys who act better because their car is faster. I usually just slow down or speed up a little so they are not pacing me.

The only mods on my 96's suspension are the Mega Bite Jr's (which helped with 60ft times) and Lakewood 50/50's, (which make the car ride like ****). I hardly call those mods. If I went tubular up front, coil overs all the way around and a 5 link rear, I would call that suspension mods, but I don't drag race enough, or take it seriouslly.
 

Cobra Jay

Member
Apr 7, 2004
889
0
16
Motor City
May 18, 2009
#19
  • May 18, 2009
  • #19
View attachment 257539
 

SVT32VDOHC

waiting for the next hack atta
Founding Member
Nov 22, 2001
3,501
28
119
Motor City
May 18, 2009
#20
  • May 18, 2009
  • #20
GT JAY said:
View attachment 257538
Click to expand...

Gone, but not forgotten? Where is your 2003 GT vert going....and why is there a 96 Cobra in your sig coming soon?? That's what type of car I have.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

97 Cobra Keyless entry ?
  • Kid wita 5oh
  • Apr 4, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
9
Views
113
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Apr 14, 2026
Kid wita 5oh
4v cobra exhaust compatibility
  • Kid wita 5oh
  • Feb 20, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
286
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Mar 30, 2026
squeak93
L
2001 cobra sequential tail lights
  • lking78
  • May 26, 2026
  • SVT Tech Forum
Replies
2
Views
67
SVT Tech Forum May 27, 2026
lking78
L
G
S550 Headers
  • gray owl
  • Feb 1, 2026
  • 2015 - 2023 (S550) Mustang -General/Talk
Replies
0
Views
196
2015 - 2023 (S550) Mustang -General/Talk Feb 1, 2026
gray owl
G
F
Difference between 83-86 EFI and 87-97 gas tanks?
  • ForeverDrivin
  • Mar 30, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
159
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 30, 2026
ForeverDrivin
F
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SVT Tech Forum
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?