• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Accufab 75mm T/B vs. BBK 75mm

  • Thread starter Thread starter wms004
  • Start date Start date Jan 26, 2004

wms004

Founding Member
Jan 15, 2002
2,864
2
49
Los Angeles
Jan 26, 2004
#1
  • Jan 26, 2004
  • #1
Anyone have any negative experiences with either.. Any major differences in quality? I'm expecting that the Accufab is made better but I don't have much to base that assumption on. One make more power than the other when combined with new Plenum? I was set on the accufab, but for the money just making sure its worth it, thanks

-wade
 

Beau

Founding Member
Jan 29, 2000
3,050
0
0
San Diego
Jan 26, 2004
#2
  • Jan 26, 2004
  • #2
i dont think either are CARB approved. meaning they dont have EO numbers or anything. so you'd have to take them off for smog.
 

wms004

Founding Member
Jan 15, 2002
2,864
2
49
Los Angeles
Jan 26, 2004
#3
  • Jan 26, 2004
  • #3
thanks.. any performance input anyone?
 

Beau

Founding Member
Jan 29, 2000
3,050
0
0
San Diego
Jan 26, 2004
#4
  • Jan 26, 2004
  • #4
they'll both give you performance increases but the accufab version seems to be getting the most attention these days.
 

wms004

Founding Member
Jan 15, 2002
2,864
2
49
Los Angeles
Jan 26, 2004
#5
  • Jan 26, 2004
  • #5
1990StangLX said:
they'll both give you performance increases but the accufab version seems to be getting the most attention these days.
Click to expand...
yeah, tahts what it seems like.. you should get some fatty rear wheels if you are going wingless
 

Beau

Founding Member
Jan 29, 2000
3,050
0
0
San Diego
Jan 26, 2004
#6
  • Jan 26, 2004
  • #6
wms004 said:
yeah, tahts what it seems like.. you should get some fatty rear wheels if you are going wingless
Click to expand...
17 x 10.5s in the rear on 295/45 r 17 but if i feel crazy i'll go to 315 and just have it look disgustingly awesome
 
K

Ken01GTvert

Member
Aug 27, 2003
175
0
16
Colorado
Jan 26, 2004
#7
  • Jan 26, 2004
  • #7
I had a Accufab 70mm and a BBK 75mm. I decided to go with the Accufab because it made less noise and looks a heck of a lot better.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
B
'03 GT Fuel Pump/Pressure/Delivery Issue
  • Brodach
  • Oct 21, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
890
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 31, 2025
gkomo
Forced Induction Bypass valve backwards?
  • Dontknowchit
  • Jun 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
338
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jun 29, 2025
JD1964
Electrical Innovate PSB-1 is DOA? Am I an idiot? All plausable. Please Help
  • Dontknowchit
  • Apr 26, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
1
Views
460
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 26, 2025
Dontknowchit
T
Resolved 1989 GT Slight Stutter Under Load
  • Tim83
  • Jun 26, 2023
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 6, 2024
Mindseye007
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?