• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

99-04 2v header reccomendations-shorty and longtube

  • Thread starter Thread starter musclemustangcb
  • Start date Start date Mar 7, 2012

musclemustangcb

Member
Nov 20, 2011
166
3
19
Mar 7, 2012
#1
  • Mar 7, 2012
  • #1
My buddy has a 99 and hes looking for a good set of headers. He will probably stay with shorthand but I'm also looking into long tubes for my 00 roush 2v. What do you guys reccomend for both?
 

slayerripkdc

15 Year Member
Jun 3, 2003
1,341
16
59
brewster ny
Mar 7, 2012
#2
  • Mar 7, 2012
  • #2
Macs are priced well and I never heard of any fitment issues.
 

trinity_gt

10 Year Member
Jan 31, 2003
3,125
81
99
Canada
Mar 7, 2012
#3
  • Mar 7, 2012
  • #3
LTs or don't bother. Shorties don't flow any better than the factory cast logs.
 
G

GtVert_00

Member
Feb 23, 2012
32
0
7
Mar 7, 2012
#4
  • Mar 7, 2012
  • #4
Stick with LT's and mac/slp's are the ones ive heard of that allow you to drop the tranny with out taking off the passengers side header, which is a huge time saver for transmission work.
 
D

Deleted member 38176

Mar 7, 2012
#5
  • Mar 7, 2012
  • #5
shorty - none

longtube - MAC

Mine fit like a glove and haven't had a single issue
 
0

04torktech

Member
Aug 23, 2010
121
0
17
Wilmington,DE
Mar 7, 2012
#6
  • Mar 7, 2012
  • #6
I have BBK and wasn't pleased with there fitment initially to be honest. They are long tubes of course I agree do that or nothing else. Helped a good bit in conjunction with the SC. I have heard great things about MAC. Does anyone know if MAC makes equal length? THat would be ideal.
 

AZmustang98

Member
Oct 19, 2011
373
17
19
Flagstaff, Arizona
Mar 7, 2012
#7
  • Mar 7, 2012
  • #7
Mac LT +1.

I picked mine up used for 150 bucks on CL.
 
4

40oz

Member
Jan 9, 2006
499
3
18
Minneapolis
Mar 8, 2012
#8
  • Mar 8, 2012
  • #8
trinity_gt said:
LTs or don't bother. Shorties don't flow any better than the factory cast logs.
Click to expand...
Good advice and well worth repeating.

But what is the weight savings vs. the factory cast iron manifolds?

I only ask because I'd like to lose the weight of the cast iron factory manifolds but not lose the factory ground clearance - it snows here and I drive all year round. Power issues are secondary compared to not getting stuck in a few inches of snow because my headers hang low.
 

Brian5934

Member
Nov 15, 2011
30
0
17
Abilene TX
Mar 8, 2012
#9
  • Mar 8, 2012
  • #9
I have BBK LT they sound great
 
G

GtVert_00

Member
Feb 23, 2012
32
0
7
Mar 8, 2012
#10
  • Mar 8, 2012
  • #10
40oz said:
Good advice and well worth repeating.

But what is the weight savings vs. the factory cast iron manifolds?

I only ask because I'd like to lose the weight of the cast iron factory manifolds but not lose the factory ground clearance - it snows here and I drive all year round. Power issues are secondary compared to not getting stuck in a few inches of snow because my headers hang low.
Click to expand...

pretty substantial, but then again do you really want to go through all that work and spend the cash for 10 lbs? lol
They are lighter but only n respect to each other the total effect that will have on your driving experience is slight if not noticable at all.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Z
Progress Thread zeth194 - New Guy on the Block
  • zeth194
  • Mar 19, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
572
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 26, 2026
LILCBRA
Exhaust 1 3/4” Long Tubes on a Fox Body AOD – Easiest route?
  • 5.0 Mike
  • Mar 19, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 21, 2025
5.0 Mike
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
908
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
Intended Headers and Trans, questions about fitment
  • from6to8
  • Aug 6, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
22
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 6, 2025
from6to8
Progress Thread The Mach Returns - Update/build thread
  • squeak93
  • Feb 20, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
350
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jun 1, 2026
squeak93
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?