• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

about TPS voltage..

  • Thread starter Thread starter TheRedBlur
  • Start date Start date Jun 28, 2006
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

TheRedBlur

Active Member
Jul 7, 2003
15
0
38
seattle
Jun 28, 2006
#1
  • Jun 28, 2006
  • #1
I know how to set it when the tb is in the car. But my car is out of commission and my throttle body is sitting in the next room. I was wondering if there is any way of setting it when it is off the car?
 

urban96

bubb rubb says:"woo woooooo"
Founding Member
Sep 24, 2002
3,464
1
69
Syracuse, NY
Jun 28, 2006
#2
  • Jun 28, 2006
  • #2
the 94/95 tb dosent need to be set

it takes a base reading when the car is turned on and works from that
 

bill302

Active Member
Nov 2, 2005
2,131
1
46
alabama,gadsden
Jun 28, 2006
#3
  • Jun 28, 2006
  • #3
urban96 said:
the 94/95 tb dosent need to be set

it takes a base reading when the car is turned on and works from that
Click to expand...
he's talking about setting the throttle position sensor(tps) without the throttle body(tb) being installed in the car... the tps does need to be set but i don't know a way to do it unless the tps is installed on the throttle body and the tps plugged into harness on vehicle...i think urban96 misunderstood the question....
 

BlackVert

15 Year Member
Oct 3, 2003
5,589
9
98
Bethesda, MD
Jun 28, 2006
#4
  • Jun 28, 2006
  • #4
nope, urban96 is right. when you turn on the car, the computer reads the voltage and takes that as the closed value
 

bill302

Active Member
Nov 2, 2005
2,131
1
46
alabama,gadsden
Jun 28, 2006
#5
  • Jun 28, 2006
  • #5
BlackVert said:
nope, urban96 is right. when you turn on the car, the computer reads the voltage and takes that as the closed value
Click to expand...
o.k are you saying when installed the tps is automatically set at .98-.99 volts if not can you explain i'm a little confused...or does the computer read where the volts are at and calls that voltage closed and/or is it not recommended to set tps at .98-.99 volts and i thought this is what urban96 was talking about...setting the tps at .98-.99 volts without throttle body being in the car.
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
34
129
Jun 28, 2006
#6
  • Jun 28, 2006
  • #6
This is always a nice source of debate. The 94-95 computers baseline the TPS reading upon start-up (so long as it's within tolerance - if not a limit code is generated). This IS TRUE ON MAF FOXES too, though no one ever believes it (per Probst).

Some guys think the car performs a little better when the TPS is dialed-in right on the edge of the closed throttle voltage limit. It's free to do, so I say go for it. It is necessary to do? Shouldnt be.
 

TheRedBlur

Active Member
Jul 7, 2003
15
0
38
seattle
Jun 28, 2006
#7
  • Jun 28, 2006
  • #7
BlackVert said:
nope, urban96 is right. when you turn on the car, the computer reads the voltage and takes that as the closed value
Click to expand...

that's crazy, but wouldn't the sensor peg at WOT if the voltage was a bit high when closed?
 

TheRedBlur

Active Member
Jul 7, 2003
15
0
38
seattle
Jun 28, 2006
#8
  • Jun 28, 2006
  • #8
oh yah, I should add that I've done H/C/I and installed an aftermarket throttle body.
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
34
129
Jun 28, 2006
#9
  • Jun 28, 2006
  • #9
TheRedBlur said:
that's crazy, but wouldn't the sensor peg at WOT if the voltage was a bit high when closed?
Click to expand...
It would require pressing less far into the gas pedal to achieve WOT TPS values.
Not sure on SN's, but they used to sell a harness for foxes that basically required less pedal depression to achieve WOT (on a fox, this happens at about 2.7 volts above the baseline setting).
 

BlackVert

15 Year Member
Oct 3, 2003
5,589
9
98
Bethesda, MD
Jun 28, 2006
#10
  • Jun 28, 2006
  • #10
TheRedBlur said:
that's crazy, but wouldn't the sensor peg at WOT if the voltage was a bit high when closed?
Click to expand...
ok then. think what you want.

here's an example. let's say the tps reads .81 at startup. that is .19 below 1.0, the "reference" value. in its main loop, when the eec reads the tps, it takes the value it gets (e.g. 1.34) and it adds .19 to it, to get 1.53. that is the value it uses.

if the initial value is, say 1.17, then the eec would subtract .17 from whatever it reads and use that.

doesn't seem too crazy to me.
 

TheRedBlur

Active Member
Jul 7, 2003
15
0
38
seattle
Jun 29, 2006
#11
  • Jun 29, 2006
  • #11
right, although I am drunk as hell, I see your point. however, my engine runs waay to rich at idle, rich to the point of stall. which means it wouldn't go under, it would read WOT at 3/4 instead of 4/4.. can you dig? I do understant that the 94-95 computer is adaptive, but if the sensors are out of range, yet still funciton, th ecomputer will have a hell of a time. Can I set my TPS (regeardless if it needs to be done or not), can I do it wthout the connector disconnectged? w/o wire probes?
 

BlackVert

15 Year Member
Oct 3, 2003
5,589
9
98
Bethesda, MD
Jun 29, 2006
#12
  • Jun 29, 2006
  • #12
TheRedBlur said:
right, although I am drunk as hell, I see your point. however, my engine runs waay to rich at idle, rich to the point of stall. which means it wouldn't go under, it would read WOT at 3/4 instead of 4/4.. can you dig? I do understant that the 94-95 computer is adaptive, but if the sensors are out of range, yet still funciton, th ecomputer will have a hell of a time. Can I set my TPS (regeardless if it needs to be done or not), can I do it wthout the connector disconnectged? w/o wire probes?
Click to expand...
i don't know how you would do that, sorry.

but you would probably also have to elongate the bolt holes because they are not designed to support adjusting the tps

your rich condition is most likely the tune. did you get a chip burned or are you doing it yourself?

OT: is your sig an excerpt from "Catcher in the Rye"? Great book! Good old Holden ...
 

mo_dingo

20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 26, 2003
3,031
2
58
Tucson, AZ
Jun 29, 2006
#13
  • Jun 29, 2006
  • #13
TheRedBlur said:
right, although I am drunk as hell, I see your point. however, my engine runs waay to rich at idle, rich to the point of stall. which means it wouldn't go under, it would read WOT at 3/4 instead of 4/4.. can you dig? I do understant that the 94-95 computer is adaptive, but if the sensors are out of range, yet still funciton, th ecomputer will have a hell of a time. Can I set my TPS (regeardless if it needs to be done or not), can I do it wthout the connector disconnectged? w/o wire probes?
Click to expand...

You have to have the tps installed, as well as the connector installed. YOu also have to backprobe the wires. No other way.

Remember, anything over 2.7V is considered WOT, so even if you are at 3/4 throttle, it's considered WOT. So a little tweaking of the tps won't change that. The little bit you can adjust the TPS will not make it go out of range. And this will not change your a/f ratio by any means.
Scott
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
34
129
Jun 30, 2006
#14
  • Jun 30, 2006
  • #14
Does it only require 2.7 TPS volts to be considered WOT, or is it 2.7 volts in addition to the baseline reading (like as on a fox, as I posted above)? 2.7 total sig return volts seems a bit low to me.

I had read that the two WOT thresholds (fox and 5N95) were very similar, but it wouldnt be the first time bad info was floating around.
 

tmoss

Gettin Wired
Founding Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,153
32
128
Saint Louis, MO
Jun 30, 2006
#15
  • Jun 30, 2006
  • #15
I know Probst put it at 2.7v but I don't recall that he qualified if that was on top of the base setting or if it was total voltage (including base setting).
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
34
129
Jun 30, 2006
#16
  • Jun 30, 2006
  • #16
Here's a post by S&2B's (I don't know him, nor have I talked with him, but he seems to have a decent handle on things). He indicates that it's 2.7 volts plus "turn on" voltage (turn-on voltage = the baseline ~1 volt, I presume).

http://forums.stangnet.com/showpost.php?p=5869635&postcount=8


I'd note that all the info in this post is fox-specific, in case someone knows the 94-95 TPS function to be different.
 

TheRedBlur

Active Member
Jul 7, 2003
15
0
38
seattle
Jun 30, 2006
#17
  • Jun 30, 2006
  • #17
interesting stuff. I thought it might be a good idea to set the tps because I knew a couple of people who set them and had much better driveability. but really, the problem is having a cam with 274in and 282ex durations on a stock chip lol.
 

TheRedBlur

Active Member
Jul 7, 2003
15
0
38
seattle
Jun 30, 2006
#18
  • Jun 30, 2006
  • #18
oh yah, the quote is from catcher in the rye. I like his style of writing, very conversational.
 

mo_dingo

20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 26, 2003
3,031
2
58
Tucson, AZ
Jun 30, 2006
#19
  • Jun 30, 2006
  • #19
HISSIN50 said:
Here's a post by S&2B's (I don't know him, nor have I talked with him, but he seems to have a decent handle on things). He indicates that it's 2.7 volts plus "turn on" voltage (turn-on voltage = the baseline ~1 volt, I presume).

http://forums.stangnet.com/showpost.php?p=5869635&postcount=8


I'd note that all the info in this post is fox-specific, in case someone knows the 94-95 TPS function to be different.
Click to expand...

Hmmm...well I guess I need to datalog w/ my tweecer and see where the threshold lies....
scott
 

FlyBy763

Member
Apr 23, 2004
439
0
17
Palm Bay, FL
Jul 1, 2006
#20
  • Jul 1, 2006
  • #20
If the computer automatically sets to the voltage why do I get check engine lights about my TPS voltage? It doesnt happen at startup, just while driving. Not trying to argue, just curious.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

TPs sensors different?
  • Creomod
  • Sep 4, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
19
Views
570
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 11, 2026
DadLife0724
R
TPS
  • Redguy69
  • May 5, 2025
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
1
Views
155
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech May 5, 2025
Noobz347
2001 SVT Cobra slow return to idle speed
  • phil2001svt
  • Oct 21, 2026
  • SVT Tech Forum
Replies
3
Views
136
SVT Tech Forum Nov 2, 2026
phil2001svt
Engine Vacc leak detector
  • Creomod
  • Jul 19, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
201
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 25, 2026
Mustang5L5
M
Bad PCM?
  • MrPuffels
  • Jul 22, 2026
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Replies
0
Views
162
2005 - 2009 Specific Tech Jul 22, 2026
MrPuffels
M
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?